Political Prisoners and COVID‘s Double-Edged Sword for Those Awaiting Trial

Must Read

The Right to Information and its Working of 15 years

On 12th October 2020, RTI finished fifteen years since its commencement. The question remains whether the legislation stands up to...

An Insight into Custodial Death in India

“The occurrence of Custodial deaths in the world’s greatest democracy has raised the eyebrows of every citizen and shaken...

Implications in Travel Insurance in Light of the COVID-19 Crisis

As the world, today is crippled by this once in a century pandemic and as of date more than...

Second-Round Effects of Rent Control Laws: The Argentine Case

Introduction In colonial India, a city had an issue with its cobra population, which was a problem clearly in need...

Why Are the Big Techs of Silicon Valley Accused of Anti-Competitive Behaviours?

The big tech giants of the Silicon Valley are facing major challenges with relation to their monopolistic powers after...

KSK announces Sanjay Kumar as a Partner for Pharma & Life Sciences Practice

New Partner for KSK's Pharma & Life Sciences Practice King Stubb & Kasiva recently announced that Mr Sanjay Kumar has...

Follow us

The COVID pandemic has delayed judicial proceedings on one end. On the other end, it poses serious health risks for those kept in overcrowded jails. Thereby, the pandemic has become a double-edged sword for those awaiting trials.

Bail as the rule 

The general principle of law is that bail is the norm and jail is the exception. However, the Courts have rejected numerous bail petitions. Another common phenomenon, especially in the pandemic times, has been that of the bail pleadings being postponed.

Recent Cases 

A prime example of this phenomenon is the case of doctor Kafeel Khan. The Allahabad High Court on 27th July 2020 deferred a hearing for Kafeel Khan for the 12th time in five months. Khan had been in Mathura jail since 29th January 2020. He was arrested for a speech he delivered at Uttar Pradesh’s Aligarh Muslim University. The Court granted him bail on 10th February, but he was not allowed to leave. On 13th February, the UP government levelled the National Security Act,1980 against him. Khan had earlier in 2018 spent several months in jail about an oxygen shortage crisis. He was later absolved of all charges through a government report.

Another critical case is that of Varavar Rao, where health concerns arose due to the pandemic. The 79-year-old Telugu poet was arrested over his alleged involvement in the Bhima Koregaon case. Rao had filed for an interim bail citing his frail health and susceptibility to COVID-19 in March. However, a special NIA Court rejected the plea, and the Court rejected it again for the second time in June. Rao tested positive for COVID-19 on 16th July.

Anti CAA protestors 

The pandemic has seen an alarming rise in arrests of political prisoners. The United Nations (UN) in June urged India to release anti CAA activists.

A statement released by the UN experts read, “Authorities should immediately release all human rights defenders who are currently being held in pre-trial detention without sufficient evidence, based on speeches they made criticising the discriminatory nature of the CAA.”

The statement mentions explicitly 11 individuals, including Meeran Haider, Gulfisha Fatima, Safoora Zargar, Asif Iqbal Tanha, Devangana Kalita, Natasha Narwal, Khalid Saifi, Shifa Ur Rehman, Dr Kafeel Khan, Sharjeel Imam and Akhil Gogoi. Prisoners like Akhil Gogoi and Sharjeel Imam are still in jail despite testing positive for the coronavirus.

The NIA on 28th July arrested Hany Babu, an Associate Professor of Delhi University. The arrest was in connection with the Elgar Parishad case in Mumbai.

Eleven other accused – Sudha Bharadwaj, Shoma Sen, Surendra Gadling, Mahesh Raut, Arun Ferreira, Sudhir Dhawale, Rona Wilson, Vernon Gonsalves, Varavara Rao, Anand Teltumbde and Gautam Navlakha were arrested earlier in the same case, and all are in jail now. The NIA took over the case from the Maharashtra Police in January 2020.

Remedies for undertrials

The Indian law provides for various protections for undertrials. Maneka Gandhi v Union of India established that access to speedy justice is a fundamental right. Hussainara Khatoon v. State of Bihar states that the State has the responsibility of establishing a process that ensures speedy justice. It said that financial constraints to set up infrastructure cannot be an excuse.

The Supreme Court in March observed that social distancing was difficult in prisons. There were 1339 prisons with approximately 4,66,084 inmates. The Court stated that the National Crime Records Bureau showed the occupancy rate of Indian prisons at 117.6%. As per NCRB data, more than half of prisoners in India are undertrials.

The Supreme Court asked the State Governments to consider giving parole to those facing up to seven-year jail term. This was an attempt at decongesting prisons on account of the COVID-19 outbreak. This makes the nature of crimes that prisoners are accused of, the primary factor for determining bail. Thereby, it provides no relief to political prisoners who are accused of grave crimes based on little to no evidence.

Impact of UAPA and NSA

Arrests of Anti CAA protestors and about the Bhima Koregaon case were under serious allegations. These arrests under the UAPA and NSA strip individuals of their usual defences against judicial delays. Law experts state that most of these arrests are based on flimsy evidence. Historical data shows that the conviction rates under these statues are very low. At the end of 2018, of the 2,008 cases under UAPA, only 317 were sent to trial. The draconian nature of these statutes allows them to be used as a tool to curb dissent.

Role of Courts

The statutes under which political prisoners are arrested leave them upto the mercy of courts. It must see that the leeway provided to the executive is not excessively applied. The bail application cannot depend merely on the nature of crimes they are accused of. The Courts need to take note of health factors and the evidence against a person. Furthermore, the Courts must recognise their duty in protecting the liberty of these citizens.

Granting bail is an essential remedy for undertrials. The Courts need to observe every bail application on its merits. It is upto the Courts to ensure that arrests under UAPA and NSA are not merely used as a means to threaten those opposing the government. The Courts must also treat bail applications on a priority basis. Every deferred hearing costs an individual more weeks or even months of being deprived of freedom.

Conclusion 

The Courts should not allow the pandemic to be misused as a tool by the government or the accused. A balance between social order and an individual’s rights must be struck. Bail applications need to be viewed with careful consideration to ensure justice. Judicial delays must not cost a person his or her right to freedom.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

US Court Orders Iran To Pay $1.4 BN in Damages To Missing Former FBI Agent’s Family

The United States District Court for the District of Columbia ordered Iran to pay in total $1.45 bn to the Levinson family in punitive...

Onus on Petitioner To Show Unassailable Facts: Delhi High Court

In the case of Rhythm Jain v National Testing Agency, the Delhi High Court mentioned that in such petitions the onus to prove the facts...

Under-Trial/Convicted Persons Do Not Have Absolute Right To Parole in Light of Coronavirus : Bombay High Court

An important judgment was given by the Division Bench of the Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court concerning the constitutionality of Rule 19 of...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Asks State To File Reply To Examine Whether Privacy Rights of an Individual Can Be Violated by Issuing an Executive...

A Writ Petition was instituted by an individual for violation of his fundamental rights by the State before the Madhya Pradesh High Court. The...

Bombay High Court Allows Export of Pending Consignment of Onions in Respect of Which Shipping Bills Have Been Generated Before Notification of the Ban

A writ petition challenging the notification dated 14th September 2020 to ban the export of onions was filed by the Exporters Association before the...

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding that mens rea is an...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @ Balli v State. The bench...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up testing facilities in Delhi.   Facts of...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has set aside the 24.07.2019 Order...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an order restraining the manufacturing, marketing,...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -