Libertatem News Network

The Kerala High Court in, on 17th September 2015, in the matter of constitutionality of the new Rule introduced via amendment of the Kerala Foreign Liquor Rules dated 9-12-2013, 2015, while deciding the constitutionality of the new Rule 27A and condition 9A under the head Conditions in Forms FL 3

The Delhi High Court in recent decision G.J Singh v. Union of India decided on 10th September 2015 while dealing with the issue as to whether Paramilitary forces are Organized Group “A” Service and benefits by way of NFFU ought to be granted to them, a bench the bench comprising

In Khursheed Ahmad Khan v. State of U.P., the appellant was employed as an Irrigation Supervisor in the Irrigation Department of U.P. Government. He had contracted second marriage during subsistence of the first marriage and was consequently terminated after giving charge sheet. He contended that he had divorced the first

Setting aside the bail given by the High Court, the apex court in Neeru Yadav v. State of U.P. held that extra and special caution is warranted in granting bail to history sheeters involved in heinous crimes. A history-sheeter is an Indian police term for a criminal with a long

Tejram Patil v. State of Maharashtra is certainly one of the landmark cases as law regulation dying declarations. In a notable judgment, a 2 judge bench comprising of Justices Adarsh Kumar Goel and Dipak Misra have given a fresh dimension to the Dying Declaration (DD) Jurisprudence in the country. Via

In the case of S v. Sunil Kumar, wherein Test Identification Parade (TIP) was not held to determine the identity of the offender alleged on committing rape in broad daylight, the apex court has ruled that prior identification by TIP is used to corroborate identification in court and the latter

In the case of U.P State Road Transport Corporation v. Gopal Shukla, decided on 1st September 2015 by the Supreme Court of India presided by the Division bench of Justice Dipak Misra and Justice P.C. Pant, the bench held that no leniency should be taken in matters relating to corruption.

In the case of M. Palanimuthu v. The Secretary to the Government, decided on 7th September 2015 by the Madras High Court presided by the Division bench of Chief Justice S. K. Kaul and Justice T.S. Sivagnanam, the Court dismissed the PIL seeking to ban campus recruitments and restrain the Central and

In the case of Dineshbhai Bhangvanbhai Banbhaniya v. State of Gujarat , decided on 24th September 2015 by the High Court of Gujarat presided by the division bench of Justice M.R. Shah and Justice K.J.Thaker. The Court while delivering an order in a special criminal application with regard to the

In the case of Akhilesh Kumar Singh v. Ram Dawan, decided on 23rd September 2015 by the Supreme Court of India presided by the division bench of  Justice Dipak Misra and Justice P.C. Pant, it was held that the question of reservation will arise only when there is plurality of