Nyayashastram’s National Comparative Case Commentary Competition 2020: Register by July 29

Must Read

Call for Blogs | NMIMS Law Review Blog

About the Blog NMIMS Law Review Blog serves as a regular accompaniment to our annual Law Review. The Blog is...

3rd Live Webinar Series on “Various Dimensions of Internet Contracts in 21st Century : Challenges and Consequences” [November 7 to 9, 2020] by Lexstructor:...

About the Organization Lexstructor is an online, open access legal journal & news publication platform and education imparting organization, which...

Adhrit Foundation’s 3rd Indian Law Conclave – Register Now

The 3rd Indian Law Conclave, a two day National Conclave organized by Adhrit Foundation - a member organization of...

Law Gardener in association with BMS college of Law Presents it’s 6th National Quiz Competition

Law Gardener in Association with BMS College of Law Presents 6th National Level Quiz Competition On Family Law (Hindu...

Call for Papers-Workshop on Plural Ideas of Justice by JusticeAdda [Apr 23-24, ’21]: Submit by Oct 31

About Justice Adda Justice Adda is a human rights and legal design social venture, which aims to make the law and...

Call for Submissions| NLIU’s Blog on IP and Technology Law [Rolling Basis]

About the Institution National Law Institute University is a law school and a Centre for research located in Bhopal, India. Established in 1997 by...

Follow us

About the Organiser

Nyayashastram: The Law Blog is a student-run website/blog with the aid and advice from eminent Lawyers and Academicians across the nation. The blog is aimed to foster legal research by providing a platform to encourage the original and unpublished work of authors.

About the Competition

Nyayashastram is organising National Comparative Case Commentary Competition 2020.

A case comment, as the name suggests, is an extended commentary on a particular court case. The purpose of a case commentary is to give the writer an opportunity to assess not only how a specific case was disposed of in court, but also, to survey the development of that area of the law represented by the selected case and social, economic and political consequences of the decision.

Nyayshastram invites UG/PG students from both law and humanities background interested in law or public policy matters to write a comparative case commentary on the given case-laws.

Eligibility

Law students and Humanities students pursuing 3 years/5 years-integrated courses, UG/PG courses can participate in the event.

Students may participate individually or in a team of two. For clarity, there can be a maximum of 2 authors to one entry. The participation is ‘theme-wise’. If an author or authors wish to participate in more than one theme then they will have to register for each such theme by paying a separate registration fee.

Topics

The broad themes for the comparative case-commentary shall include case-laws relating to Criminal Law, Cyber Law, Environmental Law, Human Rights (inclusive of women’s & child rights) and Intellectual Property Law.

  • Criminal Law: State (N.C.T. of Delhi) vs. Navjot Sandhu and Ors. AIR 2005 SC 3820, Tuka Ram and Anr. vs. State of Maharashtra 1979 AIR 185, K.M. Nanavati vs. The State of Bombay AIR 1961 SC 112, AIR 1962 SC 605
  • Cyber Law: NASSCOM vs. Ajay Sood & Others (119 (2005) DLT 596, SMC Pneumatics (India) Private Limited vs. Jogesh Kwatra, CS(OS) No. 1279/2001 (Delhi High Court, 2001), Swami Ramdev and Another vs. Facebook Inc. (2019 SCC OnLine Del 10701: (2019) 263 DLT 689)
  • Environmental Law: M.C. Mehta vs. Union of India – Ganga Pollution Case (1987) 4 SCC 463, M.C. Mehta vs. Union of India – Taj Trapezium Case 1987 SCR (1) 819, Animal Welfare Board of India vs. A. Nagaraja & Ors. (2014) 7 SCC 547
  • Human Rights: Laxmi vs. Union of India (2014) 4 SCC 427, CEHAT vs. Union of India (2003) 8 SCC 412, Vishaka and Ors. vs. State of Rajasthan AIR 1997 SC 3011
  • Intellectual Property Law: Navigators Logistics vs. Kashif Qureshi CS(COMM) 735/2016, Sanjay Kumar Gupta & Anr v. Sony Pictures Networks India P Ltd. AIR (2018) Delhi 169, The Coca-Cola Company Vs. Bisleri International Pvt. Ltd Manu/DE/2698/2009

Prizes

  • Prizes will be declared for each separate theme.
  • Winners: Cash prize of Rs 400/- + E-Certificate of Achievement + Blog Publication + Certificate of Publication + Internship Opportunity as a Content Writer at Nyayshastram – The Law Blog
  • Runners up: Cash Prize of Rs 200/- + E-Certificate of Achievement + Blog Publication + Certificate of Publication + Internship Opportunity as a Content Writer at Nyayshastram – The Law Blog
  • 2nd Runners up: E-Certificate of Achievement + Blog Publication + Certificate of Publication + Internship Opportunity as a Content Writer at Nyayshastram – The Law Blog
  • E-Certificate of Appreciation shall be given to participants securing Rank 4 & Rank 5 under each theme, publication and certificate of publication will also be given.
  • E-Certificate of Participation to all the other participants shall be given.

How to Submit?

For the submission guidelines, please refer to the Rules&Regulations document as attached.

The submissions for the respective themes have to be done via uploading the document & pdf files on google form through the following links:

How to Register?

There shall be a nominal registration fee of Rs 50/- per person for participating under a particular theme and is payable through UPI/PHONEPE/GOOGLEPAY for participating under any particular theme. Co-authors will have to pay the registration fee separately.

The registration fee has to be paid to the following mobile number: 7337603842 (ABHISHEK BHUSHAN SINGH)

After payment of the registration fee, the participants are required to fill this form to complete the registration process.

Important Dates

  • Last date of Registration: 29th July 2020
  • Last date of submission: 5th August 2020
  • Results: 31st August 2020 (Tentatively)

Contact Information

E-mail ID: [email protected]

Aniket Dutta: 7301763148

Shivangi Pandia: 8209024838

Abhishek Singh: 7337603842

For the brochure, rules and regulations of the competition, click here.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. Libertatem Group does not take any responsibility for the accuracy of this Event Notification. The post has been shared as we received it from the event organizers/host

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Privy Council Clarifies Approach To Winding up in “Deadlock” Cases in the Case of Chu v. Lau

The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council clarified several aspects of the law concerning just and equitable winding-up petitions, as well as shareholder disputes...

Madras High Court Directs Hospital To Submit Necessary Medical Reports to Authorization Committee for Approval of Kidney Transplant

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a Writ of Mandamus to K.G. Hospital, Coimbatore by P. Sankar & V. Sobana....

Punjab Woman Evokes Petition for Protection Fearing Honour Killing

In the case of Divya Mattu and another vs State of Punjab and others, the petitioner, Divya, fearing honour killing against her by her...

Punjab Woman Accuses Punjab Police of Keeping Husband in Illegal Custody and Framing Him in a False Case

In the case of Geeta v the State of Punjab, the petitioner evoked a writ petition of habeas corpus as she claimed that her...

Addition of Words as Prefixes or Suffixes Is an Infringement of a Registered Trademark: Delhi High Court

Justice Jayanth Nath allowed the Times Group to use its registered trademark “Newshour”, in the case of Bennett Coleman and Co. Ltd v. ARG Outlier...

Just Because the Deceased Did Not Have License, Does Not Imply He Was Negligent: Chhattisgarh High Court

In the case of Hemlal & Others v. Dayaram & Others, a Single Bench of Chhattisgarh High Court consisting of Justice Sanjay S. Agrawal annunciated various...

Hoardings Are Movable Property Under Section 2(3) of DMC Act Subject To the Twin Test: Delhi High Court

Delhi High Court in the case of Delhi International Airport v South Delhi Metropolitan Corporation discussed in detail the provision under Section 2(3) of the DMC...

State Cannot Issue Directions on Rate of Charge of Non-COVID Patients in Private Hospitals: Bombay High Court

On 23rd October 2020, the Nagpur Bench of Bombay High court at Nagpur, consisting of Justice R.K. Deshpande and Justice Pushpa V. Ganediwala gave...

UAPA Cannot Be Used When the Accused Does Not Have an Active Knowledge of the Offence: Delhi High Court

Justice Suresh Kumar Kait held that the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act cannot be charged on the accused when he does not have any knowledge...

US Court Orders Iran To Pay $1.4 BN in Damages To Missing Former FBI Agent’s Family

The United States District Court for the District of Columbia ordered Iran to pay in total $1.45 bn to the Levinson family in punitive...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -