Mallikarjun is a student of law who is studying in S.S.L. Law College at Gulbarga, caught red-handed while copying in the examination held on 06.07.2019 and a malpractice case was registered against him. The Registrar (Evaluation I/c) Karnataka State Law University debarred Mallikarjun for 3 years and restricted him to
In the present case, India Cast Media Distribution (Petitioner) v. Mplex Networks Pvt. Ltd (Respondent), both parties entered into seven different agreements for seven different territories for the subscription for a certain amount of money which the respondent failed to pay to the petitioner. The Case of the petitioners is
The writ petition was filed before the high court of Karnataka praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari quashing the order passed by the respondent no.3 The registrar (evaluation) Vishweshwaraiah Technological University (VTU) for changing the examination centre from the petitioner/ Basava engineering school of technology to another college at
The Supreme Court in a matter of H.S Ramchandra V. CIT stated that the receipt held by the appellant as the capital receipt is now a revenue receipt as the appellant is no more on the position of secretary of the trust. The Supreme Court also boldly stated that the
Today I called my housemaid in India and inquired about her well-being. Her first response was: ‘Ye log Musalaman ko Desh chor ke Janey ko bol rahey hain.’ (They are telling Muslims to leave India.) I was dumbfounded. Ye log Musalaman ko Desh chor ke Janey ko bol rahey hain.
In a dramatic turn of event, Cyrus Mistry has been restored by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) on Wednesday, 18 December 2019, as the Executive Chairman of Tata Sons. NCLAT also held the appointment of N Chandrasekaran as Executive Chairman of Tata Sons illegal. The Tribunal also stated
Amended Sec 2 of The Citizenship Act, 1955 “Provided that any person belonging to Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist, Jain, Parsi or Christian community from Afghanistan, Bangladesh or Pakistan, who entered into India on or before the 31st day of December 2014 and who has been exempted by the Central Government by
The Criminal Appeal was filed under Section 374(2) of CrPC, before high court of Karnataka by the appellant/accused challenging the legality and correctness of the judgment passed by the Court of VI Additional District and Special Judge, Mysore praying to set aside the judgment and order for Convicting the appellant/accused
The writ petition filed by the appellant against the orders and demand notice issued by the Cane Commissioner under the Sugar Cane (Control) Order, 1966, has been dismissed by the single judge. Feeling unsatisfied by the order passed by the learned single Judge in W.P.No.84435/2013 the appellant M/S. The India
Call for Blogs @ LawClique: Rolling Submissions About Lawclique is a platform to hone one’s legal skills. We believe that “Shradhavan Labate Gnanam”- one can attain knowledge with reverence. We, the future budding lawyers with the experience of working with other knowledge bases created a platform to hone skills by
Subscribe to our newsletter and receive a curated selection of legal updates directly to your inbox.
