Gujarat High Court Rejects Prayer to Issue a Writ of Mandamus, Directs Complainant to Avail Alternate Remedy

Must Read

WhatsApp Emails Delhi HC Judge Asking Her Not To Hear the Plea Challenging New Privacy Policy

The Delhi High Court raised strong objection to an E-mail sent by WhatsApp asking a judge not to hear the plea which challenges its new privacy policy. Justice Pratibha Singh said that the e-mail that was withdrawn later was totally unwarranted as she was anyway going to recuse from hearing the plea which was filed by Rohilla Chaitanya who contends that the new privacy policy of WhatsApp provides 360-degree access to a customer’s virtual activity and is against the fundamental right of privacy.

TRP Scam Case: Bombay HC Extends Protection To Arnab Goswami and Other Employees Till the Next Hearing

On Friday, the Bombay High court extended the protection that was given, to Republic TV’s Editor in Chief Arnab Goswami and other employees of ARG Outlier Media Private Limited till January 29th in the alleged case of Television Rating Point manipulation. A status report was submitted by the police to the division bench of Justices S.S.Shinde and Manish Pitale by the Police on the ongoing case.

Plea Seeks FIR Against Maharashtra Minister Dhananjay Munde in Bombay HC for False Info

A plea has been filed in Bombay High Court seeking an FIR against Maharashtra minister Dhananjay Munde who is undergoing times of trouble due to his extra-marital affair. Recently, an FIR had been lodged against Munde by a woman, accusing him of raping her sister. Munde clarified that he was actually in a relationship with that woman and had two children. He accused the two women of blackmailing him.

Writ Petition for Compensation Accepted by Calcutta High Court 

Introduction The Petitioner Purna Ch. Biswas filed a Writ Petition with the complaint that their claims for a higher quantum...

No Members Could Be Disqualified Without Authorisation by Political Party: Gujarat High Court

Excerpt The dispute application no.7 of 2020 filed by respondent no.2 before designated authority. Thereafter the designated authority order dated...

Delhi High Court Directs Delhi Jal Board To Make Supply of Potable Drinking Water

The High Court of Delhi in the matter of Delhi Sainik Cooperation Housing Ltd. v. Union of India &...

Follow us

The Court directed the complainant to avail alternate remedy because the petitioner had not approached the concerned Magistrate and directly approached this Court, praying for issuing the writ of mandamus against the respondent to investigate his case, the present petition was thus rejected. The Court held that the aggrieved must avail of his alternate remedy to approach the concerned Magistrate under Section 156(3) CrPC.

Petitioner’s Submissions

Learned Advocate for the petitioner had submitted that the respondent authorities had not investigated the present matter and also threatened him to sign some compromise papers. He had contended that in the present case, the offence under Section 306 of IPC was hence, established and a written complaint was thus given by the complainant, but nothing was done in that regard and no FIR was registered.

Petitioner’s Prayers

By way of the present petition, the petitioner had prayed for a relief to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or directions, directing the respondents to register the petitioner’s complaint as FIR and investigate the same in a fair and unbiased manner.

Court’s Observations

The Court observed that similar issues had been adjudicated before, which could be referred to, like the case of Sakiri Vasu v. State of Uttar Pradesh And Others in which it was held that if someone had any grievance that his FIR was not being registered by the police station, under Section 154 of CrPC, then he could approach the Superintendent of Police under Section 154(3) CrPC by a written application. Even if that won’t yield any satisfactory result, the aggrieved person could file an application under Section 156(3) CrPC before the learned Magistrate concerned. The Magistrate can then direct the FIR to be registered and a proper investigation to be made, in a case where, according to the complainant, no proper investigation was made.

It was also observed that it was a well-settled fact that when any such power was expressly granted by a statute, there would also be impliedly included in the grant, every such power and control, the denial of which would render that grant itself ineffective. So, where an Act conferred such jurisdiction, it impliedly also granted further, the power of carrying out all such acts as were essential for carrying out its execution.

Court’s Directions

The Court was of the view that if the High Courts keep entertaining all such writ petitions, then they will be flooded only with such writ petitions and won’t be able to carry out any other work except dealing with such writ petitions. Therefore, the Court held that the complainant in the present case must avail of his alternate remedy of approaching the Magistrate under Section 156(3) of CrPC and if he would do so, the Magistrate will have to ensure, if prima facie he was satisfied, registration of the FIR and also ensure proper investigation in the present matter.

In the present circumstances, the Court had set aside the direction of the High Court for registration of the FIR and investigation into the present matter by the police authorities. At the same time, it was stated that the order wouldn’t impede in the way of the first respondent, filing documents and papers with the police according to the said complaint dated 18.09.2008 and the police authorities on being satisfied that a criminal offence was made out would have the liberty to register an FIR. It would be open for the respondent to approach the Court of the Metropolitan Magistrate if deemed necessary and appropriate. Moreover, it will be equally open to the appellants and others to take steps to protect their interests.

In the present case, the petitioner had not approached the concerned Magistrate and rather, had directly approached this High Court for the aforesaid prayer. Under such circumstances and in light of the observations made by the Apex Court, the present writ petition was rejected.

Click here to read the Judgment


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the Court. Follow us on Google NewsInstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

WhatsApp Emails Delhi HC Judge Asking Her Not To Hear the Plea Challenging New Privacy Policy

The Delhi High Court raised strong objection to an E-mail sent by WhatsApp asking a judge not to hear the plea which challenges its new privacy policy. Justice Pratibha Singh said that the e-mail that was withdrawn later was totally unwarranted as she was anyway going to recuse from hearing the plea which was filed by Rohilla Chaitanya who contends that the new privacy policy of WhatsApp provides 360-degree access to a customer’s virtual activity and is against the fundamental right of privacy.

TRP Scam Case: Bombay HC Extends Protection To Arnab Goswami and Other Employees Till the Next Hearing

On Friday, the Bombay High court extended the protection that was given, to Republic TV’s Editor in Chief Arnab Goswami and other employees of ARG Outlier Media Private Limited till January 29th in the alleged case of Television Rating Point manipulation. A status report was submitted by the police to the division bench of Justices S.S.Shinde and Manish Pitale by the Police on the ongoing case.

Plea Seeks FIR Against Maharashtra Minister Dhananjay Munde in Bombay HC for False Info

A plea has been filed in Bombay High Court seeking an FIR against Maharashtra minister Dhananjay Munde who is undergoing times of trouble due to his extra-marital affair. Recently, an FIR had been lodged against Munde by a woman, accusing him of raping her sister. Munde clarified that he was actually in a relationship with that woman and had two children. He accused the two women of blackmailing him.

Writ Petition for Compensation Accepted by Calcutta High Court 

Introduction The Petitioner Purna Ch. Biswas filed a Writ Petition with the complaint that their claims for a higher quantum of compensation have not yet...

No Members Could Be Disqualified Without Authorisation by Political Party: Gujarat High Court

Excerpt The dispute application no.7 of 2020 filed by respondent no.2 before designated authority. Thereafter the designated authority order dated 28.10.2020 disqualified the petitioner and...

Delhi High Court Directs Delhi Jal Board To Make Supply of Potable Drinking Water

The High Court of Delhi in the matter of Delhi Sainik Cooperation Housing Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors held that right to...

Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders Security To BJP Leader Alleged for Not Supporting Farmers Protest

The Order had come in the form of a Writ Petition filed by Tikshan Sood under Article 226 of the Constitution. The petition before...

Lahore High Court Outlaws Two-Finger Virginity Test

The Lahore High Court in Pakistan has outlawed the use and conduct of virginity tests, namely, the use of the “two-finger” virginity test and...

London Court Rejects Assange’s Extradition – What Happens Now? 

Earlier last week, District Judge Vanessa Baraitser, sitting in the Westminster Magistrates’ Court denied the Government of the U.S.A.'s request to the U.K. to...

Calcutta High Court Decides in Favor of Contractor as He Accidentally Pays an Excessively High Amount

Introduction The present writ petition has been filed for a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondents to revoke the Petitioner’s offer as...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -