Khushi Chopra

The High Court heard the matter where disputes had arisen between the parties from their partnership deed. The Court directed that, in light of the arbitration clause of the partnership agreement, both the parties had to refer to a sole arbitrator. Hence, accordingly, all the disputes were referred to the

The Division Bench of Bombay High Court consisting of Justice S.S. Shinde and Madhav Jayajirao Jamdar passed an order on 17th November 2020 in the case of Kum. Vaidehee Prakash Arekar vs State of Maharashtra and Ors., in which the petition was filed to pray that the tribe claim was to be

The Madhya Pradesh High Court heard the matter where the Petitioner had filed a Writ Petition in nature of Habeas Corpus and contented that no Order had been passed since his detention. Thus, the Court directed that the Petitioner shall be free to file a bail application under the provisions

The Court adjudicated the matter, in Rakesh Kumar Shrivastav & Ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors., where the application was filed regarding the benefits to be given to an employee after having been conferred the status of a permanent employee. It considered the identical contempt petitions already been

The applicant was arrested for committing certain offences punishable under IPC. The Court had dismissed on merits, applicant’s first application for bail. Later, the Court perused the record of the case and considering the fact that due to Covid-19 pandemic, the trial couldn’t be concluded in the near future, the

The present Petition was filed before the Gujarat High Court to get a grievance addressed, that despite there being a fixed time schedule framed by the statute to decide an application made under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, it

A single-judge bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Mr Justice A.Y. Kogje reviewed the report, as submitted by the Official Liquidator of the M/s. Neptune Equipment Pvt. Ltd. for the liquidation of the said company. Considering the provisions of Section 481 of the Companies Act,1956, the affairs of the

KLT Automotive and Tubular Products Limited filed a writ petition with the primary contention that interest is to be levied only on the net tax liability and not on gross liability. The Court took into consideration the amendment made to Section 50 of the CGST Act and a press release

  KLT Automotive and Tubular Products Limited filed a writ petition with the primary contention that interest is levied only on the net tax liability and not on gross liability. The Court took into consideration the amendment made to Section 50 of the CGST Act and a press release issued

Division Bench of Bombay High Court consisting of Justice S. V. Gangapurwala and Justice Shrikant D. Kulkarni had passed an Order on 25th October 2020, by clarifying and modifying its previous Order dated 23rd October 2020. It had allowed the Petitioner to conduct Dussehra procession on three open trucks, as