The Court directed that in light of the prevailing pandemic situation and considering the ratio in the case of Bhagwan Rama Shinde V/s. In the state of Gujarat, it would be apt that the execution of the sentence imposed by the learned Additional Senior Civil Judge, Surat be suspended, pending
Gujarat High Court allows petition in an administrative law case to set aside orders passed by the Deputy Collector whereby the services of the petitioner came to be terminated, without giving the petitioner an opportunity to defend himself.
After considering the impugned order and the report dated 9.3.2015 of the Mediator, Gujarat High Court Mediation Centre, Ahmedabad, the Court directed the Respondent mother to facilitate talk and interaction between father and daughter. Applicant’s Submissions The Learned Advocate for the Applicant submitted that the present matter was for visitation
The Court directed the complainant to avail alternate remedy because the petitioner had not approached the concerned Magistrate and directly approached this Court, praying for issuing the writ of mandamus against the respondent to investigate his case, the present petition was thus rejected. The Court held that the aggrieved must
The Court directed the complainant to avail alternate remedy because the petitioner had not approached the concerned Magistrate and directly approached this Court, praying for issuing the writ of mandamus against the respondent to investigate his case, the present petition was thus rejected. The Court held that the aggrieved must
The Court interpreted the aspect of notice of security interest under SAEFAESI Act, being void-ab-initio, as security was found to be in nature of provisions under Indian Contract Act, 1872, and hence provided interim protection to the Petitioners, until the next hearing date.
In this case, the authority concerned was directed by the Court to release the vehicle of the petitioner on certain terms and conditions.
In this case, the Court directed that in light of the principle of law laid down by the Supreme Court, that the recovery of an amount from the retiral dues of the petitioner was illegal.
The present suit, along with the Judge’s Order was moved ex-parte. The urgent relief sought was the arrest of the Defendant Vessel, on an apprehension that if not arrested, it may sail out of the jurisdiction of this Court, without payment of Plaintiff’s dues. Brief Facts The present suit was
The present petition was filed to get some irregularities corrected in the preparation of Voter List. The Court observed that it would be an intermediate stage in the process of election, hence Petitioner could file an election petition once the elections got over. The present petition was thus dismissed. Background
Subscribe to our newsletter and receive a curated selection of legal updates directly to your inbox.
