Is Offering Free COVID-19 Vaccine a Violation of the Poll Code?

Must Read

An Analysis of Cyber Crimes in India

The term “Cyber Crime” is not defined in Indian law. We can attribute this to the variety and capricious...

Explained: Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Act, 2020

The COVID-19 pandemic has brought various widespread impacts on every sector of the country, whether it is the corporates...

An Analysis of the Supreme Court’s Guidelines on the Ambit of Maintenance in Matrimonial Cases

The Supreme Court has laid down guidelines in the Rajesh vs. Neha case relating to the ambit of maintenance...

Explained: The OTT Regulations and Their Impact on the Media Future in India

The regulation of content within OTT (Over-the-Top) media and other digital media have fallen under the purview of the...

Frustration of Lease in COVID-19 Times

Introduction The year 2020 has been the most unexpected and the year of most unprecedented events in the history of...

Do All Insults Come Under the Ambit of SC/ST Act as Offence?

Introduction The Honourable Supreme court of India held that all insults or intimidation are not an offence under the Scheduled...

Follow us

On October 31st the Election Commission (EC) gave a clean chit to BJP in Bihar. The EC said that declaring free COVID-19 vaccine to the state of Bihar as part of election promises is not in violation of the poll code.

Introduction

India is one of the biggest electoral democracies in the world. Anyone who has been following the recent events happening in the country will doubt that statement. Democracy is crumbling under the weight of arbitrariness and manipulation. People are clueless as to where the country is headed. Justice is tampered with, and the welfare state is far from realization. Courts and law enforcement agencies are becoming tools of oppression. In such a background, the choice of people and freedom of choice is very important. At this juncture, elections play a significant role in deciding where the country is headed. Many factors affect the result of elections. One of those factors is the manifestos and agendas of parties. All of the parties have a lot to offer only during elections. This makes vote bank politics inevitable. Vote bank politics has been prevalent in the country since the birth of politics. Vote bank politics decided the fate of elections for a long. The welfare of the country is also in the hands of vote bank politics. Welfare is something that every person and political party in the country strives for. Welfare is an integral part of every promise and manifesto. But somehow these vote bank politics hamper the result of welfare.

Story so far

Bihar elections have been one of the most awaited elections of its time. One is because of its timing, and the next is because of all the political tension surrounding it and the many dramas staged. From The Mahagathbandhan to Nitish Kumar said it is his last election, so much went into the elections. And there are many more fates at play which will decide the result. Bihar had been one of the most affected states in all the sectors due to the pandemic. Be it the welfare of migrant workers or the people living in the state. Elections after the pandemic have various deciding factors. And Bihar is no less. Manifestos form an integral part of the elections. They show the sincerity of the parties towards the welfare and betterment of people. As the election was held in the shadow of a pandemic, the promises knew no bounds. One of the promises which wreaked havoc is the promise of a free COVID vaccine by the BJP. The manifesto stated that all the residents of the state would be given the free vaccine as soon as it is acquired. The promise was questioned on the basis that it violated the model conduct code. The EC gave a clean chit as a reply to the same. The EC stated certain provisions of the code substantiating its decision. While the BJP leaders gave different versions of clarifications, there has been a huge outlash by the opposition regarding the promise.

Analysis

The opposition slammed the ruling party for politicizing the pandemic. Pandemic has been ravaging the world. Instant and temporary solutions do not bring any change. The mandate of the elections should reflect the effectiveness of the ruling party in dealing with the pandemic. Only time can tell us the effectiveness and sincerity of these promises. The three provisions stated by the EC of India do not support the decision rather shatter the stand taken by the authority. The ruling party was using its position for providing such a promise. It is unethical. The provisions state that no promise should be in derogation of the Constitution. One of the basic principles of the Constitution is the right to equality. The state must treat everyone equally. But the promise of free vaccine to only Bihar is clearly in derogation of all the DPSPs and fundamental rights.

The central government must treat all the states equally irrespective of their political agenda. They could provide free vaccines to all the citizens of the country. One of the statements by EC states that parties should not make promises which they cannot fulfil. While there is no committed plan regarding the procurement of vaccines, the parties are already using it for their political gain. The rationality behind the promise is truly in derogation of the poll code. The promise is an undue influence over the people. There are no reality or welfare principles behind the promise. The question remains as to what happens when the mandate is not in their favour. The discovery of the vaccine is still in process and promising it for an election, shows where the democratic principles of the country have reached. The vaccine cannot be equated with free electricity or other necessary goods. Special circumstances call for special measures, and the vaccine is one such measure. It should not be trampled with. Everyone has a right to basic health under the right to life. So everyone should have access to the vaccine also without any terms and conditions.

Conclusion

There are further complaints of violations of the poll code against the ruling party. As we observe one of the first elections after the pandemic, this will decide other areas mandate also. The result will decide the fate of many parties not only locally but also across the nation. The polls are done, only the results will tell whether the voters bought the promise of the free vaccine. Hopefully, they should give the mandate accordingly and uphold the shattering constitutional principles.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgment from courts. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Transfer of Winding-up Proceedings Allowed Under S. 434, Restrictions Under 2016 Rules To Not Apply: Allahabad High Court

This appeal relates to the question of transfer of winding-up proceeding from the High Court (Company Court) to the NCLT.  Facts M/s. Girdhar Trading Company, 2nd...

Constitutional Court of South Africa Declares Provisions of Domestic Workers’ Injury Compensation Legislation To Be Unconstitutional

The Constitutional Court of South Africa in Sylvia Mahlangu v Minister of Labour , declared parts of the Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases...

Bail Granted Under Section 167(2) CrPC Can Be Cancelled Under Section 439(2) CrPC: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court held that the right of default bail of the Accused can be cancelled under Section 439(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. Facts...

Authority Cannot Interfere With Legal Heir Certificate When There Are No Issues Between 2 Wives: Madras High Court

The petition, filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India in Madras High Court. The case of Lakshmi Jagannathan v. The Tahsildar, Tambaram Taluk, Chennai. was...

Kerala High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Notification of Bar Council on Spot Admission

On 23rd November 2020, the Kerala High Court involving a single bench judge of the Honourable Smt. Justice P.V. Asha heard the case of...

Death in Police Custody Requires Post-Mortem: Madras High Court

The petition, filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in Madras High Court. The case of S. Prema v. The Superintendent of...

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order and states “Liberty of a Citizen cannot be taken away in the Absence of Lawyer”

In the case of Parveen v. State of Haryana, the Hon’ble Supreme Court observed that “a citizen’s liberty cannot be taken away”. This observation...

Revised Gratuity Ceiling Notified by Central Government Applicable To All Establishments Irrespective of Whether Controlled by the State or Centre: Tripura High Court

In the case of Sri Tapas Guha vs Tripura Tea Development Corporation Ltd. and others, a single-judge bench comprising of Hon’ble Justice Akil Kureshi...

Madras High Court Dismisses Tax Case Appeal by OPG Energy Pvt. Ltd.

The OPG Energy Pvt. Ltd. filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It was filed against an order passed...

Jharkhand High Court Disposes of Criminal Revision Petition Against the Judgment Passed by the Learned Sessions Judge With Modification

A criminal revision petition against the Judgment dated 23.07.2014 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, West Singhbhum at Chaibasa in Criminal Appeal No.49/2014 was...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -