Tablighi Jamaat Foreign attendees prosecuted maliciously on the orders by Home Ministry: Delhi HC

Must Read

Lahore High Court Outlaws Two-Finger Virginity Test

The Lahore High Court in Pakistan has outlawed the use and conduct of virginity tests, namely, the use of...

London Court Rejects Assange’s Extradition – What Happens Now? 

Earlier last week, District Judge Vanessa Baraitser, sitting in the Westminster Magistrates’ Court denied the Government of the U.S.A.'s...

Calcutta High Court Decides in Favor of Contractor as He Accidentally Pays an Excessively High Amount

Introduction The present writ petition has been filed for a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondents to...

Petition Filed in Delhi High Court Challenging the New Privacy Policy of WhatsApp

A petition has been raised before the Delhi High Court challenging the updated privacy policy of the instant messaging app, WhatsApp. It is accused of looking into the virtual activities of the users,

Bombay High Court Says Pleas Against the Rejection of Nomination Before the Polls Is Not Maintainable

Bombay High Court on Wednesday held that a candidate cannot challenge his nomination by filing a writ petition before a court prior to the polls after his nominations have already been rejected by the Returning Officer (RO) for the Panchayat elections of January 15.

Bombay HC: It Will Be Difficult if Civic Bodies Don’t Take Action on Illegal Constructions

The Bombay High Court said on Wednesday that if the Municipal Corporations do not take action on the illegal constructions, things will become very difficult. This observation was made by a bench comprising Chief Justice Dipankar Dutta and Justice Girish Kulkarni while hearing a PIL after the Bhiwandi building collapse on September 21st, 2020 which led to the death of 39 lives. Mumbai Thane, Ulhasnagar, Kalyan-Dombivli, Vasai-Virar, Navi Mumbai, and Bhiwandi-Nizampur corporations were filed as respondents.

Follow us

In accordance with the violation of the Covid-19 norms by Tablighi Jamaat participants at Nizamuddin Markaz, the Delhi High Court acquitted several foreign nationals in this criminal case. The mentioned foreign nationals belong to some 10 different countries, including the United States of America as well as Russia.

The judgement was held after the prosecution had failed to prove that the accused was present at the relevant time at the relevant place in the case of State v. Mohammed Jamal; State v. Kuvanchbek Abakirov.

Brief facts

The present case had been registered at the PS Crime Branch on March 31’ 2020, in the pursuance of the complaint registered against Inspector Mukesh Walia, New Delhi, under s.3 of the Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897, sections 51 and 58 of the Disaster Management Act, 2005 and sections 188/ 269/ 270/ 271/ 120 B under IPC. (Penalty violation (s.188 of IPC); (punishment for obstruction (s.51 of DMA, 1005) etc.)

Initially, some 8 people were accused but later, there was the filing of as many as 48 charge sheets and 11 supplementary charge sheets arraying 952 foreign nationals as accused of the alleged commission of offense u/s 14.

However, after filing and defiling of many charge sheets, some 5 accused were, by end of the entire process, were detained and charged under Section 3 of the Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897, Section 51 f Disaster Management Act, 2005, Section 188 and Section 269 of IPC.

By the same order, the accused were discharged of the offenses punishable under s.14(b) of Foreigner act, 1946, and for the offenses punishable under s. 270/ 271 under IPC.

In the view of the contradictions in the arguments by the prosecution. Justice Arun Kumar Garg, Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Saket Courts, remarked,

The accused were picked up from different places so as to maliciously prosecute them upon directions from Ministry of home affairs, Govt. of India” was ‘reasonably probable’.”

The court held that the prosecution failed to establish as well prove that the accused were present at the relevant place at the relevant time. The court further stated that the prosecution also failed to prove the disobedience of any kind, which might have been contained in the order as there has been no proof of that accused presence at Markaz during the relevant time period.

While considering the absence of proof, the court further ruled that the offense under s.269 has not been proved since none of the accused showed any of the Covid-19 symptoms at the time of their alleged evacuation.

“..even if it is assumed for the sake of argument that some of the accused are proved to have been found Covid 19 positive on different dates i.e. 01.04.2020, 09.04.2020 and 10.04.2020, in the absence of any symptoms at the time of their alleged stay at Markaz, they can’t be said to have been indulged in the commission of any negligent act likely to spread infection,”

the Court added.

The charges under s.3 of the Epidemic Diseases Act of 1897 and s. 51 of the Disaster Management Act of 2005 was also not proven, hence, the charges under these sections were removed by the court from the accused as well and he was acquitted due to lack of evidence of the accused presence.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgement from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also contribute blog, articles, story tip, judgment and many more and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Lahore High Court Outlaws Two-Finger Virginity Test

The Lahore High Court in Pakistan has outlawed the use and conduct of virginity tests, namely, the use of the “two-finger” virginity test and...

London Court Rejects Assange’s Extradition – What Happens Now? 

Earlier last week, District Judge Vanessa Baraitser, sitting in the Westminster Magistrates’ Court denied the Government of the U.S.A.'s request to the U.K. to...

Calcutta High Court Decides in Favor of Contractor as He Accidentally Pays an Excessively High Amount

Introduction The present writ petition has been filed for a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondents to revoke the Petitioner’s offer as...

Petition Filed in Delhi High Court Challenging the New Privacy Policy of WhatsApp

A petition has been raised before the Delhi High Court challenging the updated privacy policy of the instant messaging app, WhatsApp. It is accused of looking into the virtual activities of the users,

Bombay High Court Says Pleas Against the Rejection of Nomination Before the Polls Is Not Maintainable

Bombay High Court on Wednesday held that a candidate cannot challenge his nomination by filing a writ petition before a court prior to the polls after his nominations have already been rejected by the Returning Officer (RO) for the Panchayat elections of January 15.

Bombay HC: It Will Be Difficult if Civic Bodies Don’t Take Action on Illegal Constructions

The Bombay High Court said on Wednesday that if the Municipal Corporations do not take action on the illegal constructions, things will become very difficult. This observation was made by a bench comprising Chief Justice Dipankar Dutta and Justice Girish Kulkarni while hearing a PIL after the Bhiwandi building collapse on September 21st, 2020 which led to the death of 39 lives. Mumbai Thane, Ulhasnagar, Kalyan-Dombivli, Vasai-Virar, Navi Mumbai, and Bhiwandi-Nizampur corporations were filed as respondents.

Uttarakhand High Court Directed State Authorities To Frame SOP Regarding Kumbh Mela 2021

Noticing the commencement date of Kumbh Mela 2021 amid pandemic from 27 February 2021, the Uttarakhand High Court on Monday expressed concern with regard to organizing and conducting of the Mela and directed State Authorities to discuss and resolve the logistical problems which can come in organizing the Mela during the pandemic time.

Writ Petition Not Maintainable Against Mahindra Finance, Being a Purely Private Body: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court reiterated that Writ Petition against the purely private body is not maintainable and dismissed the petition which was filed against Mahindra Finance Bank as Arif Khan v. Branch Manager Mahindra Finance Sultanpur & Another.

Publication of Notices for Inter-Faith Marriages No Longer Mandatory: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court has passed a landmark judgment that likely brings relief to inter-faith marriage. The Court on Wednesday said that the mandatory publication of Notices of Inter-Faith marriages will now be optional to protect the Privacy and Liberty of the Couple. The Court observed that the publication of the notice would “invade the fundamental rights of liberty and privacy”. Therefore, it has made it optional for the couple, they can now request in form of writing to a marriage officer to publish or not to publish a notice regarding the marriage.

Bombay High Court to NIA: Consider Health and Age of Varavara Rao Before Opposing His Bail Plea

The Bombay HC on Wednesday observed that ‘we are all humans’ and asked the National Investigation Agency and the Maharashtra Government to consider the health and age of the Telugu poet-activist Varavara Rao before making submissions in response to his bail plea application on medical grounds.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -