Rule Prohibiting Women to Serve Liquor in Licensed Hotels Declared Unconstitutional

Must Read

Madras High Court Observes Unexplained Delay in Procedural Safeguards, Quashes Detention Through Writ Petition

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus. The petitioner P. Lakshmi,...

UK Court of Appeal Rules Home Department’s Deportation Policy of Immigrants Unlawful

Britain’s Court of Appeal quashed the Home Department’s deportation policy, declaring it unlawful; criticizing it for being too stringent...

Inordinate and Unexplained Delay in Considering Representation by Government Renders Detention Order Illegal: Madras High Court

A Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution was filed in the Madras High Court to declare the detention...

Privy Council Clarifies Approach To Winding up in “Deadlock” Cases in the Case of Chu v. Lau

The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council clarified several aspects of the law concerning just and equitable winding-up petitions,...

Madras High Court Directs Hospital To Submit Necessary Medical Reports to Authorization Committee for Approval of Kidney Transplant

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a Writ of Mandamus to K.G. Hospital, Coimbatore by...

Punjab Woman Evokes Petition for Protection Fearing Honour Killing

In the case of Divya Mattu and another vs State of Punjab and others, the petitioner, Divya, fearing honour...

Follow us

The Kerala High Court in, on 17th September 2015, in the matter of constitutionality of the new Rule introduced via amendment of the Kerala Foreign Liquor Rules dated 9-12-2013, 2015, while deciding the constitutionality of the new Rule 27A and condition 9A under the head Conditions in Forms FL 3 introduced via amendment of the Kerala Foreign Liquor Rules dated 9-12-2013 which prohibits women from being employed “in any capacity for serving liquor on the licensed premises’, a bench of D.S. Naidu J held that Rule 27A of Kerala Foreign Liquor Rules as well as condition 9 A under the head Conditions in Forms FL 3 fall foul of the Constitutional scheme of gender equality as has been spelt out in Articles 14, 15 (1) & (2) and 16 (1) & (2) of the Constitution of India, and hence is unconstitutional.

In the instant case, the petitioners (working as waitresses/ bartenders) in a bar attached to FL-3 licensed hotel challenged the new Rule and condition as being ultravires of the Executive on the ground that if the newly incorporated Rule is allowed to hold its field, they will be bound to lose their jobs and thus their livelihood. Thomas Abraham, the learned Counsel for the petitioner contended that by introducing a new Rule 27A as well as condition 9A, the government is taking away the equality of status and opportunity that is guaranteed to women in the Constitution. The Government Pleader submitted that the government has brought about the statutory changes to protect the women from being exposed to dangers in work places.

The Court noted that firstly the government presupposed without any statutory base that employing women to serve liquor in the licensed premises is illegal, and subsequently to justify it with a statutory support, the government amended the Rule and brought the impugned Government Order. The Court stated that “the approach of the government is a classic case of begging the question”. The Court relied on Anuj Garg v. Hotel Assn. of India, (2008) 3 SCC 1, where Supreme Court declared Section 30 of the Punjab Excise Act, 1914 which prohibited employment of women in any premises in which public consume liquor or intoxicating drug as unconstitutional. The Court also relied on Gita Hariharan v. Reserve Bank of India, (1999) 2 SCC 228, where Supreme Court observed that India is a signatory to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, 1979 (“CEDAW”) and the Beijing Declaration, which direct all State parties to take appropriate measures to prevent discrimination of all forms against women and the domestic courts are under an obligation to give due regard to International Conventions and Norms for construing domestic laws when there is no inconsistency between them. Accordingly, the Court declared the Rule and condition prohibiting women from working as Bartenders as unconstitutional.

Latest News

Madras High Court Observes Unexplained Delay in Procedural Safeguards, Quashes Detention Through Writ Petition

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus. The petitioner P. Lakshmi, called for records of the...

UK Court of Appeal Rules Home Department’s Deportation Policy of Immigrants Unlawful

Britain’s Court of Appeal quashed the Home Department’s deportation policy, declaring it unlawful; criticizing it for being too stringent on immigrants to comply with. Background The...

Inordinate and Unexplained Delay in Considering Representation by Government Renders Detention Order Illegal: Madras High Court

A Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution was filed in the Madras High Court to declare the detention order of the husband of...

Privy Council Clarifies Approach To Winding up in “Deadlock” Cases in the Case of Chu v. Lau

The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council clarified several aspects of the law concerning just and equitable winding-up petitions, as well as shareholder disputes...

Madras High Court Directs Hospital To Submit Necessary Medical Reports to Authorization Committee for Approval of Kidney Transplant

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a Writ of Mandamus to K.G. Hospital, Coimbatore by P. Sankar & V. Sobana....

Punjab Woman Evokes Petition for Protection Fearing Honour Killing

In the case of Divya Mattu and another vs State of Punjab and others, the petitioner, Divya, fearing honour killing against her by her...

Punjab Woman Accuses Punjab Police of Keeping Husband in Illegal Custody and Framing Him in a False Case

In the case of Geeta v the State of Punjab, the petitioner evoked a writ petition of habeas corpus as she claimed that her...

Addition of Words as Prefixes or Suffixes Is an Infringement of a Registered Trademark: Delhi High Court

Justice Jayanth Nath allowed the Times Group to use its registered trademark “Newshour”, in the case of Bennett Coleman and Co. Ltd v. ARG Outlier...

Just Because the Deceased Did Not Have License, Does Not Imply He Was Negligent: Chhattisgarh High Court

In the case of Hemlal & Others v. Dayaram & Others, a Single Bench of Chhattisgarh High Court consisting of Justice Sanjay S. Agrawal annunciated various...

Hoardings Are Movable Property Under Section 2(3) of DMC Act Subject To the Twin Test: Delhi High Court

Delhi High Court in the case of Delhi International Airport v South Delhi Metropolitan Corporation discussed in detail the provision under Section 2(3) of the DMC...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -