Gujarat HC Orders the arrest of Vessel as an Interim Order, on the plea of the aggrieved Plaintiff

Must Read

Federal Court Denied Involvement of US Department of Justice in Trump’s Defamation Lawsuit

Background  The Plaintiff, E .Jean Carroll, published a book where she wrote that a businessman, Donald J Trump had raped...

SC Stays Order Restraining Physical Campaigns in the Madhya Pradesh Bye-Elections

On the 26th of October, a Bench was set up which comprised Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, and...

Lawsuit Filed Against Uber for Discriminatory “Star Rating System”

The lawsuit was bought in the District Court of North California against Uber. The plaintiff claims class-action status on...

Bombay High Court To Hear Plea Seeking Removal of Chairperson of National Commission for Women

A Writ Petition had been filed in the Bombay High Court challenging the conduct of the Chairperson of the...

Bombay High Court Passes Order To Clarify and Modify Previous Order When State of Maharashtra Moved Praecipe

Division Bench of Bombay High Court consisting of Justice S. V. Gangapurwala and Justice Shrikant D. Kulkarni had passed...

The European Court of Human Rights Orders Germany To Pay Non-Pecuniary Damages for Prison Strip-Searches 

A serving German prisoner was repeatedly stripped searched for non-legitimate purposes. The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) found...

Follow us

This suit had been taken by the court on “urgent circulation” in relation to an urgent interim order. The brief facts are that on or around 16 October 2019, the Plaintiff was approached by One Mr Zhang from IMC Shipping Co. Pte. Ltd. acting on behalf of the Defendant Vessel, for the supply of “Bunkers” at Lagos between 25 October 2019 – 30 October 2019. That the Plaintiff agreed and confirmed to supply on its General terms and Conditions, and soon completed pre-supply formalities and loaded Bunkers, however suddenly Mr Zhang acting for the Defendant Vessel,  cancelled the supply for bunkers to the due to which Plaintiff had to bear all necessary cost i.e. transportation cost. The Plaintiff raised an Invoice for an amount of USD 52,200 and waited for payment, it was noted that till date no payment had been received, as the supply is dealt by the Plaintiff’ General Terms and Conditions which also provides for cancellation fees and also for the dispute to be resolved through Arbitration, the Plaintiff is inclined to commence Arbitration. But the Defendant Vessel is presently at Mundra Port and likely to sail away on completion of cargo operations and the present suit is filed for action in rem and also for security pending Arbitration, and inter alia prayed for the arrest of the Defendant Vessel.

Court’s Decision

The Court ordered the Registrar of the Court to issue a warrant for the arrest of the Defendant’s vessel, MV Grand Hermes along with her hull, engines, gears, tackles, bunkers, machinery, apparel, plant, furniture’s, equipment and all appurtenances, at present lying Mundra Port within the Indian territorial waters, and that the Port Officer and the Customs Authorities at Mundra Port do effect the arrest, seizure or detention of the Defendant Vessel. The Court further ordered that those interested in the depositing of the Vessel due to the cost of the Cancellation fee of USD 52,200 plus costs Arbitration amounting to USD 100,000 as per the Maritime Law of the United States, Title 9 of the United States Code, and the Uniform Commercial Code as applied in New York plus USD 5,000 for the cost of litigation in India aggregating USD 157,200 with further interest at the rate of 2% per month from the date of suit till its realisation as per particulars of claim.

[googlepdf url=”http://libertatem.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/AS102020_GJHC240200632020_1_17032020_watermark.pdf” download=”Download Judgement PDF” ]


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Federal Court Denied Involvement of US Department of Justice in Trump’s Defamation Lawsuit

Background  The Plaintiff, E .Jean Carroll, published a book where she wrote that a businessman, Donald J Trump had raped her in a dressing room,...

SC Stays Order Restraining Physical Campaigns in the Madhya Pradesh Bye-Elections

On the 26th of October, a Bench was set up which comprised Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, and Justice Sanjiv Khanna. They heard...

Lawsuit Filed Against Uber for Discriminatory “Star Rating System”

The lawsuit was bought in the District Court of North California against Uber. The plaintiff claims class-action status on behalf of all the minority...

Bombay High Court To Hear Plea Seeking Removal of Chairperson of National Commission for Women

A Writ Petition had been filed in the Bombay High Court challenging the conduct of the Chairperson of the National Commission for Women. The...

Bombay High Court Passes Order To Clarify and Modify Previous Order When State of Maharashtra Moved Praecipe

Division Bench of Bombay High Court consisting of Justice S. V. Gangapurwala and Justice Shrikant D. Kulkarni had passed an Order on 25th October...

The European Court of Human Rights Orders Germany To Pay Non-Pecuniary Damages for Prison Strip-Searches 

A serving German prisoner was repeatedly stripped searched for non-legitimate purposes. The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) found that Germany had violated the...

Lack of Independent Witness Doesn’t Vitiate Conviction: Supreme Court

A three-judge Bench of the Supreme Court in Rajesh Dhiman v State of Himachal Pradesh clarified the law in case of lack of independent...

Madras High Court Observes Unexplained Delay in Procedural Safeguards, Quashes Detention Through Writ Petition

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus. The petitioner P. Lakshmi, called for records of the...

UK Court of Appeal Rules Home Department’s Deportation Policy of Immigrants Unlawful

Britain’s Court of Appeal quashed the Home Department’s deportation policy, declaring it unlawful; criticizing it for being too stringent on immigrants to comply with. Background The...

Supreme Court Stays Order Restraining Physical Campaigns in the Madhya Pradesh Bye-Elections

On the 26th of October, a Bench was set up which comprised Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, and Justice Sanjiv Khanna. They heard...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -