Should CCTV’s be Installed in the Police Station?

Must Read

Should the Exorbitant Amounts Charged for RT-PCR Tests be Refunded?

Introduction A plea has been filed in the Honourable Supreme Court of India seeking a refund of exorbitant amounts charged...

A Legal Analysis of the West Bengal Political Crisis on IPS Deputation

The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has recently summoned three IPS officers of West Bengal (WB). The decision was...

Explained: Postal Ballot for NRIs

At the end of November 2020, Election Commission sent a proposal to the law ministry to amend the Representation...

Explained: Constitutional Provisions and Legislations With Regards to a Person with Disabilities

The world celebrates December 3 as International Day of Persons with Disabilities (IDPD). This day is also called World...

“Pro-Enforcement Bias” Towards Foreign Arbitral Awards Domestically, in light of Vijay Karia and Ors. V. Prysmian Cavi E Sistemi S.R.L and Ors.

International Arbitration faces challenges domestically due to unharmonized local laws for enforcement. Often it may occur that an award...

Hiring During the Pandemic – Lessons to be Learnt, Strategies to be Developed

The year 2020 has been incredibly challenging in every sense of the word with the pandemic. Many companies were...

Follow us


In a recent judgment, the bench led by Justice Nariman issued directions to both the state and Union Territory governments to install CCTV cameras in every functioning police station. The apex court while hearing a related to custodial torture, issued this direction to uphold the human rights of all individuals. 

Rise of Custodial Death & Torture

The issue of custodial death and torture is not a new challenge in India. But in recent times, the registration of custodial death cases are increasing, due to which this issue seems to be a recent challenge for many. Custodial death is one of the worst crimes in a civilized society, that too in a democratic state. Universally, it is held as one of the cruellest forms of human rights abuse. Even though the constitution of India protects the rights and liberties of its citizens and also restricts unlawful arrest and detention. Due to the present power and authority, some police officers are destroying the lives of many. Not all officials violate the law, but some uncivilized personnel abuse their power to torture, someone.

A recent report by a rights body against custodial torture across the world reveals a disturbing scenario in India. As per reports, 1,731 people died in custody in 2019, where most of them belonging to vulnerable communities such as Dalit and Muslim. In this total of 1,731, 125 people died in police custody, and the rest in judicial custody. The issue of brutality and custodial death is not only India’s challenge, it is a global concern. The recent death of George Floyd at the hands of the police in the US has created a huge impact on the lives of minorities and their rights.

Even though people give their support against tortures and brutality, the judicial proceedings and inquiries against the person responsible are still in a grey area. The crimes in India reports also do not specify how the cause of death was ascribed and even though if any order was pronounced to conduct enquiries, whether it was followed is also a question. Until the year 2005, Section- 176 of the Code of Criminal Procedure required an executive magistrate to conduct an inquiry when any unnatural death had happened in custody. But after the amendment to the said section, it was mandated to make a judicial or metropolitan magistrate inquiry in addition to a police inquiry. But still, when it comes to implementation, it lags due to many reasons. 

The death of the duo (Father and Son) in Tamil Nadu has sparked anger across India and caused people to raise their voices against custodial deaths. The issue of custodial deaths in India is still an uncontrolled one. Even though the number of deaths has been rising, the number of reporting cases is still low. This is not because of inadequate knowledge about their rights and law, but due to fear of life. The voices of victims and their families are suppressed by many evil-minded persons who possess authority and power. 

Shafi Mohammed v. State of Himachal Pradesh

The court observed that videography is crucial and credible evidence. It is admissible in court as evidence. The court issued directions to the government to install CCTV cameras to capture videos of the investigation, particularly for crime scenes. It is also directed to introduce the first phase of implementation of crime scene videography by 15th July 2018.

CCTV in All Police Stations, CBI, NIA, NCB, ED

As the number of custodial deaths is increasing nowadays. The Honourable Supreme Court directed all state and UT governments to install CCTV cameras in all police stations. Besides, it is also directed to install CCTV cameras and recording equipment in the offices of central agencies such as CBI, ED, NCB, NIA, etc…

The court pointed out specific places where CCTV cameras be installed such as all entry and exit points, the main gate of the police station, all lock-ups, all corridors, lobby, all verandas, inspector and sub-inspectors room, areas outside the lock-up room, back part of the police station, etc…Literally, except the washroom, all other places in police stations must be under surveillance.

All CCTV cameras must be equipped with night mode and must necessarily consist of audio and video. Where such footage must be stored for 18 months, the SHO of the police station is responsible for the same. In case, if any police station is situated in a place where no internet or electricity exists, the state or UT must provide adequate equipment and the necessity for proper installation and storage said the top court

State & District Level Oversight Committee

The apex court ordered the establishment of an oversight committee at state and district levels. The role of this committee is to administer surveillance and solve issues related to the same. The DG/ IG of each state and Union Territory were directed to issue guidelines to the person in charge of the police station to entrust the SHO. SHO has a role in monitoring the camera footage and has the responsibility to check the working condition of the CCTV cameras. SHO is also responsible for data maintenance, backup of data, fault rectification, etc… The court was directed to establish Human Rights courts in each district. Under Section- 30 of the Protection of Human Rights Act, the said court would be established. Cases related to misuse of power, police brutality, custodial death, and other related abuses will be heard in this court. All persons have the right to approach the state Human Rights Commission and Human Rights court when any force is exerted by police while in custody.

Measures such as the said directions and establishment of courts won’t alone stop this serious offense. Proper soft skills and importance of the authority and duties must be taught to those officers who misuse their power. As said earlier, some courts have jurisdiction to take cases related to custodial death and tortures, but when it comes to reality, the case is different. Many cases are unheard and even if any judicial proceedings were prosecuted, the conviction percentage is very low.

Over the past decade, 1,004 deaths were reported due to custodial death. Wherein 297 judicial inquiries were ordered, as were 402 inquiries by an executive magistrate. It is still unclear whether each inquiry pertained to a single death, and whether some of these inquiries were into the same deaths. 

This clearly shows the lack of accountability in the system when it comes to custodial deaths.


To stop the misuse of power by police and to protect the human rights of individuals. The apex court directed all governments of the state and UT to install CCTV cameras at all police stations and offices of central agencies. The court also directed the centre to file an affidavit on the constitution and workings of the central oversight body. 

The only solution to this issue of custodial death and police brutality is to make investigation transparent and make concerned authorities accountable. As the number of conviction and judicial proceedings against persons responsible for custodial death are low, makes other unethical officials misuse their power. So, implementation of law must be done in the first place and that must be stringent law. is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgment from courts. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders Security To BJP Leader Alleged for Not Supporting Farmers Protest

The Order had come in the form of a Writ Petition filed by Tikshan Sood under Article 226 of the Constitution. The petition before...

Lahore High Court Outlaws Two-Finger Virginity Test

The Lahore High Court in Pakistan has outlawed the use and conduct of virginity tests, namely, the use of the “two-finger” virginity test and...

London Court Rejects Assange’s Extradition – What Happens Now? 

Earlier last week, District Judge Vanessa Baraitser, sitting in the Westminster Magistrates’ Court denied the Government of the U.S.A.'s request to the U.K. to...

Calcutta High Court Decides in Favor of Contractor as He Accidentally Pays an Excessively High Amount

Introduction The present writ petition has been filed for a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondents to revoke the Petitioner’s offer as...

Petition Filed in Delhi High Court Challenging the New Privacy Policy of WhatsApp

A petition has been raised before the Delhi High Court challenging the updated privacy policy of the instant messaging app, WhatsApp. It is accused of looking into the virtual activities of the users,

Bombay High Court Says Pleas Against the Rejection of Nomination Before the Polls Is Not Maintainable

Bombay High Court on Wednesday held that a candidate cannot challenge his nomination by filing a writ petition before a court prior to the polls after his nominations have already been rejected by the Returning Officer (RO) for the Panchayat elections of January 15.

Bombay HC: It Will Be Difficult if Civic Bodies Don’t Take Action on Illegal Constructions

The Bombay High Court said on Wednesday that if the Municipal Corporations do not take action on the illegal constructions, things will become very difficult. This observation was made by a bench comprising Chief Justice Dipankar Dutta and Justice Girish Kulkarni while hearing a PIL after the Bhiwandi building collapse on September 21st, 2020 which led to the death of 39 lives. Mumbai Thane, Ulhasnagar, Kalyan-Dombivli, Vasai-Virar, Navi Mumbai, and Bhiwandi-Nizampur corporations were filed as respondents.

Uttarakhand High Court Directed State Authorities To Frame SOP Regarding Kumbh Mela 2021

Noticing the commencement date of Kumbh Mela 2021 amid pandemic from 27 February 2021, the Uttarakhand High Court on Monday expressed concern with regard to organizing and conducting of the Mela and directed State Authorities to discuss and resolve the logistical problems which can come in organizing the Mela during the pandemic time.

Writ Petition Not Maintainable Against Mahindra Finance, Being a Purely Private Body: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court reiterated that Writ Petition against the purely private body is not maintainable and dismissed the petition which was filed against Mahindra Finance Bank as Arif Khan v. Branch Manager Mahindra Finance Sultanpur & Another.

Publication of Notices for Inter-Faith Marriages No Longer Mandatory: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court has passed a landmark judgment that likely brings relief to inter-faith marriage. The Court on Wednesday said that the mandatory publication of Notices of Inter-Faith marriages will now be optional to protect the Privacy and Liberty of the Couple. The Court observed that the publication of the notice would “invade the fundamental rights of liberty and privacy”. Therefore, it has made it optional for the couple, they can now request in form of writing to a marriage officer to publish or not to publish a notice regarding the marriage.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -