This Article analyses the difference between the secularism in France and in India, in light of France’s Draft Law Against Islamism.
In the Article, it is discussed how Judiciary has made it clear that the right of an individual to marry a person of his or her choice irrespective of any caste, race, religion, etc. is a fundamental right and is considered an important part of Article 21 which is the Right to life and personal liberty.
The IBC is adaptive, dynamic, and flexible, thus making it highly impactful, however adequate institutional capacity is essential to ensure that the IBC does not suffer from the plights of earlier reform attempts such as the Debt Recovery Tribunals.
It is essential for the higher judiciary to ensure Judiciary’s independence along with accountability and transparency which can also deal with issues of piles of pending cases. Many believe that both these obligations are conflicted, however it is essential to reconcile both independence along with accountability.
The Kerala state government amended the Kerala Police Act in order to prevent cyber-attacks against women and children, however this amendment is said to curtail freedom of speech and expression.
The Madurai bench of the Madras High Court heard public interest litigation concerning the ban of certain online games, an ordinance was later passed in this regard. However, the Ordinance leaves several questions unanswered, for example, manifesting as the clear lack of a definition of ‘wagering’ and ‘betting’.
A conciliation proceeding is initiated by a party sending to the other party a written invitation to conciliate. As contrasted from arbitration, when a matter is referred to conciliation, the matter does not go out of the stream of court process permanently. If there is no settlement, the matter is returned to the court for framing issues and proceeding with the trial.
On Monday, two bills which are being called as the Shakti Bill was presented before the Maharastra State Assembly. But the sections provided in the Maharashtra Shakti Law, 2020, are only good enough to make political statements, but are nugatory and would be ineffective for ‘Rape’.
The present article seeks to anatomize the ground of ‘mental cruelty’ for claiming divorce or judicial separation. It is essential to see the types of custody, the realm of judicial separation vis-a-vis mental cruelty, the procedure to prove the ground, among others to understand it’s scope in a better way.
Alternative Dispute Resolution (“ADR”) represents a variety of processes through which potential litigants may resolve disputes. The traditional view is that processes ranging from face-to-face negotiations to formal, binding arbitrations are used as an alternative to litigation. Today, however, the process of litigation occupies a place within a spectrum of “Appropriate Dispute Resolution”.
Subscribe to our newsletter and receive a curated selection of legal updates directly to your inbox.
