Devanshi Desai

Excerpt A Criminal Revision Case was filed under Section 397 r/w Section 401 of CrPC to call for entire records on the files of the Executive Magistrate and Deputy Commissioner of Police and set aside the order.  Facts of the case The...

A petition was filed for issuing a writ of mandamus directing the Respondents to consider the Petitioner’s representations on merits to release the outstanding payments for services provided by the Petitioner Institute for NEET coaching and to pass further orders.

The petition was filed concerning the furniture manufacturing unit run by the sixth respondent in the property adjacent to the residential property to the petitioner.

A Petition was filed challenging the stop memos and issue direction to the Secretary of the Panchayat to refrain from obstructing him from erecting the hot mix plant.

A petition was filed under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution for issuing Writ of Certiorari to call for records on the impugned order dated 27.05.2021 on the file of Respondent No. 2 and quash the same as illegal.

A petition was filed for issuing a writ of certiorarified Mandamus for calling of the records of the 4th respondent in the proceedings dated 03.06.2021. It was prayed to quash the proceedings till date, the license fee for the complete lockdown period to COVID-19 pandemic, and direct the respondents to grant a waiver of the license fee from:  1.)24.03.2020 to 06.09.2020  2.)20.02.2021 to the date when the transport services resume and replace, revise and re-fix the license fee in a manner proportionate with the time permitted for vehicle movement from 07.09.2020 in respect of the two-wheeler parking facility at Nachimuthu Maternity Hospital, Pollachi Municipality.  

A petition was filed under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution for issuing a writ of Mandamus for calling of records relating to the order dated 30.01.2017 passed by the 2nd Respondent. It was prayed to quash the same and to consequently forbear 3rd Respondent from interfering with the Petitioner’s right in the property. 

A petition was filed under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution for issuing a writ of Mandamus for calling of records relating to the order dated 30.01.2017 passed by the 2nd Respondent. It was prayed to quash the same and to consequently forbear 3rd Respondent from interfering with the Petitioner’s right in the property. 

The petitioner had prayed in the writ petition for a direction to the Corporation and its officials to ensure that the restoration work of the road was continued and completed only after having removed the existing bituminous road surface and to ensure that the level of the existing road was not increased by the restoration work.

A petition was filed challenging the Exhibit issued stating that the proposal for approval of the Petitioner’s appointment was being returned since the Petitioner was unqualified for appointment to the post when the vacancy was notified. Hence, her appointment was inconsistent with the UGC Minimum Qualifications for Appointment of Teachers and Other Academic Staff in Universities and Colleges and other Measures for the Maintenance of Standards of Higher Education Regulations, 2010.