Increase of Poll Expenditure Ceiling by the Indian Government

Must Read

Targeting the Supreme Court Judges

A letter was written by Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister to the Chief Justice of India on October 6 targeting one...

An Illummination of the Home Ministry’s Commission for Revision of Penal Laws

The Indian Penal Code was enacted in 1860. It was formed after the draft was created by the first...

Political Parties and the Affair of Symbols

Introduction A political party is a group of people with the same ideology, intention, and agenda who try to hold power through...

Withdrawal of Judges in light of the Principle of “Nemo Judex In Causa Sua”: An Analysis

"Justice, and the arrival of that justice being delivered, is essential to the protection of the guideline of thumb of law. Justice implies - consistency, in technique and result...

Explained: The Scope of Article 21 During the Era of COVID-19

“One’s right to self, their body, their health, and their livelihoods is inherent to living a meaningful human life, Human...

Explained: Events That Led To the 2020 Rajasthan Political Crisis

The government has been toppled in the state of Rajasthan, following which petitions have been filed in the High...

Follow us

The law ministry has increased the ceiling on poll expenditure by 10% for Lok Sabha and Assembly elections following a recommendation by the ECI.

The proposal by ECI

Over a month, the law ministry sources said they had received a proposal from the Election Commission of India (ECI) regarding an amendment to the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961. In which the ECI had proposed to amend Rule- 90 of the said statute to increase the campaign expenditure limit by 10% for all future elections due to restrictions imposed to control the spread of coronavirus.

According to government sources, the ECI has argued that campaign activities during a pandemic will be a challenging one. By following imposed restrictions, conducting election campaigns will lead to hikes in spending.

The proposal came after feedback was submitted by the BJP and other political parties to the poll panel. In which they suggested increasing the expenditure limit to accommodate spending on PPEs, thermal screening, and other measures. They also added that such expenditure should be added to the party’s account and not the candidates.

The ECI, after receiving this suggestion, formed a committee of officers on this subject. And after analysing, recommended a 10% increase in the expenditure limit for candidates contesting Lok Sabha and Assembly elections. Which then was approved by the Government of India. The Ministry of law and Justice notified us of the amendment on 19th October 2020.

Amendment of Rule 90 of the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961

The said amendment will help the candidates contesting the Bihar poll as well as the polls to 1 Lok Sabha and 59 Assembly seats.

The election commission indicated that this hike in expenditure is due to Covid-19. And also mentioned that this amendment would stand effective during the pandemic. But, in the official gazette, this specific condition was not included, whereas it said, “until further notification” this amendment to Rule- 90 of the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961 will be in effect.

As per reports, this increase in expenditure limits applies to expenditure towards the use of vehicles in campaigns, on campaigning equipment, at election rallies, in electronic and print media, on banners, pamphlets, and field visits. The biggest expenditure areas are social media platforms and publicity.

The ECI has instructed political parties to submit their social media accounts and their total spending for advertising, campaigns, and wages paid to a team of workers related to account maintenance.

It is also instructed that political parties should provide details of expenditure incurred during the campaign within 30 days of the declaration of election results. If a political party fails to do so, it will amount to a violation of Rule 90 of the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961. And corruption practices under Section- 123 (6) Representation of Peoples Act, 1951.

New ceiling and poll expenditure

As per the official gazette, the ceiling on poll expenditure varies from state to state. Candidates in Assembly elections in bigger states like Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, and Tamil Nadu are allowed to spend Rs. 30.8 lakhs. Before the said amendment, the limit was set on Rs. 28 lakhs.

And people contesting Lok Sabha’s election in these states are now allowed to spend up to Rs. 77 lakhs. Earlier, it was Rs. 70 lakhs. Goa, Arunachal Pradesh, Sikkim, and a few UTs have a lower ceiling when compared to the above-mentioned states. It is for Rs. 59.4 lakhs for Lok Sabha and Rs. 22 lakhs for contesting Assembly election.

What doesn’t account for election expenditure?

The amounts spent on travel by or any other means for propagating the program of the political party do not come under the ambit of election expenditure.

Any amount spent on the service of the government and discharge of official duty is also not considered to be election expenditure.

How are such ceilings made?

Ceilings are made by amending the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961. The last time it was amended in 2014 just ahead of the Lok Sabha polls. For Andhra Pradesh and Telangana, the limit was enhanced in 2018.

Committee to review candidates’ expenditures

The ECI has formed a committee to examine the issue of revising the expenditure limit in view of the increase in the number of electors and an increase in the Cost Inflation Index. It consists of former DG investigations Harish Kumar and EC secretary General Umesh Sinha. As said earlier, the last time the amendment was made before six years wherein the electorate and cost inflation index has increased.

The committee will examine the expenditures of all political parties and will submit its report within four months of its constitution, the EC said. is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgment from courts. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Madras HC Reaffirms Trial Court’s Decree in Case of Thimmaraya & Ors. V. Gowrammal

A Civil Revision Petition was filed by three petitioners against the dismissal of their application on the file of the Sub-Judge, Hosur. The case...

Delhi High Court Disposes Ashok Arora’s Appeal Against Suspension From Supreme Court Bar Association

In the present Petition, Senior Advocate Ashok Arora challenged an Order passed by a Single Judge bench. The Order held that Mr Arora had...

Allahabad High Court Dismisses Application To Quash Prima Facie Allegations of Criminal Intimidation and Outraging Modesty

Allahabad High Court, on 17th November 2020, dismissed an application filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. and refused to quash the charge sheet (dated...

Delhi High Court Prohibits Gathering in Public Places To Celebrate Chhat Puja

The Order had come in a Writ Petition moved by Shri Durga Jan Seva Trust. The Petition sought to quash and set aside an...

Bombay High Court Directs State To Pass Tribe Claim Within Two Weeks, Refuses To Intervene on Merits of Claim Itself

The Division Bench of Bombay High Court consisting of Justice S.S. Shinde and Madhav Jayajirao Jamdar passed an order on 17th November 2020 in...

Kerala High Court Dismisses Petition by Allocating Respondent To Vacancy in IFS Cadre

On 16th November 2020, the Division Bench at Kerala High Court, consisting of Honourable Justice A.M. Shaffique and Honourable Justice Gopinath. P heard the...

AP High Court: If an Auction Is Conducted by a Cooperative Bank, the Property Ceases to be Property of the State

A single-judge bench consisting of honourable justice Ninala Jayasurya gave orders on the writ petition filed by the petitioner. The petition challenges the action...

Madras HC Rules in Favour of the Authorities in FMGE Examination, Finds Writ Petitions Against the Exam Void of Merit

Three aspirants of Foreign Medical Examinations moved to the High Court by filing a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution. They...

Hong Kong High Court Rules for Independent Mechanisms To Be Set up To Deal With Complaints Against Police Officers

The present suit was brought by a journalist association because of the police brutality that the protestors faced in the protests against the China...

Madras High Court Maintains That Government Policy Is To Prioritize Own State’s Candidates and Sets Aside Nativity Certificate Rejection Order

Varsha Totagi, a NEET aspirant filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution. She had been denied Nativity Certificate without which...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -