Call for Blogs: Arbitration & Corporate Law Review: Rolling Submissions

Must Read

Call for Blogs | NMIMS Law Review Blog

About the Blog NMIMS Law Review Blog serves as a regular accompaniment to our annual Law Review. The Blog is...

3rd Live Webinar Series on “Various Dimensions of Internet Contracts in 21st Century : Challenges and Consequences” [November 7 to 9, 2020] by Lexstructor:...

About the Organization Lexstructor is an online, open access legal journal & news publication platform and education imparting organization, which...

Adhrit Foundation’s 3rd Indian Law Conclave – Register Now

The 3rd Indian Law Conclave, a two day National Conclave organized by Adhrit Foundation - a member organization of...

Law Gardener in association with BMS college of Law Presents it’s 6th National Quiz Competition

Law Gardener in Association with BMS College of Law Presents 6th National Level Quiz Competition On Family Law (Hindu...

Call for Papers-Workshop on Plural Ideas of Justice by JusticeAdda [Apr 23-24, ’21]: Submit by Oct 31

About Justice Adda Justice Adda is a human rights and legal design social venture, which aims to make the law and...

Call for Submissions| NLIU’s Blog on IP and Technology Law [Rolling Basis]

About the Institution National Law Institute University is a law school and a Centre for research located in Bhopal, India. Established in 1997 by...

Follow us

About the Blogs

The Arbitration & Corporate Law Review is a student-run blog founded by three final year students of Maharashtra National Law University Mumbai and run under the Guidance of Dr. Kiran Rai, Head of Department (UG), MNLU Mumbai.

The vision is to provide real-time updates and facilitate dialogue on contemporary issues while collaborating with expert advisors to evaluate and ensure that the content is practically valuable and most relevant. The objective of the blog is to provide constructive feedback through an exhaustive review process while encouraging engagement and promote expression.

With a unique blend of industry leaders and students with focus on curating content and making it freely available,
ACLR strives to serve as a platform for reviewing reforms in arbitration, corporate and commercial laws.

Call for Blogs

The Arbitration & Corporate Law Review “ACLR” invites submissions, including articles, research pieces, opinions, case comments and short notes on Company law, Insolvency law, Securities law, Competition law, Arbitration Law, Law of Taxation, IPR, Trade Law and Employment law. The submissions must be original and unpublished.

Advisory Board

The ACLR is fortunate to have a Board of Advisors comprising of Senior professionals from distinguished Domestic and International Law firms like Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy, Finsec Law Advisors, Khaitan & Co., PSL Advocates, Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co., Legasis Partners, Acuity Law, United Maritime Law Chambers, and Azmi & Associates.

The Board also comprises of legal academicians with immense experience in the subject areas who area acting as mentors for the initiative. Along with a stellar reputation as professionals, the members of the board also share a keen interest in the academic front of the law and have regularly contributed to the literature and research in their respective fields.

Submission Guidelines

Manuscripts can be submitted through the Google Form in the Submission Guidelines page of the website.

  • Co-authorship: Co-authorship up to two authors is permitted.
  • Plagiarism: The submission should reflect original and unpublished work. A maximum similarity of 15% is allowed. Non-adherence to this rule shall result in rejection of the article summarily with no chance for improvement.
  • Length: Submissions must ideally be limited to a length of 1500 words. This limit shall be exclusive of any explanatory endnotes that are added. Non-adherence of the word limit can be allowed only if deemed necessary.
  • Formatting: Submissions should be made in Microsoft Word (.docx) format. The submission should adhere to the following formatting style. Font: Times New Roman, Font size:12, Line spacing:1.5. (For Endnotes Font size: 10, Line spacing:1)
  • Citation: Relevant sources such as judgments, laws, treaties, news article and other legal texts must be added as hyperlinks in-text. Where sources are not available as open-source documents, Endnotes may be added adhering to the uniform Bluebook 20th Edition citation style.

Review Process

  • An exhaustive two-tier blind review process is undertaken with a strict deadline adherence (maximum of seven days).
  • The Editorial Board retains complete discretion over acceptance or rejection of manuscripts.
  • Every article undergoes a comprehensive two-tier review and is sent back with comments for improvement, suggested changes, or cogent reasons for rejection/selection. Acceptance of a manuscript for publication is contingent on the incorporation of such suggestions to the satisfaction of the Board of Editors.
  • The final decision of the editorial team shall be conveyed within the timeline of 7 days subject to response of the authors in case the article is sent back for revision.
  • Upon acceptance of the manuscript for publication by ACLR, the copyright over the manuscript is vested with ACLR. However, the moral rights over the manuscript shall vest in the author(s).
  • If any author wishes to cross-publish his/her article originally published ACLR, ACLR’s consent must be taken prior to sending the article for submission. Further, due credit should be given to ACLR in the form of a correct reference to the original content.

 

The website of the Arbitration & Corporate Law Review can be accessed here.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. Libertatem Group does not take any responsibility for the accuracy of this Event Notification. The post has been shared as we received it from the event organizers/host

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Punjab Woman Evokes Petition for Protection Fearing Honour Killing

In the case of Divya Mattu and another vs State of Punjab and others, the petitioner, Divya, fearing honour killing against her by her...

Punjab Woman Accuses Punjab Police of Keeping Husband in Illegal Custody and Framing Him in a False Case

In the case of Geeta v the State of Punjab, the petitioner evoked a writ petition of habeas corpus as she claimed that her...

Addition of Words as Prefixes or Suffixes Is an Infringement of a Registered Trademark: Delhi High Court

Justice Jayanth Nath allowed the Times Group to use its registered trademark “Newshour”, in the case of Bennett Coleman and Co. Ltd v. ARG Outlier...

Just Because the Deceased Did Not Have License, Does Not Imply He Was Negligent: Chhattisgarh High Court

In the case of Hemlal & Others v. Dayaram & Others, a Single Bench of Chhattisgarh High Court consisting of Justice Sanjay S. Agrawal annunciated various...

Hoardings Are Movable Property Under Section 2(3) of DMC Act Subject To the Twin Test: Delhi High Court

Delhi High Court in the case of Delhi International Airport v South Delhi Metropolitan Corporation discussed in detail the provision under Section 2(3) of the DMC...

State Cannot Issue Directions on Rate of Charge of Non-COVID Patients in Private Hospitals: Bombay High Court

On 23rd October 2020, the Nagpur Bench of Bombay High court at Nagpur, consisting of Justice R.K. Deshpande and Justice Pushpa V. Ganediwala gave...

UAPA Cannot Be Used When the Accused Does Not Have an Active Knowledge of the Offence: Delhi High Court

Justice Suresh Kumar Kait held that the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act cannot be charged on the accused when he does not have any knowledge...

US Court Orders Iran To Pay $1.4 BN in Damages To Missing Former FBI Agent’s Family

The United States District Court for the District of Columbia ordered Iran to pay in total $1.45 bn to the Levinson family in punitive...

Onus on Petitioner To Show Unassailable Facts: Delhi High Court

In the case of Rhythm Jain v National Testing Agency, the Delhi High Court mentioned that in such petitions the onus to prove the facts...

Under-Trial/Convicted Persons Do Not Have Absolute Right To Parole in Light of Coronavirus : Bombay High Court

An important judgment was given by the Division Bench of the Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court concerning the constitutionality of Rule 19 of...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -