Should India Consider Increasing the Legal Age of Marriage for Women?

Must Read

The Right to Information and its Working of 15 years

On 12th October 2020, RTI finished fifteen years since its commencement. The question remains whether the legislation stands up to...

An Insight into Custodial Death in India

“The occurrence of Custodial deaths in the world’s greatest democracy has raised the eyebrows of every citizen and shaken...

Implications in Travel Insurance in Light of the COVID-19 Crisis

As the world, today is crippled by this once in a century pandemic and as of date more than...

Second-Round Effects of Rent Control Laws: The Argentine Case

Introduction In colonial India, a city had an issue with its cobra population, which was a problem clearly in need...

Why Are the Big Techs of Silicon Valley Accused of Anti-Competitive Behaviours?

The big tech giants of the Silicon Valley are facing major challenges with relation to their monopolistic powers after...

KSK announces Sanjay Kumar as a Partner for Pharma & Life Sciences Practice

New Partner for KSK's Pharma & Life Sciences Practice King Stubb & Kasiva recently announced that Mr Sanjay Kumar has...

Follow us

The Honourable Prime Minister of India has recently stated that the government is reconsidering the legal marriage age for women. Currently, the legal marriage age for women stands at 18 years. 

Reasoning Behind This Consideration

The government of India is reconsidering the marriage age for girls to increase it from 18 to 21 years. It believes that this change will have significant outcomes, including, empowered girls and women, increased literacy rate, improved infant mortality rate (IMR) and Maternal Mortality Ratio (MMR). According to data released by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare and the Sample Registration system of the Registrar General of India, the country’s Maternal mortality rate declined to 113 in 2016-18 from 122 in 2015-16 and 130 in 2014-2016. Furthermore, increasing the minimum age will have a lot of advantages to society. If the minimum age for marriage increased, the population could be controlled; women/females would not be considered a burden, the rate of literacy would improve, the workforce ratio (females) would improve.

According to a report, in the last five years, 3.76 crore marriages have taken place in India. Among these, 3.76 crores, 1.37 crore girls were married at the age of 18-19 years while 75 lakh girls were married at the age of 20-21 years.

According to a report by UNICEF, 27% of girls in India are married at the age of 18. In comparison, 7% of girls get married at less than 15 years of age, having a direct impact on maternal capacity, mortality during childbirth and the population. 

Every 20 minutes, a mother is dying of childbirth and pregnancy in India, and India has the highest Maternal Mortality Rate, said a report

The above-mentioned data shows that our country needs to regulate a proper norm on marriage age for girls. So, by increasing the legal marriage age, the child can be protected from social pressure and help prevent trafficking. And the change in legal marriage age will bring gender parity in the age of marriage since the present marriage age for men is 21.

Comparing India’s Stance With Other Countries

The minimum age of marriage for girls is determined on the basis of 3 parts. 1) wedding with judicial permission, 2) wedding with parental permission and 3) wedding without parental or judicial permission.

In some countries, the minimum age for marriage has not been determined by law: example, Saudi Arabia and Yemen. The minimum marriage age for girls in Lebanon is nine years, in Iran, it is 13 years, in Kuwait, it is 15 years, in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Qatar and Britain it is 16 years. And in countries like North Korea, Syria, Uzbekistan, the minimum age for marriage is 17 years. 

In India, America, France, Germany, Canada, Australia, Russia, Brazil and Sri Lanka, the minimum marriage age (girls) is 18. In Algeria and South Korea, the minimum marriage age of girls is 19 years while in Japan, China, Nepal, Thailand, the minimum marriage age of girls is 20 years. In countries like Indonesia, Nigeria, Malaysia and the Philippines, it is 21 years.

So, each country has set its own legal marriage age. The only remedy to keep control of the increase in population is by increasing the legal marriage age. It will address gender equality related issues, and all make our country free from socio-economic problems.

Is This Change Bound to Create Confusion?

Until last year, the government of India tried to reduce the marriage age of boys from 21 to 18 years. But recently it had stated that a committee is formed to analyse the advantages and effects if the marriage age of girls is increased. From the government side, the main purpose of increasing the marriage age is to reduce the population level in our country.

However, the officials stated that the idea was “being met with apprehension for several reasons within the health ministry.” Girls do become sexually active before the age of 21. If the government increases the age for marriage, then several of them will not avail the formal healthcare system for their reproductive or sexual rights.

As per reports, if the marriage age increased, there is a probability of an increase in child marriage. As per law, child marriage is illegal whereas not void, so if the marriage age is increased, then it would create “deeper discrepancy” in the law. The Honourable Supreme court, in its judgement, held that sex with a minor wife is considered as rape. Hence, marriage with a child is voidable, but having sexual intercourse is illegal. 

As per reports, if the legal age of marriage got increased then there is a high chance of parental control and girls will continue to be pushed into early marriage due to poverty, customary practises, etc. And also confusion arises about the condition of women and girls married under 21 years of age. 

In India, Child marriage is not void, but having sex with her is illegal. As per law, the parties to the marriage need to approach the court to get their marriage nullified. This creates a lot of confusion. So, the only remedy to this issue is by making child marriage as void (Void ab initio).

Conclusion

Eighteen years of age is considered as the universal age of adulthood. A person acquires voting rights, becomes competent to make a contract, acquires the right to own a business, but when it comes to marriage, it lags. As stated above, the increase in legal marriage for girls has many advantages, and as the objective of this change has good impacts, the difference is a welcoming one. 


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgment from courts. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Punjab Woman Evokes Petition for Protection Fearing Honour Killing

In the case of Divya Mattu and another vs State of Punjab and others, the petitioner, Divya, fearing honour killing against her by her...

Punjab Woman Accuses Punjab Police of Keeping Husband in Illegal Custody and Framing Him in a False Case

In the case of Geeta v the State of Punjab, the petitioner evoked a writ petition of habeas corpus as she claimed that her...

Addition of Words as Prefixes or Suffixes Is an Infringement of a Registered Trademark: Delhi High Court

Justice Jayanth Nath allowed the Times Group to use its registered trademark “Newshour”, in the case of Bennett Coleman and Co. Ltd v. ARG Outlier...

Just Because the Deceased Did Not Have License, Does Not Imply He Was Negligent: Chhattisgarh High Court

In the case of Hemlal & Others v. Dayaram & Others, a Single Bench of Chhattisgarh High Court consisting of Justice Sanjay S. Agrawal annunciated various...

Hoardings Are Movable Property Under Section 2(3) of DMC Act Subject To the Twin Test: Delhi High Court

Delhi High Court in the case of Delhi International Airport v South Delhi Metropolitan Corporation discussed in detail the provision under Section 2(3) of the DMC...

State Cannot Issue Directions on Rate of Charge of Non-COVID Patients in Private Hospitals: Bombay High Court

On 23rd October 2020, the Nagpur Bench of Bombay High court at Nagpur, consisting of Justice R.K. Deshpande and Justice Pushpa V. Ganediwala gave...

UAPA Cannot Be Used When the Accused Does Not Have an Active Knowledge of the Offence: Delhi High Court

Justice Suresh Kumar Kait held that the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act cannot be charged on the accused when he does not have any knowledge...

US Court Orders Iran To Pay $1.4 BN in Damages To Missing Former FBI Agent’s Family

The United States District Court for the District of Columbia ordered Iran to pay in total $1.45 bn to the Levinson family in punitive...

Onus on Petitioner To Show Unassailable Facts: Delhi High Court

In the case of Rhythm Jain v National Testing Agency, the Delhi High Court mentioned that in such petitions the onus to prove the facts...

Under-Trial/Convicted Persons Do Not Have Absolute Right To Parole in Light of Coronavirus : Bombay High Court

An important judgment was given by the Division Bench of the Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court concerning the constitutionality of Rule 19 of...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -