Dhwani Pandya

In this Case, Multiple Petitions were filed by the Railway Authorities, in the proceedings initiated under the provisions of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 (“the PPE Act” for short). The dispute pertains to unauthorised construction of shops and encroachment on the land belonging to Railways and

In the Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioners contend for their entitlement to the “benefits of regularisation on completion of three years of service on the date of which they completed 720 days of employment in three years with the corporation.” Arguments before the

Facts of the Case A petition under Article-226 of the Constitution of India, in the case of Deputy Engineer (O and M) vs Rashmik Nemchand Shah, was filed for challenging the judgment and order dated 28.12.2015 passed by the Assistant Electrical Inspector and Appellate Authority, of which a recent oral

Facts of the Case The Petitioner (Father cum Husband) filed a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ in the nature of habeas corpus directing the Respondent (Mother cum Wife) to produce his minor child and handover the custody of the said minor to him.

Facts of the Case The Petitioner filed a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying mainly, that the Hon’ble Court admit and allow the petition, and issue writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction in the nature of same and ask the said Respondents