Bombay HC Passes Interim Order and Waives Notice of Security Interest

Must Read

SC: Under-21 Convicts Can Be Given Less Than Minimum Sentence, Resorts To Probation of Offenders Act

The Supreme Court resorted to the Probation of Offenders Act to sidestep the mandate under Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code that mentions a sentence of not less than 7 years to those convicted of armed robbery, to give a chance to two young convicts to reform their lives.

Environment Protection Act Passed at the Instance of Foreign Powers: NHAI in Karnataka HC

The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) claimed in a submission that the Environment Protection Act 1986 was passed not only for the protection of the environment by the parliament but also at the instance of foreign powers. This statement was made while referring to a UN conference and got the NHAI into great trouble in the Karnataka High Court.

Delhi High Court To Implement a Hybrid System Through Virtual and Physical Hearing

On Friday the Delhi High Court said that they have initiated steps to implement a mode wherein hearing can be done by virtual as well as physical mode. The Delhi High Court is aiming to implement the Hybrid mode. It stated that when the particular bench is conducting a virtual hearing the lawyer may opt for this mode after giving prior intimation about the same.

Mercy Plea of Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Case To Be Decided in Four Weeks, TN Governor To Supreme Court

Tamil Nadu Governor Banwarilal Purohit on Thursday told the Supreme Court that a decision on the mercy petition of one of the convicts serving a life sentence for the assassination of former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, AG Perarivalan will be taken within four weeks. The petition has been pending with the Governor since December 30, 2015.

Bombay High Court Questions FIR Over Journalist Alleged of Communist Comment on WhatsApp

An FIR lodged against the editor of Marathi newspaper, Rajkumar Chhajed has been questioned by the Bombay High Court. The Maharashtra Police has accused Chhajed of creating a rift between the two communities based on a WhatsApp message.

Allahabad High Court Expresses Dissatisfaction on Counsels Seeking Unnecessary Adjournments

The petition had been filed by Smt. Radha prayed to issue directions to Judicial Magistrate-I in Faizabad. The petition...

Follow us

Division Bench of Bombay High Court comprising of Justice S.B. Shukre and Avinash G. Gharote passed an interim order on 11th December, 2020 in the case of M/s. Radha Ispat and others vs. The State of Maharashtra and others, in which the Court interpreted the aspect of notice of security interest under SAEFAESI Act, being void-ab-initio, as security was found to be in nature of provisions under Indian Contract Act, 1872, and hence provided interim protection to the Petitioners, until the next hearing date.

Petitioner’s Submissions

Shri Gulia, Learned Counsel for the Petitioners had contended that though the security interest as created in favour of Respondent nos.5 and 6 was in the nature of Nazul land, and was not subjected to any of the attachment under the provisions of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. It was also submitted that order to that effect was already passed, but such an order was without any jurisdiction. Reliance was thus placed upon the observations made in the judgment, delivered by a learned Single Judge Bench of Delhi High Court as in the case of Vishal Builders (P) Ltd. vs. Delhi Development Authority and also in the case of Narain Prasad Aggrawal vs. State of Madhya Pradesh. It was further submitted by him that all the loan agreements, guarantees and continuing guarantees, etc. between Petitioner nos.1 to 5 on one hand and the Respondent no.6 on the other, had been executed as under the provisions of Sections 126127128 and 172 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 and the bar of Section 31 of the SARFAESI Act got applied.

Petitioner’s Prayers

The prayer of the learned Counsel for the Petitioners was that notice as served upon the Petitioners, under Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act by Respondent no.6 Bank was to be declared void-ab-initio. Moreover, another prayer of the Petitioners was that such agreements being in the nature of security as given under the provisions of Indian Contract Act, 1872, thus all the loan transactions in the present case would be out of the purview of the SARFAESI Act.

Court’s Directions

So far as the second contention was concerned, relating to the applicability of bar under Section 31 of the SARFAESI Act to the loan transactions in the present case, Court had its own doubts. But, so far as the first contention was concerned, which was about the non- saleability of the Nazul land, the Court found that the proposition was needed to be perused and examined at length by this Court, especially in light of the observations in the above-stated cases of Vishal Builders (P) Ltd. vs. Delhi Development Authority (supra) and the case of Narain Prasad Aggrawal vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (supra).

The Court opined that an issue notice to the Respondents for final disposal of the matter, at the admission stage, must be returnable on 19/1/2021 and in the meantime, by way of an interim order by the Court, it was directed that no coercive action could be taken against the petitioners and the securities were subjected to the condition that the petitioners shall deposit in this Court, a total amount of rupees six crore fifty lakhs, which won’t be disputed by the Petitioners.

Further, interim protection was granted to the Petitioners, which would operate till the next date, i.e., 19/1/2021. It shall also be subject to another condition that if there would be even a single default, the same shall lead to the automatic vacating of the interim relief so granted by this Court and that would even be without any reference to the Court and along with cost of one lakh rupees.

Click here to read the interim order.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgment from courts. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

SC: Under-21 Convicts Can Be Given Less Than Minimum Sentence, Resorts To Probation of Offenders Act

The Supreme Court resorted to the Probation of Offenders Act to sidestep the mandate under Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code that mentions a sentence of not less than 7 years to those convicted of armed robbery, to give a chance to two young convicts to reform their lives.

Environment Protection Act Passed at the Instance of Foreign Powers: NHAI in Karnataka HC

The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) claimed in a submission that the Environment Protection Act 1986 was passed not only for the protection of the environment by the parliament but also at the instance of foreign powers. This statement was made while referring to a UN conference and got the NHAI into great trouble in the Karnataka High Court.

Delhi High Court To Implement a Hybrid System Through Virtual and Physical Hearing

On Friday the Delhi High Court said that they have initiated steps to implement a mode wherein hearing can be done by virtual as well as physical mode. The Delhi High Court is aiming to implement the Hybrid mode. It stated that when the particular bench is conducting a virtual hearing the lawyer may opt for this mode after giving prior intimation about the same.

Mercy Plea of Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Case To Be Decided in Four Weeks, TN Governor To Supreme Court

Tamil Nadu Governor Banwarilal Purohit on Thursday told the Supreme Court that a decision on the mercy petition of one of the convicts serving a life sentence for the assassination of former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, AG Perarivalan will be taken within four weeks. The petition has been pending with the Governor since December 30, 2015.

Bombay High Court Questions FIR Over Journalist Alleged of Communist Comment on WhatsApp

An FIR lodged against the editor of Marathi newspaper, Rajkumar Chhajed has been questioned by the Bombay High Court. The Maharashtra Police has accused Chhajed of creating a rift between the two communities based on a WhatsApp message.

Allahabad High Court Expresses Dissatisfaction on Counsels Seeking Unnecessary Adjournments

The petition had been filed by Smt. Radha prayed to issue directions to Judicial Magistrate-I in Faizabad. The petition sought a speedy decision in...

[Delhi Riots] When the IT Ministry Calls Us, We Will Go Says Harish Salve To Delhi High Court

The Vice President and Managing Director of Facebook, Ajit Mohan told the Supreme Court that when the representatives of the company are called by the Information Technology Ministry they will come and record their statements.

Allahabad High Court Seeks Response on Compensation of Cutting Trees From National Highways Authority of India (Nhai) 

The Order had come in the form of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by a bunch of law students in Uttar Pradesh. The...

Doctrine of Proportionality Must Adhere to Reasonableness Principal Test: Madras High Court

Young Men's Christian Association built a commercial complex and leased it without having due permission. The District Collector & Tahsildar issued a show-cause notice...

Delhi High Court Refuses To Stay Release of ‘The White Tiger’ on the OTT Platform Netflix

A plea requesting a stay on the release of the film ‘The White Tiger’ by the American producer, John Hart Jr. alleging copyright violation was rejected by the Delhi High Court on Thursday.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -