Supreme Court Ruling on the Registration of Lease Deed and its Impact Post COVID-19

Must Read

The Right to Information and its Working of 15 years

On 12th October 2020, RTI finished fifteen years since its commencement. The question remains whether the legislation stands up to...

An Insight into Custodial Death in India

“The occurrence of Custodial deaths in the world’s greatest democracy has raised the eyebrows of every citizen and shaken...

Implications in Travel Insurance in Light of the COVID-19 Crisis

As the world, today is crippled by this once in a century pandemic and as of date more than...

Second-Round Effects of Rent Control Laws: The Argentine Case

Introduction In colonial India, a city had an issue with its cobra population, which was a problem clearly in need...

Why Are the Big Techs of Silicon Valley Accused of Anti-Competitive Behaviours?

The big tech giants of the Silicon Valley are facing major challenges with relation to their monopolistic powers after...

KSK announces Sanjay Kumar as a Partner for Pharma & Life Sciences Practice

New Partner for KSK's Pharma & Life Sciences Practice King Stubb & Kasiva recently announced that Mr Sanjay Kumar has...
Chambers of Jain and Kumar Advocates and Consultants
Chambers of Jain and Kumar Advocates and Consultants
Chambers of Jain and Kumar is a full-service law firm located in the heart of national capital. Our primary aim is to provide suitable legal solutions for matters that concern individuals and business establishments. Our aim is to implement customised legal solutions with complete personal attention and provide the finest end-to-end services to meet our clients’ needs. We value the trust our clients place in us and work hard to provide solid and effective representation to meet their diverse legal needs. Our aim is to ensure effective and efficient redressal for our clients in the most prudent and cost-effective way.

Follow us

One most common legal remedy adopted by the tenants during these unprecedented times has been the invocation of the ‘Force Majeure‘ clause, in the lease deeds. However, at this stage, it is to be noted that a non-registered lease deed may have legal consequences for both the landlord and tenant, during COVID-19 times.

The Supreme Court in a recent landmark judgment titled as Siri Chand (deceased) thr. Lrs. v. Surinder Singh,has dealt with an important aspect pertaining to the requirement of compulsory registration of a rent/lease deed for immovable property.

The moot question before the Hon’ble Supreme Court was “Whether the rent/lease deed in the instant case needed to be mandatorily registered as under Section 17(1)(d) of the Registration Act of 1908”.

The Registration Act, 1908,2 requires mandatory registration of a lease deed pertaining to an immovable property let out (i) from year to year; or (ii) for any term exceeding one year; or (iii) reserving a yearly rent. The Supreme Court, after taking note of the provision, had observed that lease of immovable property from year to year, or for any term exceeding one year, or reserving a yearly rent, requires compulsory registration.

The Supreme Court further noted that based on the provisions of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and Rule of Construction, when a rent/lease deed does not provide for a period agreed on between the parties, then in such a scenario, it will be presumed that the lease deed is for a lease of immovable property, on a monthly basis.

Hence, based on the above provisions, the Supreme Court held that when the rent/lease deed does not mention the period of the tenancy or other conditions of the rent/lease deed, in all such cases, it will be assumed that the rent/lease deed is on a monthly basis and the rent/lease deed shall not be compulsorily registrable under the Registration Act, 1908.

The Implication of the Supreme Court’s Decision in Siri Chand

The Siri Chand judgment would bring a ray of hope for landlords during the unfortunate pandemic hour, where they are grappling to recover rents from tenants. The judgment is bound to impact those tenants, who are resorting to legal measures for waiver/suspension of rent as avoidance tactics for paying rent. Further, such tenants may also raise technical grounds against eviction; such as the one dealt by the Supreme Court in the Siri Chand Judgement, regarding, non-registration of rent/lease deed as per the Registration Act, 1908.

Interestingly, the Delhi High Court in a recent plea filed by a tenant for waiver of rent,3 has already ruled that in case the lease deed expressly mentions the Force Majeure clause then in all such cases, the tenant may claim the contract to be void, and resultantly surrender the premises to the Landlord. However, if the tenant wishes to retain the premises and there is no Force Majeure clause in the agreement, the tenant can delay in paying the rent. In light of the lockdown and COVID-19, however, the tenant cannot seek for waiver of rent in such situations.


The Supreme Court in Siri Chand judgement clarified the position of law that in cases where lease agreement does not provide for the duration of the tenancy, it is not required to be registered under the provisions of the Registration Act. Further, in absence of any specification regarding the duration of the tenancy, the presumption may be made that the tenancy was of monthly nature. Similarly, the Delhi High Court in Ramanand case as mentioned above, tried to delve into the legal position of the Force Majeure clause as in rent/lease deeds, helping in resolving few grey areas for both tenants and landlords.

1 Civil Appeal no. 2617 of 2020 decided 20.06.2020.

2 Section 17(1)(d) of the Registration Act 1908.

3 Ramanand and Ors. v. Dr Girish Soni and Anr. decided on 21.05.2020.


Prateek Kumar is a partner at Chambers of Jain and Kumar. The firm is a full-service law firm located in the heart of Delhi with a network of lawyers across the country.

Prateek is an Alumni of Amity Law School, Delhi, Indraprastha University, enrolled with the Bar Council of Delhi in the year 2016. He is a lawyer with expertise in the laws relating to Criminal Law, Arbitration laws, Insurance Laws, Banking laws and Intellectual Property Rights. His area of practice has largely been the Delhi High Court, District Courts of Delhi and various Tribunals, wherein several of his judgements have been reported.

In the past, he has worked in a tier-one Intellectual Property Law Firm and subsequently, with a former Special Public Prosecutor of CBI before the Hon’ble Delhi High Court. He is also a member of Delhi High Court Bar Association.

You can reach him out at [email protected] is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgment from courts. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

US Court Orders Iran To Pay $1.4 BN in Damages To Missing Former FBI Agent’s Family

The United States District Court for the District of Columbia ordered Iran to pay in total $1.45 bn to the Levinson family in punitive...

Onus on Petitioner To Show Unassailable Facts: Delhi High Court

In the case of Rhythm Jain v National Testing Agency, the Delhi High Court mentioned that in such petitions the onus to prove the facts...

Under-Trial/Convicted Persons Do Not Have Absolute Right To Parole in Light of Coronavirus : Bombay High Court

An important judgment was given by the Division Bench of the Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court concerning the constitutionality of Rule 19 of...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Asks State To File Reply To Examine Whether Privacy Rights of an Individual Can Be Violated by Issuing an Executive...

A Writ Petition was instituted by an individual for violation of his fundamental rights by the State before the Madhya Pradesh High Court. The...

Bombay High Court Allows Export of Pending Consignment of Onions in Respect of Which Shipping Bills Have Been Generated Before Notification of the Ban

A writ petition challenging the notification dated 14th September 2020 to ban the export of onions was filed by the Exporters Association before the...

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding that mens rea is an...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @ Balli v State. The bench...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up testing facilities in Delhi.   Facts of...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has set aside the 24.07.2019 Order...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an order restraining the manufacturing, marketing,...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -