Political Prisoners and COVID‘s Double-Edged Sword for Those Awaiting Trial

Must Read

An Analysis of the Supreme Court of India’s Decision in Saurav Yadav v. State of Uttar Pradesh on Reservation

Reservation is one of the debatable realities of Indian constitution. This system got its roots from the exploitations due...

Explained: The Political Crisis in Nepal

On December 20th, K P Sharma Oli, the Prime Minister of Nepal dissolved the Lower House Parliament of the...

Can the Relatives of the Husband Attract Prosecution in Case of Triple Talaq?

The Supreme Court of India has recently made a judgement. It lays down that the relatives of the husband...

Explained: The Right to be Forgotten in India

Right to Privacy is an essential fundamental right which has been enshrined in the Indian Constitution under Article 21...

How will the New WhatsApp Privacy Policy Affect Us?

On January 4, 2020, the California based tech giant WhatsApp announced its new privacy law. It allows data integration...

India’s International ‘Retrospective Taxation’ Regime Vis-a-Vis PCA Rulings in Vodafone and Cairn in 2020

The imposition of retrospective taxation of foreign companies doing business in India has been at the helm of controversy...

Follow us

The COVID pandemic has delayed judicial proceedings on one end. On the other end, it poses serious health risks for those kept in overcrowded jails. Thereby, the pandemic has become a double-edged sword for those awaiting trials.

Bail as the rule 

The general principle of law is that bail is the norm and jail is the exception. However, the Courts have rejected numerous bail petitions. Another common phenomenon, especially in the pandemic times, has been that of the bail pleadings being postponed.

Recent Cases 

A prime example of this phenomenon is the case of doctor Kafeel Khan. The Allahabad High Court on 27th July 2020 deferred a hearing for Kafeel Khan for the 12th time in five months. Khan had been in Mathura jail since 29th January 2020. He was arrested for a speech he delivered at Uttar Pradesh’s Aligarh Muslim University. The Court granted him bail on 10th February, but he was not allowed to leave. On 13th February, the UP government levelled the National Security Act,1980 against him. Khan had earlier in 2018 spent several months in jail about an oxygen shortage crisis. He was later absolved of all charges through a government report.

Another critical case is that of Varavar Rao, where health concerns arose due to the pandemic. The 79-year-old Telugu poet was arrested over his alleged involvement in the Bhima Koregaon case. Rao had filed for an interim bail citing his frail health and susceptibility to COVID-19 in March. However, a special NIA Court rejected the plea, and the Court rejected it again for the second time in June. Rao tested positive for COVID-19 on 16th July.

Anti CAA protestors 

The pandemic has seen an alarming rise in arrests of political prisoners. The United Nations (UN) in June urged India to release anti CAA activists.

A statement released by the UN experts read, “Authorities should immediately release all human rights defenders who are currently being held in pre-trial detention without sufficient evidence, based on speeches they made criticising the discriminatory nature of the CAA.”

The statement mentions explicitly 11 individuals, including Meeran Haider, Gulfisha Fatima, Safoora Zargar, Asif Iqbal Tanha, Devangana Kalita, Natasha Narwal, Khalid Saifi, Shifa Ur Rehman, Dr Kafeel Khan, Sharjeel Imam and Akhil Gogoi. Prisoners like Akhil Gogoi and Sharjeel Imam are still in jail despite testing positive for the coronavirus.

The NIA on 28th July arrested Hany Babu, an Associate Professor of Delhi University. The arrest was in connection with the Elgar Parishad case in Mumbai.

Eleven other accused – Sudha Bharadwaj, Shoma Sen, Surendra Gadling, Mahesh Raut, Arun Ferreira, Sudhir Dhawale, Rona Wilson, Vernon Gonsalves, Varavara Rao, Anand Teltumbde and Gautam Navlakha were arrested earlier in the same case, and all are in jail now. The NIA took over the case from the Maharashtra Police in January 2020.

Remedies for undertrials

The Indian law provides for various protections for undertrials. Maneka Gandhi v Union of India established that access to speedy justice is a fundamental right. Hussainara Khatoon v. State of Bihar states that the State has the responsibility of establishing a process that ensures speedy justice. It said that financial constraints to set up infrastructure cannot be an excuse.

The Supreme Court in March observed that social distancing was difficult in prisons. There were 1339 prisons with approximately 4,66,084 inmates. The Court stated that the National Crime Records Bureau showed the occupancy rate of Indian prisons at 117.6%. As per NCRB data, more than half of prisoners in India are undertrials.

The Supreme Court asked the State Governments to consider giving parole to those facing up to seven-year jail term. This was an attempt at decongesting prisons on account of the COVID-19 outbreak. This makes the nature of crimes that prisoners are accused of, the primary factor for determining bail. Thereby, it provides no relief to political prisoners who are accused of grave crimes based on little to no evidence.

Impact of UAPA and NSA

Arrests of Anti CAA protestors and about the Bhima Koregaon case were under serious allegations. These arrests under the UAPA and NSA strip individuals of their usual defences against judicial delays. Law experts state that most of these arrests are based on flimsy evidence. Historical data shows that the conviction rates under these statues are very low. At the end of 2018, of the 2,008 cases under UAPA, only 317 were sent to trial. The draconian nature of these statutes allows them to be used as a tool to curb dissent.

Role of Courts

The statutes under which political prisoners are arrested leave them upto the mercy of courts. It must see that the leeway provided to the executive is not excessively applied. The bail application cannot depend merely on the nature of crimes they are accused of. The Courts need to take note of health factors and the evidence against a person. Furthermore, the Courts must recognise their duty in protecting the liberty of these citizens.

Granting bail is an essential remedy for undertrials. The Courts need to observe every bail application on its merits. It is upto the Courts to ensure that arrests under UAPA and NSA are not merely used as a means to threaten those opposing the government. The Courts must also treat bail applications on a priority basis. Every deferred hearing costs an individual more weeks or even months of being deprived of freedom.

Conclusion 

The Courts should not allow the pandemic to be misused as a tool by the government or the accused. A balance between social order and an individual’s rights must be struck. Bail applications need to be viewed with careful consideration to ensure justice. Judicial delays must not cost a person his or her right to freedom.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

High Court of Gauhati Hears PIL for Non-Implementation of Funds for Various Schemes in Nagaland

Introduction A PIL filed by the Global Trust Club raising the issue concerned with the non-implementation of schemes such as Swachh Bharat Mission in Nagaland...

Public Money Recovery Cannot Wait in Perpetuity To Suit Convenience of Particular Borrower: Calcutta High Court

Excerpt The Bench of Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of the Calcutta High Court on 22nd January 2021, ruled that the recovery of public money cannot wait...

Supreme Court Refuses To Provide Protection From Arrest To ‘Tandav’ Team

The Supreme Court did not give any relief to actors and the makers of Tandav, an Amazon Prime Video Web Series who appealed for protection against their arrest. At least three cases have been filed in Uttar Pradesh against the makers of the series for the inappropriate depiction of the UP police, deities, and adverse portrayal of the character of PM. States like Maharashtra, Karnataka, Bihar, Delhi, and Chandigarh also have similar cases filed.

Transferring Employee Without Justification To Another Place Where Post Does Not Exist Is Illegal and Arbitrary; Should Be Set Aside: Andhra Pradesh High Court

Excerpt A single-judge Bench consisting of Honorable Justice M. Satyanarayana Murthy gave orders on the writ petition filed by the Petitioner seeking to issue a...

Supreme Court Extends Protection To CM Yediyurappa Against Arrest in a Corruption Case

The Supreme Court on Monday protected the Chief Minister of Karnataka and the former minister of industries Murugesh Nirani from the arrest pertaining to a case of alleged forgery over the withdrawal of approval given to a piece of land.

Centre’s Resistance To Draft EIA in All Vernacular Languages Questioned by the Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court said that it cannot understand why the Centre is refusing from translating the Environment Impact Act (EIA) into all 22 vernacular languages mentioned in the eighth schedule of the Constitution.

Section 125 of CrPC Was Enacted To Achieve Social Justice for Women, Child and Infirm Parents: Allahabad HC

The Allahabad High Court, while terming the statutory mandate for a financially capable man to maintain his wife, children and parents, a social legislature, it said that the proceeding under it is of a summary nature and is aimed at providing quick relief to the person in dire need.

Federal Court Rules That 1992 Term Limit Amendments To Michigan Constitution Were Lawful

Excerpt The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan last Wednesday ruled in favour of the Offices of the Secretary of State for...

Maryland’s County Circuit Court Sentences Sean Urbanski To Life in Prison for Murder of 2Lt. Richard Collins III

Excerpt On the 14th of January 2021, Prince George’s County Circuit Court in Maryland (US) sentenced Sean C. Urbanski to life in prison with the...

“Dismissal Without Inquiry Is Justified if Employee Did Not Prove Minimum Working Period”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the dispute relating to the termination of an employee without any disciplinary inquiry. Brief facts of the case The Respondent, Smt. Sureshwati was...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -