Dhwani Pandya

A petition has been filed in Gujarat High Court for cancellation of Semester End Exams by Institute of Law, Nirma University. Petitioner is a final year student of the said institute and hopes that the exams get cancelled. ILNU has responded.

The brief facts of the case are that the Petitioners say that the Gujarat Industrial Development Corporation (GIDC) has been created under the Act with the object to secure orderly development of industries, that an industrial estate had been...

The Appellant- Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS) called in question the order dated 16.3.2018 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ("the Tribunal") for the assessment year 2010-11. The High Court was faced with the substantial question of law,...

This suit had been taken by the court on “urgent circulation” in relation to an urgent interim order. The brief facts are that on or around 16 October 2019, the Plaintiff was approached by One Mr Zhang from IMC...

In a recent application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for regular bail in connection with FIR being of 2019 registered with CID Crime Border Zone Police Station, Kutch Bhuj for various grave offences,...

In this case, Tirupati Enterprise Thru ... vs Joint Charity Commissioner, Letters Patent Appeal (an appeal from a decision of a single judge to another bench of the same court) had been preferred “assailing the correctness of the judgment...

In the case of Prafulbhai Balwantbhai Rathod vs District Development Officer, the brief facts state that the Petitioner, who was working as Sarpanch of Atodara Grampanchayat, in the Dist. Surat, Gujarat, was removed by the Respondent by an order...

The report under Section 481 (Dissolution Of Company) of the Companies Act, 1956, filed by the Official Liquidator (OL), prays for the dissolution of the company named Nachmo Trading Co. Ltd. (in liquidation), which was ordered to be wound...

Here in the Petition that was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the prayer of the petitioner was that Respondent i.e. District Magistrate is not deciding Misc. Application of 2018 filed under Section 14 (Chief Metropolitan...

The Air Liquide India Holding Private (Petitioner) had challenged the impugned order (2016) passed by Collector of Electricity Duty (Second Respondent) at Gandhinagar, where an exemption from payment of electricity duty under the Gujarat Electricity Duty Act, 1958 (here­in­after...