Call For Papers: SLR Law Journal Of National Law School Of India University, Bangalore; Submission Deadline is September 15, 2020

Must Read

Call for Papers by TNNLU Law Review Vol 4 Issue 1 [Tamil Nadu NLU]: Submit by Mar 31,2021

Tamil Nadu National Law University Law review or TNNLU law Review is inviting submissions through call for papers for...

Call for Papers by LALC’s Book [Legal Awareness & Literacy Committee] of Amity Law School, Noida: Submit by Feb 1,2021

LALC or Legal Awareness & Literacy Committee, of Amity Law School, Noida invites submissions through a “Call For Papers” for...

The Legal Insider’s 4th National Article Writing Competition: Register by Jan 27, 2021

The Legal Insider is organizing its 4th National Article Writing Competition.  About the Organizer The Legal Insider is a rapidly growing...

Call for Papers: Juriortus Book with ISBN by CB Educational Services: Submit by Feb 5,2021

About CB Eduvents CB Educational Services is one of its kind technology-driven academic start-up incorporated as a Limited Liability Partnership...

Call for Blogs by The Quest Socio-Legal Review: Rolling Submissions

Quest Socio-Legal Review is inviting submissions for its blog on socio-legal issues, contemporary legal issues as well as on...

Call for Papers: International Journal for Research in Law [ISSN: 2454-8715]: Submit by Feb 15,2021

International Journal for Research in Law (ISSN: 2454-8715) (A Peer-Reviewed, Quarterly Publication) invites Articles, Short Notes, Book Reviews Case...

Follow us

About the Socio-Legal Review (SLR) :

SLR is currently accepting submissions for the first issue of Volume 17. SLR is a bi-annual, student-run, peer-reviewed journal published by the National Law School of India University, Bangalore. SLR began with the support of the Modern Law Review, London in 2005 and has, over the past few years, carried articles by luminaries in the legal and social field such as Rajeev Dhavan, Roger Cotterrell, W.T. Murphy and Asghar Ali Engineer. It aims to be a forum that involves, promotes and engages scholars and students to express and share their ideas and opinions on themes and methodologies relating to the interface between law and society.

Contribution Guidelines :

SLR invites contributions in the following categories –

  • Long Articles : Between 6,000 – 8,000 words.
  • Short Articles : Between 3,500 – 5,000 words.
  • Book Reviews : Between 2,000 – 3,000 words.
  • Case Notes/ Legislative Comments : Between 1,500 – 2,500 words.
  • Notes from the Field : Notes from the Field are pieces designed to provide a glimpse into a new legal strategy, political initiative or advocacy technique applied in the field, a current problem or obstacle faced in legal reform or development work, or a new issue that has not yet received much attention and needs to be brought to light. For contributions in this category, empirical studies are encouraged.

All manuscripts must be submitted in a .doc or .docx format. The manuscripts must necessarily be accompanied with the author’s biographical information in a separate title page and an abstract of not more than 250 words.

For formatting and citation guidelines, please refer to SLR’s style guide.

Deadline :

  • The last date for submission of manuscripts for Volume 17(1) : September 15, 2020.
  • Submissions sent after this will be considered for publication in Volume 17(2).

Submission :

Contributions to SLR must be made in the electronic form only. Please mail contributions to sociolegalre[email protected], with the subject ‘Submission for Socio-Legal Review – Volume 17(1)’.

Timeline and Procedure :

SLR strives to ensure a speedy and efficient review process. We follow a system of two rounds of internal reviews by the Editorial Board. If approved in both rounds, the manuscript is then subjected to two double-blind peer reviews simultaneously. Authors should be prepared to make suitable changes to their manuscripts as required by the Editorial Board before publication.

Conditions of Publication :

Please note that manuscripts not conforming to these guidelines 

may be returned or rejected. While we strive to provide substantive feedback for every manuscript we receive, it may not always be possible to do so, given the large number of submissions. We reserve the right to reject manuscripts without providing substantive feedback.

Please note that in the event that a manuscript submitted to SLR has been submitted and accepted by any other Journal, the author must withdraw their submission from SLR. If SLR accepts the manuscript first, the author must withdraw it for consideration from all other Journals. Failure to do so will lead to removal of the piece for consideration for publication in SLR.

For more information : Click here


 

Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. Libertatem Group does not take any responsibility for the accuracy of this Event Notification. The post has been shared as we received it from the event organizers/host.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

UK Supreme Court Rules in Favour of Policyholders in the COVID-19 Business Interruption Case

The United Kingdom’s Supreme Court finally concluded the long-awaited COVID-19 business interruption case brought by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and the Hiscox Action...

Kerala High Court Disposes of Writ Petition on Grounds That Reliefs Sought Are Already in Process of Being Granted, Directs State to Complete the...

Excerpt A single-judge bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice Shircy V. gave orders on the writ petition filed by the Petitioner. This writ is filed by...

Supreme Court Directs Government To Provide Free Education To Minor Children of Rape Victims

The Deputy Commissioner of Ranchi was directed by the Supreme Court on Wednesday to make sure that minor children of rape victims are ensured free education till they attain the age of 14 years. The Court made the observation while hearing a plea filed by a woman who claimed that she belonged to the SC/ST group from Jharkhand. She was forced by a man after which her father lodged a complaint.

Aadhar Review Plea Rejected in a 4:1 Verdict by Supreme Court

The petition seeking the re-examination of the 2018 Aadhar Verdict which declares the Aadhar act constitutional and valid was dismissed by a 5-judge bench in a 4:1 verdict. In January the petitions were considered by a bench of Justices A M Khanwilkar, D Y Chandrachud, S Abdul Nazeer, Ashok Bhushan, and B R Gavai in the chamber and the order was up on the website on Wednesday.

New Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) Amendments Are Valid Says Supreme Court

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court upheld the amendments in the insolvency and bankruptcy code which makes it mandatory for a minimum of 100 or 10% of home buyers of a project to initiate insolvency proceedings against a builder for not delivering flats or commercial shops on time.

[HUL – Sebamed Ad War] Bombay High Court Passed Injunction; Permits Sebamed Ad Against HUL’s Dove

The ad war between the German personal care brand Sebamed and the consumer goods giant Hindustan Unilever Ltd (HUL) has come to an end. On January 19th, Bombay High Court passed an injunction order permitting the Sebamed ad against Hindustan Unilever’s Dove without any changes. It was observed that Sebamed ads were backed with evidence-based data. However, Sebamed was ordered to put an end to its advertisement that compared HUL soap bars Lux, Pears, and Santoor with Rin and detergent category.

Bombay High Court Says White Collar Crimes Are More Dangerous Than Murder and Dacoity

The Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court rejected 4 petitions of 4 businessmen after observing that white-collar crimes are more serious than murder and dacoity. The businesspersons were booked for fraud of evading GST by producing fake invoices.

Right To Protection Can’t Be Granted To Married Woman Involved in Live-in Relationship: Allahabad High Court

The Bench of Allahabad High Court dismissed a petition of a live-in couple, observing that a married woman in a live-in relationship is not entitled to any sort of legal protection whatsoever. The Court remarked that they are adults and should live as ‘husband and wife’ if they want no one to interfere in their lives.

Police To Decide on the Entry of Farmers To Delhi on Republic Day Says Supreme Court

While the Supreme Court heard a plea seeking an injunction against the tractor rally that is scheduled for January 26th, it held that it is the decision of the Delhi Police officers to see whether the protesting farmers should get entry into Delhi on Republic Day.

[Sushant Singh Rajput Case]: Republic TV & Times Now Hindered Investigation Probe Says Bombay HC

In November last year, the Court had reserved its judgement on the PILs that came from 8 former police officers from Maharashtra, lawyers, activists and NGOs, seeking restraining orders against the media trial in the Sushant Singh Rajput case.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -