Things to Know about the Citizenship Amendment Bill 2019

Must Read

An Insight into Custodial Death in India

“The occurrence of Custodial deaths in the world’s greatest democracy has raised the eyebrows of every citizen and shaken...

Implications in Travel Insurance in Light of the COVID-19 Crisis

As the world, today is crippled by this once in a century pandemic and as of date more than...

Second-Round Effects of Rent Control Laws: The Argentine Case

Introduction In colonial India, a city had an issue with its cobra population, which was a problem clearly in need...

Why Are the Big Techs of Silicon Valley Accused of Anti-Competitive Behaviours?

The big tech giants of the Silicon Valley are facing major challenges with relation to their monopolistic powers after...

KSK announces Sanjay Kumar as a Partner for Pharma & Life Sciences Practice

New Partner for KSK's Pharma & Life Sciences Practice King Stubb & Kasiva recently announced that Mr Sanjay Kumar has...

The Debate Between IPR and Competition Law Explained

There are various market processes or structures that govern market scenario. For simplicity, this paper focuses on two mechanisms:...

Follow us

Amended Sec 2 of The Citizenship Act, 1955

“Provided that any person belonging to Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist, Jain, Parsi or Christian community from Afghanistan, Bangladesh or Pakistan, who entered into India on or before the 31st day of December 2014 and who has been exempted by the Central Government by or under clause (c) of sub-section (2) of section 3 of the Passport (Entry into India) Act, 1920 or from the application of the provisions of the Foreigners Act, 1946 or any rule or order made thereunder, shall not be treated as illegal migrant for the purposes of this Act;”

Overview of the bill

The Citizenship Amendment Bill 2019 (Commonly referred to as CAB) was passed by Parliament of India to provide Citizenship to those people who immigrated mainly from Pakistan, Afghanistan and Bangladesh. There is a history of immigration of people belonging to the Minority Communities from across the borders of India as they wanted to protect themselves against the inhumane treatment in their own country. The people especially who immigrated from Pakistan, Afghanistan and Bangladesh were spoken about under this bill.  When India was partitioned in 1947, Millions of citizens of undivided India belonging to various religions were staying in the Pakistan and Bangladesh. Many people belonging to Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist, Jain, Parsi and Christian communities were ill-treated on grounds of religion in those countries, mainly because the Constitution of Pakistan, Afghanistan and Bangladesh are not secular in nature.  They were restricted to practice their religion; most of them were also ill-treated in their day-to-day life.

Gradually the persecuted people fled to India to seek shelter and continued to stay in India even if their travel documents were expired or with incomplete or no documents. The Citizenship Act, 1955 was enacted to provide for the acquisition and determination of Indian Citizenship. Under the Existing Provisions of the Act, migrants belonging to the Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist, Jain, Parsi or Christian communities from Afghanistan, Pakistan or Bangladesh who entered India without valid travel documents or if the validity of their documents has expired are regarded as illegal migrants and ineligible to apply for Indian Citizenship under Section 5 or Section 6 of the Act.

The Central Government exempted the said migrants from the adverse penal consequences of the Passport (Entry into India) Act, 1920 and the Foreigners Act, 1946. Subsequently, the Central Government also made them eligible for long term visa to stay in India. Since many of them have entered into India long back, they may be given the Citizenship of India from the date of their entry in India if they fulfil conditions for Indian Citizenship specified in Section 5 or the Qualifications for the Naturalization under the provisions of the Third Schedule to the Act.

Now, it is proposed to make the said migrants eligible for Indian Citizenship by amending the Citizenship Act, 1955. The illegal migrants who have entered into India on or before 31.12.2014 need a special regime to own their citizenship. For this purpose, the Central Government shall grant the certificate of registration or Certificate of Naturalization subject to such conditions, restrictions and manner prescribed under the bill.

Section 5, under the provision of the Third Schedule of the Citizenship Act 1955, is amended as the person belonging to Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist, Jain, Parsi or Christian community in Afghanistan, Bangladesh or Pakistan, whose aggregate period of residence or service of Government in India is “not less than five years” instead of “not less than eleven years” bypassing the citizenship amendment bill 2019.

Further Sec 6B has been inserted in the view of instruction to an authority to grant a Certificate of Registration or Certificate of Naturalization to a person who is referred in Amended Sec 2 of The Citizenship Act, 1955 on the application.

The Bill further seeks to protect the constitutional guarantee to original populations of North Eastern States covered under the Sixth Schedule to the Constitution and the statutory protection is given to areas covered under “The Inner Line” system of the Bengal Eastern Frontier Regulation, 1873. As mentioned in Sec 7D of Amended Citizenship Bill 2019.


Contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now. You can also join our Team of Courtroom and regularly contribute case briefs or articles like the above one.

For more Courtroom Updates, check out our Courtroom Page

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding that mens rea is an...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @ Balli v State. The bench...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up testing facilities in Delhi.   Facts of...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has set aside the 24.07.2019 Order...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an order restraining the manufacturing, marketing,...

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work, except the drinking water component...

There Can Be No Leniency Shown To Appellant Who Pleaded To Reduce Sentence: Delhi High Court

Facts On 25.2.2016 the victim’s sister who was 13 years old was present with her sister who was 2 years old (victim) at their home....

Violation of Executive Instructions Cannot Be Sole Ground to Invalidate Transfer Orders: Tripura High Court

In Dr Bithika Choudhury vs the State of Tripura & Ors., a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S.G. Chattopadhyay...

Case Regarding Anticipatory Bail, Applicant May Be Released Imposing Suitable Conditions: Gujarat High Court

A Single-Judge Bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Dr Justice A.P. Thakur had been hearing submissions of the Applicant to release him...

Proof of Infliction of Fatal Injury Not Mandatory for Conviction Under Section 307, IPC: Tripura High Court

In the case of Mamin Miah vs the State of Tripura, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S....

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -