Implications in Travel Insurance in Light of the COVID-19 Crisis

Must Read

An Analysis of the Supreme Court’s Guidelines on the Ambit of Maintenance in Matrimonial Cases

The Supreme Court has laid down guidelines in the Rajesh vs. Neha case relating to the ambit of maintenance...

Explained: The OTT Regulations and Their Impact on the Media Future in India

The regulation of content within OTT (Over-the-Top) media and other digital media have fallen under the purview of the...

Frustration of Lease in COVID-19 Times

Introduction The year 2020 has been the most unexpected and the year of most unprecedented events in the history of...

Do All Insults Come Under the Ambit of SC/ST Act as Offence?

Introduction The Honourable Supreme court of India held that all insults or intimidation are not an offence under the Scheduled...

An Analysis of the SC’s Guidelines on the Ambit of Maintenance in Matrimonial Cases

The Supreme Court has laid down guidelines in the Rajesh vs. Neha case relating to the ambit of maintenance...

Madras HC Reaffirms Trial Court’s Decree in Case of Thimmaraya & Ors. V. Gowrammal

A Civil Revision Petition was filed by three petitioners against the dismissal of their application on the file of...
Chambers of Jain and Kumar Advocates and Consultants
Chambers of Jain and Kumar is a full-service law firm located in the heart of national capital. Our primary aim is to provide suitable legal solutions for matters that concern individuals and business establishments. Our aim is to implement customised legal solutions with complete personal attention and provide the finest end-to-end services to meet our clients’ needs. We value the trust our clients place in us and work hard to provide solid and effective representation to meet their diverse legal needs. Our aim is to ensure effective and efficient redressal for our clients in the most prudent and cost-effective way.

Follow us

As the world, today is crippled by this once in a century pandemic and as of date more than 1,53,8221 people have lost their lives worldwide because of the deadly Corona Virus, one major industry that has been worst affected by it is the Travel Industry and shall remain in doldrums for at least another six months.

The debatable legal question that arises on account of the widespread travel restrictions imposed by various countries on their citizens worldwide is “Whether the Insurance Companies would be liable to compensate the insured for the losses suffered on account of the travel restrictions/advisories issued by the governments on their citizens across the globe”.

The most important consideration that arises today is what generally the insurance companies include in their travel policies under the head “TRIP CANCELLATIONS AND INTERRUPTIONS”. On a detailed analysis of this clause in various general travel insurance policies, one would note that generally in pre-corona times the travel Policies would be worded as:

“The place intended to be occupied by the Insured / Insured Person for purposes of Insured / Insured Person’s stay during the trip or the destination being made uninhabitable by fire, flood, vandalism, burglary, or natural disaster”.

On a careful reading of the above clause, our attention would be attracted to two very important words i.e. “uninhabitable” and “natural disaster”. The interpretation of these two words in the travel policies would give rise to numerous litigations in the near future, as the insured consumer will start asserting its insurable claims for the losses suffered against the travel policies issued by the Insurance Companies.

While one aspect out of the two which is “natural disaster” is abundantly settled as a pandemic cannot be construed as a “natural disaster”, however, the other aspect i.e. “uninhabitable” will be more problematic for the Insurance companies as it will surely lead to numerous litigations owing to the wide meaning this particular term can assume if interpreted liberally.

To put things in perspective, let us read the Oxford dictionary meaning of the word “uninhabitable”:

“(of a place) unsuitable for living in.”2

A plain reading of the definition makes it abundantly clear that any country suffering from this deadly virus would be unsuitable for travelling for any purpose be it leisure or business.

Analysis

The above discussion leads to one pertinent legal question i.e. how insurance companies can escape liability for travel insurance claims when the intended place of visit becomes “uninhabitable” on account of the COVID 19 pandemic as declared by the World Health Organization (WHO).3

The insurance companies may raise a defense that the travel losses on account of the COVID-19 crisis are nowhere expressly covered in the travel policies issued by any of them, however, the legal lacuna in that argument is that most of the pre-corona travel insurance policies neither define the term ‘Pandemic’ in exclusion nor expressly include COVID-19 in the exclusion clause.

Conclusion

In all times to come, travel insurance companies may including the term “COVID 19 pandemic” in the exclusion clause in future travel policies. However, it may be interesting to note how travel insurance companies would escape the liability for the policies that are already issued by them during the pre-COVID-19 times, and the future claims arising thereof.

References

1 https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/

2 https://languages.oup.com/dictionaries/#oed

3 https://www.who.int/ar


Prateek Kumar is a partner at Chambers of Jain and Kumar. The firm is a full-service law firm located in the heart of Delhi with a network of lawyers across the country.

Prateek Kumar is a partner at Chambers of Jain and Kumar. The firm is a full-service law firm located in the heart of Delhi with a network of lawyers across the country.

Prateek is an Alumni of Amity Law School, Delhi, Indraprastha University, enrolled with the Bar Council of Delhi in the year 2016. He is a lawyer with expertise in the laws relating to Criminal Law, Arbitration laws, Insurance Laws, Banking laws and Intellectual Property Rights. His area of practice has largely been the Delhi High Court, District Courts of Delhi and various Tribunals, wherein several of his judgements have been reported.

In the past, he has worked in a tier-one Intellectual Property Law firm and subsequently with a former Special Public Prosecutor of CBI before the Hon’ble Delhi High Court. He is also a member of Delhi High Court Bar Association.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgment from courts. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Supreme Court Affirms Decision Passed by the High Court in the Case of Jayantilal Verma V. State of M.P. (Now Chhattisgarh)

The appellant filed this appeal before the Supreme Court against the judgment passed by the High Court, convicting the appellant herein for the offences...

Telangana High Court Pulls up State Government Over COVID Test Numbers

Telangana High Court on 19.11.2020, warned the State Government to be wary of the second wave of COVID-19 and directed it to step up...

Supreme Court Modifies Judgment of Kerala High Court, Reduces the Sentence and Compensation of the Appellants

The criminal appeal was filed by the accused, aggrieved by the judgment of conviction and sentence also the judgment in a criminal appeal, passed...

Madras HC Reaffirms Trial Court’s Decree in Case of Thimmaraya & Ors. V. Gowrammal

A Civil Revision Petition was filed by three petitioners against the dismissal of their application on the file of the Sub-Judge, Hosur. The case...

Delhi High Court Disposes Ashok Arora’s Appeal Against Suspension From Supreme Court Bar Association

In the present Petition, Senior Advocate Ashok Arora challenged an Order passed by a Single Judge bench. The Order held that Mr Arora had...

Allahabad High Court Dismisses Application To Quash Prima Facie Allegations of Criminal Intimidation and Outraging Modesty

Allahabad High Court, on 17th November 2020, dismissed an application filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. and refused to quash the charge sheet (dated...

Delhi High Court Prohibits Gathering in Public Places To Celebrate Chhat Puja

The Order had come in a Writ Petition moved by Shri Durga Jan Seva Trust. The Petition sought to quash and set aside an...

Bombay High Court Directs State To Pass Tribe Claim Within Two Weeks, Refuses To Intervene on Merits of Claim Itself

The Division Bench of Bombay High Court consisting of Justice S.S. Shinde and Madhav Jayajirao Jamdar passed an order on 17th November 2020 in...

Kerala High Court Dismisses Petition by Allocating Respondent To Vacancy in IFS Cadre

On 16th November 2020, the Division Bench at Kerala High Court, consisting of Honourable Justice A.M. Shaffique and Honourable Justice Gopinath. P heard the...

AP High Court: If an Auction Is Conducted by a Cooperative Bank, the Property Ceases to be Property of the State

A single-judge bench consisting of honourable justice Ninala Jayasurya gave orders on the writ petition filed by the petitioner. The petition challenges the action...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -