France’s Draft Law Against Islamism: What Makes French Secularism Different from Indian Secularism?

Must Read

Should the Exorbitant Amounts Charged for RT-PCR Tests be Refunded?

Introduction A plea has been filed in the Honourable Supreme Court of India seeking a refund of exorbitant amounts charged...

Should CCTV’s be Installed in the Police Station?

Introduction In a recent judgment, the bench led by Justice Nariman issued directions to both the state and Union Territory...

A Legal Analysis of the West Bengal Political Crisis on IPS Deputation

The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has recently summoned three IPS officers of West Bengal (WB). The decision was...

Explained: Postal Ballot for NRIs

At the end of November 2020, Election Commission sent a proposal to the law ministry to amend the Representation...

Explained: Constitutional Provisions and Legislations With Regards to a Person with Disabilities

The world celebrates December 3 as International Day of Persons with Disabilities (IDPD). This day is also called World...

“Pro-Enforcement Bias” Towards Foreign Arbitral Awards Domestically, in light of Vijay Karia and Ors. V. Prysmian Cavi E Sistemi S.R.L and Ors.

International Arbitration faces challenges domestically due to unharmonized local laws for enforcement. Often it may occur that an award...

Follow us

A draft law has been presented within the French cabinet on 9th December 2020 to curb the rise of ‘radical Islam’ within the country. The draft bill will aim at an increase in the surveillance of Islamic groups within the country.

Introduction

The French cabinet under the leadership of President Emmanuel Macron and Prime Minister Jean Castex has put forth a new law. The law aims to curb ‘radical Islam’ within the country. The bill has been introduced following the rise in terror attacks within the country over the past few years. It got accelerated into being following the beheading of Samuel Patty. The bill would focus on more surveillance in mosques and would advocate a limit on homeschooling. This is to ensure that all children within the country get exposed to French schooling approved by the government.

Online hate campaigns will also bear a brunt of the force projected by the bill as severe restrictions will exist on such campaigns. The government would become involved in the training of imams. Restrictions will arise on places of worship with relation to public funding. This will happen only if such places incite religious tensions or violence among its members. The intimidation of public servants on religious grounds will also be restricted. The term ‘republican principles’ got included within the Bill. The title was changed from Law against Islamic separatism to Strengthening Republican Principles. The title got changed as the previous title could lead to the stigmatization of French Muslims.  

The Opinions on the Bill 

The bill has seen increased support among the French populace, as a necessary change to curb the rise of extremism within the country. But experts have stated that the necessity of the bill comes into question. Title V of the 1905 French law on the separation of the Churches and State provides adequate checks and balances on religious institutions. A major part of the new bill focuses on the elimination of religious coercion. The contention arises that the rules laid down in the 1905 law are adequate to curb religious extremism. The point arises that the proper implementation of the existing law would prove to be adequate as a measure to quell religious extremism within the State. The bill has received condemnation from other nations such as Turkey and Pakistan.

The countries have accused the President of being discriminatory towards Muslims. President Emmanuel Macron has received backlash in many instances. The accusations begin from the curbing of the freedom of speech of the press to the controversial Yellow-Vest movement against the tax laws imposed by the government. Thus, the underlying agenda of the Bill comes into the picture as the President gears up for his reelection campaign in 2022. 

French Secularism v. Indian Secularism 

French secularism has been defined through the 1905 act which separates that relation between the church and the state. This was introduced as a measure to curb the growing influence of the Catholic Church upon French governance. The French model of secularism known as laicite focuses on eliminating religious differences. The principles of French secularism advocate the elimination of the religious identity of a person. The principles of equality, liberty, and fraternity are to take their place instead.

The French law on secularity and conspicuous religious symbols in schools is an example of the nature of French secularism. It bans the wearing of any religious symbols by the children studying in schools. It includes the schools that come under the direct control of the French government. This was seen as an extension of the principle of laicite as it was passed as a measure to ensure that religion and state stay different. But the law was found to be discriminatory against Muslim schoolgirls.

The other religions have found multiple ways in adapting their beliefs along with the law which Islam was unable to do. This brings up the bigger question of whether the principle of laicite still stands today. Indian secularism promotes all religious beliefs. It also promotes religious differences within the country. The Indian model of secularism focuses on the separation of religion and State. This occurs while religious differences are not eliminated.

All religions have the freedom to express themselves according to their customs and practices within the purview of the law. Such a form of secularism is known as positive secularism. It promotes religion by allowing an environment of peace and prosperity among all religions. The Western form of secularism has a clear-cut distinction between religion and the State. In India, the distinction is not as clear. Personal laws exist within the country with respect to each religion. Reservation allocated to individuals within the State based on communal lines. These are examples of how secularism is different in the Indian context. The implementation of a Uniform Civil Code although advocated by Article 44 of the Directive Principles of State Policy, is not an extensive practice in India. 

Conclusion

The population of France is not the same as it was in 1905. The country is becoming a home to people of different beliefs and ethnic persuasions. This must be taken into consideration. The separation of state and religion is a concept that is becoming redundant within France. The homogeneity of the French population is reducing day by day.

The lack of expression of religious values within the country could lead to the hurting of religious sentiments of the people and the oppression of the minority. A loss of culture is also a possible outcome. In the light of the issues that have been raised following the introduction of this bill, the question of French secularism is something that needs to be answered soon for the sake of the French people and the identity of France.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Lahore High Court Outlaws Two-Finger Virginity Test

The Lahore High Court in Pakistan has outlawed the use and conduct of virginity tests, namely, the use of the “two-finger” virginity test and...

London Court Rejects Assange’s Extradition – What Happens Now? 

Earlier last week, District Judge Vanessa Baraitser, sitting in the Westminster Magistrates’ Court denied the Government of the U.S.A.'s request to the U.K. to...

Calcutta High Court Decides in Favor of Contractor as He Accidentally Pays an Excessively High Amount

Introduction The present writ petition has been filed for a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondents to revoke the Petitioner’s offer as...

Petition Filed in Delhi High Court Challenging the New Privacy Policy of WhatsApp

A petition has been raised before the Delhi High Court challenging the updated privacy policy of the instant messaging app, WhatsApp. It is accused of looking into the virtual activities of the users,

Bombay High Court Says Pleas Against the Rejection of Nomination Before the Polls Is Not Maintainable

Bombay High Court on Wednesday held that a candidate cannot challenge his nomination by filing a writ petition before a court prior to the polls after his nominations have already been rejected by the Returning Officer (RO) for the Panchayat elections of January 15.

Bombay HC: It Will Be Difficult if Civic Bodies Don’t Take Action on Illegal Constructions

The Bombay High Court said on Wednesday that if the Municipal Corporations do not take action on the illegal constructions, things will become very difficult. This observation was made by a bench comprising Chief Justice Dipankar Dutta and Justice Girish Kulkarni while hearing a PIL after the Bhiwandi building collapse on September 21st, 2020 which led to the death of 39 lives. Mumbai Thane, Ulhasnagar, Kalyan-Dombivli, Vasai-Virar, Navi Mumbai, and Bhiwandi-Nizampur corporations were filed as respondents.

Uttarakhand High Court Directed State Authorities To Frame SOP Regarding Kumbh Mela 2021

Noticing the commencement date of Kumbh Mela 2021 amid pandemic from 27 February 2021, the Uttarakhand High Court on Monday expressed concern with regard to organizing and conducting of the Mela and directed State Authorities to discuss and resolve the logistical problems which can come in organizing the Mela during the pandemic time.

Writ Petition Not Maintainable Against Mahindra Finance, Being a Purely Private Body: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court reiterated that Writ Petition against the purely private body is not maintainable and dismissed the petition which was filed against Mahindra Finance Bank as Arif Khan v. Branch Manager Mahindra Finance Sultanpur & Another.

Publication of Notices for Inter-Faith Marriages No Longer Mandatory: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court has passed a landmark judgment that likely brings relief to inter-faith marriage. The Court on Wednesday said that the mandatory publication of Notices of Inter-Faith marriages will now be optional to protect the Privacy and Liberty of the Couple. The Court observed that the publication of the notice would “invade the fundamental rights of liberty and privacy”. Therefore, it has made it optional for the couple, they can now request in form of writing to a marriage officer to publish or not to publish a notice regarding the marriage.

Bombay High Court to NIA: Consider Health and Age of Varavara Rao Before Opposing His Bail Plea

The Bombay HC on Wednesday observed that ‘we are all humans’ and asked the National Investigation Agency and the Maharashtra Government to consider the health and age of the Telugu poet-activist Varavara Rao before making submissions in response to his bail plea application on medical grounds.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -