The present petition under Section 96 CPC was directed against the judgment and decree passed by District Judge Pali, whereby, the suit filed by the respondent -plaintiff was decreed for possession and mesne profit. The same was, however, dismissed by the Court.
Saroj Punhani, Information Commissioner will decide whether the response provided by the CPIO is within the provisions of the RTI Act.
On Thursday, the Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court took a suo moto cognizance against the black-marketing of the covid drug Remdesivir that is used in the treatment of Covid-19.
In the hearing of the petition filed against the BJP MP Dr Sujay Vikhe Patil on the alleged illegal procurement and distribution of Remdesivir injections via a chartered flight from Delhi to Shirdi, the Bombay High Court going against the press conference held by the Ahmedabad District Collector said that even though they were not forming a final opinion yet, that the district collector seemed to be protecting to concerned MP.
A criminal petition was filed by the Petitioners, seeking to quash the proceedings initiated against them, on the file of Station House Officer, Women Police Station, CCS, DD, Hyderabad.
An Original Side Appeal was filed under Order XXXVI Rule 9 of O.S. Rules r/w Clause 15 of the Letters Patent to set aside the common order and decree dated 10.11.2020 by the Madras High Court.
In the present case, the petitioner filed a suit for declaration with consequential relief of partition and possession. In addition, an application for interim relief against the respondents was filed in respect to land that was claimed to be joint and un-partitioned property. The Court allowed the petition and directed the lower court to reconsider the matter.
The Petitioner filed the writ petition to exempt the commercial pilots from undergoing the mandatory breath-analyzer tests and to direct the Respondent to reinstate the earlier order and suspend the test.
This is a criminal revision petition where the Petitioner is sentenced and convicted for the punishable offence under Section 228 and 338 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for an imprisonment of 4 months and 1 year respectively.
Case: Phoenix Arc Private Limited versus Ketulbhai Ramubhai Patel Introduction: Recently, the Honorable Supreme Court of India, in the case of Phoenix Arc Private Limited
Subscribe to our newsletter and receive a curated selection of legal updates directly to your inbox.
