Do We Need to Transform the Indian Insolvency System?

Must Read

Should the Exorbitant Amounts Charged for RT-PCR Tests be Refunded?

Introduction A plea has been filed in the Honourable Supreme Court of India seeking a refund of exorbitant amounts charged...

Should CCTV’s be Installed in the Police Station?

Introduction In a recent judgment, the bench led by Justice Nariman issued directions to both the state and Union Territory...

A Legal Analysis of the West Bengal Political Crisis on IPS Deputation

The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has recently summoned three IPS officers of West Bengal (WB). The decision was...

Explained: Postal Ballot for NRIs

At the end of November 2020, Election Commission sent a proposal to the law ministry to amend the Representation...

Explained: Constitutional Provisions and Legislations With Regards to a Person with Disabilities

The world celebrates December 3 as International Day of Persons with Disabilities (IDPD). This day is also called World...

“Pro-Enforcement Bias” Towards Foreign Arbitral Awards Domestically, in light of Vijay Karia and Ors. V. Prysmian Cavi E Sistemi S.R.L and Ors.

International Arbitration faces challenges domestically due to unharmonized local laws for enforcement. Often it may occur that an award...

Follow us

The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code has transformed insolvency legislation in India. It has replaced a rather inefficient bankruptcy legal regime and thus has helped instil a greater level of confidence in the corporate resolution methodology by making the insolvency process a sustainable, efficient, and value saving one. 

The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) has established an organization that regulates and develops insolvency policy and assesses market realities. The IBC clubbed with other significant legislative reforms brought about in recent years such as the Goods and Services Tax regime is arguably responsible for improving India’s ease of doing business currency and is helping it emerge as a ‘Make for World’ platform. 

PM Modi credited these reforms brought about in recent years for creating a surge in Foreign Direct Investment in India in 2019-2020, of nearly $74.5 billion, which is a significant increase of about 20% from 2018-2019. The IBC focuses on a time-bound resolution, and not mere liquidation, as a tool of empowerment to support companies governed by it. It has been able to successfully instil a greater level of confidence in creditors for reacquiring their investments.

The central objective was to allow greater credit to flow more freely within India while promoting confidence between the investor and investee. The IBC was suspended for a limited duration due to the COVID-19 pandemic, in the present day and the long term will prove to have been a timely reform.

Need for a Reform in the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code

There has been a longstanding need for a reform of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy system in India due to hurdles faced by the system. A reform in the IBC would be able to deal with the increasing number of backlog cases in the judicial system. Another factor that strengthens the need for a reformed insolvency regime is lowering the risk of imprisonment for actions or omissions that are not necessarily fraudulent or an outcome of mala fide intent thereby decriminalizing minor offences, thus, benefiting judicial functioning.

Some of the criminal penalties that are punishable with imprisonment for minor offences act as major deterrents for investors, thus, the IBC has not used imprisonment for punishment for minor offences. The government thus established with the help of the reform brought about a difference between good-faith mistakes and intentional bad faith actions, to penalize the former, and criminalize the latter, to create a perceived deterrent free investment culture.  

Significance of the IBC

The most important characteristic of the IBC code is the creation of an increase in the ease of doing business measures in India. The IBC has helped exponentially in improving the ease of doing business in India and enabling it to emerge as a ‘Make for World’ platform. The IBC has transformed the insolvency regime in India at a structural level with significant reform in insolvency resolution. It has provided an increasing emphasis on a time-bound resolution as it focuses on a time-bound resolution, rather than liquidation, as an empowering tool to support companies falling within its ambit.

The new regime is responsible for successfully instilling confidence in the corporate resolution methodology and thus, has created an opportunity for the creditors to recoup some of their investments in firms being liquidated or going in for resolution.

Another landmark structural change is the creation of an institutionalized creditor-in-control mechanism through which the IBC provides for an institutionalized creditor-in-control mechanism for re-organization and insolvency resolution of corporate entities, including corporate debtors (CDs) and personal guarantors. Thus, there is an easy flow of credit within India as there is a substantial increase in investor and investee confidence.

Impact of COVID-19 on the IBC

With the spread of Covid-19 in India, some of the issues with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code came to the forefront. The first was that the MSMEs are now forced to go to Civil Courts as the government increased the minimum default amount to trigger corporate insolvency resolution from ₹1 lakh to ₹1 crore, to protect MSMEs from insolvency petitions.

Another problem observed is that Section 10A of IBC law provides that “no application for initiation of corporate insolvency resolution process of a corporate debtor shall be filed, for any default arising on or after 25th March 2020 for six months or such further period. On the other hand, the proviso to the section states that no application for insolvency resolution shall ever be filed against a corporate debtor for any default occurring during the suspension period. While the main Section 10A suspends such applications for a limited period, the proviso enlarges the scope to provide complete amnesty under the IBC for any default occurring during such period.

Challenges Faced  under the IBC Regime

There were many other challenges faced by IBC, they are, the lack of enough number of resolution trained persons, information insufficiency or asymmetry; and the delays caused by multiple appeals and different verdicts at various levels of the judiciary. One of the greatest challenges to the regime under the IBC is the clogging of the 27 NLCT benches functioning around the country. The reasons for such clogging include the increasing financial stress in the economy and a low threshold for the IBC process to set in (the default of Rs.1 lakh), attracting a greater number of cases.

Other than delays caused by legal disputes, some issues need to be settled as the legal provisions are still in primal stages and thus require interpretation with respect to the spirit of the law and legislation. The Insolvency Professionals are the skeleton of the IBC as they are in charge of managing the debtors and are accountable to the creditors and the adjudicating authority for their actions. 

Addressing the Gaps in the IBC

To improve the functioning of the Code, the report of the Bankruptcy Law Reforms Committee suggests that there is a huge need for the speedy working of the bankruptcy code after it has been established. It has been suggested that the administration must look at institutionalizing the insolvency resolution process, the need for which is highlighted by the necessary suspension of the IBC proceedings. The use of technology would help create greater access to justice and increase the ease of doing business. The IBC 2020 ordinance appears to consider every default occurring during the suspension period to be a consequence of the pandemic. The ordinance should have protected only such defaults which may occur as a direct consequence of the pandemic or the lockdown and should have left this determination to the National Company Law Tribunal.

The Way Forward: Development in the IBC?

The IBC is adaptive, dynamic, and flexible, thus making it highly impactful. It is a future sensitive and omnibus legislation. The IBC goes beyond other similar pieces of legislation across the world, and through the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI), it has established an unprecedented organization that both regulates and develops insolvency policy and assesses market realities. It has increased ease of doing business and investor-investee confidence which has led to a surge in entrepreneurship.

The code has lent unprecedented support to MSMEs. The reform in the IBC will continue to instil greater confidence in investors both foreign and domestic, thus making India an even more attractive destination for investment. The adequate institutional capacity is essential to ensure that the IBC does not suffer from the plights of earlier reform attempts such as the Debt Recovery Tribunals. is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders Security To BJP Leader Alleged for Not Supporting Farmers Protest

The Order had come in the form of a Writ Petition filed by Tikshan Sood under Article 226 of the Constitution. The petition before...

Lahore High Court Outlaws Two-Finger Virginity Test

The Lahore High Court in Pakistan has outlawed the use and conduct of virginity tests, namely, the use of the “two-finger” virginity test and...

London Court Rejects Assange’s Extradition – What Happens Now? 

Earlier last week, District Judge Vanessa Baraitser, sitting in the Westminster Magistrates’ Court denied the Government of the U.S.A.'s request to the U.K. to...

Calcutta High Court Decides in Favor of Contractor as He Accidentally Pays an Excessively High Amount

Introduction The present writ petition has been filed for a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondents to revoke the Petitioner’s offer as...

Petition Filed in Delhi High Court Challenging the New Privacy Policy of WhatsApp

A petition has been raised before the Delhi High Court challenging the updated privacy policy of the instant messaging app, WhatsApp. It is accused of looking into the virtual activities of the users,

Bombay High Court Says Pleas Against the Rejection of Nomination Before the Polls Is Not Maintainable

Bombay High Court on Wednesday held that a candidate cannot challenge his nomination by filing a writ petition before a court prior to the polls after his nominations have already been rejected by the Returning Officer (RO) for the Panchayat elections of January 15.

Bombay HC: It Will Be Difficult if Civic Bodies Don’t Take Action on Illegal Constructions

The Bombay High Court said on Wednesday that if the Municipal Corporations do not take action on the illegal constructions, things will become very difficult. This observation was made by a bench comprising Chief Justice Dipankar Dutta and Justice Girish Kulkarni while hearing a PIL after the Bhiwandi building collapse on September 21st, 2020 which led to the death of 39 lives. Mumbai Thane, Ulhasnagar, Kalyan-Dombivli, Vasai-Virar, Navi Mumbai, and Bhiwandi-Nizampur corporations were filed as respondents.

Uttarakhand High Court Directed State Authorities To Frame SOP Regarding Kumbh Mela 2021

Noticing the commencement date of Kumbh Mela 2021 amid pandemic from 27 February 2021, the Uttarakhand High Court on Monday expressed concern with regard to organizing and conducting of the Mela and directed State Authorities to discuss and resolve the logistical problems which can come in organizing the Mela during the pandemic time.

Writ Petition Not Maintainable Against Mahindra Finance, Being a Purely Private Body: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court reiterated that Writ Petition against the purely private body is not maintainable and dismissed the petition which was filed against Mahindra Finance Bank as Arif Khan v. Branch Manager Mahindra Finance Sultanpur & Another.

Publication of Notices for Inter-Faith Marriages No Longer Mandatory: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court has passed a landmark judgment that likely brings relief to inter-faith marriage. The Court on Wednesday said that the mandatory publication of Notices of Inter-Faith marriages will now be optional to protect the Privacy and Liberty of the Couple. The Court observed that the publication of the notice would “invade the fundamental rights of liberty and privacy”. Therefore, it has made it optional for the couple, they can now request in form of writing to a marriage officer to publish or not to publish a notice regarding the marriage.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -