On the basis of an interim order which had been passed by the Singapore International Arbitration Centre, Reliance Retail- Future Deal filed a plea in the High Court of the Capital, in order to retrain Amazon in participating/interfering in its future business.
The Bench directed the state to deposit the compensation amount within 45 days from the date of order. The court also stated that the state was allowed to ask the accused to pay the compensation amount if it wanted to and to proceed against the respondents, the Police Commissioner at the time of relevance, and the Sub-Inspector of Police.
The court said that ‘CRIMINAL LAW SHOULD NOT BECOME A TOOL FOR SELECTIVE HARASSMENT OF CITIZENS’
While pointing out the fact that different names on documents will cause unwanted hardships to both of the parties, Allahabad HC issued a notice and directed CBSE to change the name of the petitioner to ‘Kabir Jaiswal alias/nee Rishu Jaiswal’ in their current records and to issue a new certificate to Kabir Jaiswal within 2 months of the order.
The courtroom war between Tata Sons and Cyrus Mistry has reached its 7th day in the courtroom, with continuous hearings, without rest, by both the parties.
well-known stand-up comedian, Kunal Kamra, posted a number of tweets criticizing the Supreme Court. As Kunal Kamra stood by his tweets, three consecutive petitions were filed in the Supreme Court against the comedian on December 17’ 2020, seeking contempt of court action.
In accordance with the violation of the Covid-19 norms by Tablighi Jamaat participants at Nizamuddin Markaz, the Delhi High Court acquitted several foreign nationals in this criminal case.
Delhi High Court on Thursday held that the absence of eyewitness in sexual harassment cases in the workplace do not decrease the credibility of such a complaint.
The suit was filed by a Muslim woman in the Allahabad High Court, after she changed her religion from Islam to Hindu, in order to marry a Hindu man. She sought the law’s shelter in order to refrain the state from interfering in her peaceful and happy, married life.
Supreme Court held that the right of a woman to secure a residence order in respect of a shared household cannot be defeated by the simple expedient of securing an order of eviction by adopting the summary procedure under the Senior Citizens Act
Subscribe to our newsletter and receive a curated selection of legal updates directly to your inbox.
