Deeksha Singh

  In the case of Surjit Singh v State of Punjab and Others, Mr. Justice Anupinder Singh Grewal, ordered Addl. Chief Secretary, Department of Home Affairs and Justice, Punjab, to set out all details of FIRs registered against the serving police officers of all rank, by filing an affidavit against whom

  In the case of Paras ram v. Surender Singh and Ors., Mr. Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva allowed the petition, set aside the trial Courts’ impugned order and directed the trial court to issue summons to the respondents and take a view in the matter. Brief facts of the case Order

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has set aside the 24.07.2019 Order of the Trial Court wherein the court did not allow access to crucial documents in the Chief Secretary Assault Case. Brief facts of the case The

In the case of  Arun Kumar v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr., Justice Pratibha M. Singh held that the present petition, along with all pending applications, was disposed of as they are not maintainable, with the liberty to the Petitioner to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT).  

In the case of  Vinay Saini & Ors. v. State (Govt.of NCT Delhi) & Anr., Justice Suresh Kumar Kait quashed the FIR as no useful purpose would have been served in prosecuting petitioners any further.   Brief Facts of the Case Petitioner 1 and Respondent 2 got married on 11th

In the case of R. K. Yadav v. Delhi Development Authority, Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva directed that till a trial court takes up the petitioner’s application into consideration, the interim protection granted to the petitioner shall operate. Accordingly, the petition was disposed of. Brief Facts The Petitioner is the owner of

In the case of Mohd Nashruddin Khan vs Union Of India & Ors, the relief sought by each of the petitioners was to seek quashing of the Writ Petition (CRL). Justice Vipin Sanghi and Justice Rajnish Bhatnagar dismissed these petitions leaving the parties to bear their respective costs. Interim orders

In the case of Great India Trading & other v. Principal Commissioner of Customs ICD Patparganj Delhi & Anr. it was directed by the Hon’ble Chief Justice, Mr Justice Prateek Jalan, that the petitioner shall comply with respondent authority in the investigation and follow three conditions laid on in the

In the case of Neutron Steel Trading v The Commissioner CGST, Central Ex Commissionerate, Delhi west and Ors., Mr Manmohan J. and Mr Sanjeev Narula J. directed the respondent to treat current writ petition as an objection under Rule 159(5) of Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 and decide