Will Implementation of the Forest Rights Act 2006 by Jammu & Kashmir Safeguard the Forest Dweller’s Rights?

Must Read

What is the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016?

The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (“RERA”) is an Act of the Parliament. It seeks to protect...

Should the Exorbitant Amounts Charged for RT-PCR Tests be Refunded?

Introduction A plea has been filed in the Honourable Supreme Court of India seeking a refund of exorbitant amounts charged...

Should CCTV’s be Installed in the Police Station?

Introduction In a recent judgment, the bench led by Justice Nariman issued directions to both the state and Union Territory...

A Legal Analysis of the West Bengal Political Crisis on IPS Deputation

The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has recently summoned three IPS officers of West Bengal (WB). The decision was...

Explained: Postal Ballot for NRIs

At the end of November 2020, Election Commission sent a proposal to the law ministry to amend the Representation...

Explained: Constitutional Provisions and Legislations With Regards to a Person with Disabilities

The world celebrates December 3 as International Day of Persons with Disabilities (IDPD). This day is also called World...

Follow us

The government of J&K will implement the Forest Rights Act, 2006 in the union territory which was inapplicable for the last 14 years.

What has been decided?

A meeting chaired by Chief Secretary of J&K, B.V.R. Subrahmanyam took place on 18 Nov to review the implementation of the Scheduled Tribes and other Traditional Forest Dwellers Act and Rules. This Act is known as the Forest Rights Act (FRA), 2006 grants & safeguards the rights of forest dwellers. After the abrogation of Article 370 & split of the State of J&K into 2 UTs, the Act became applicable in the UTs.

The forest rights committee is to complete the survey of claimants by January 15, 2021. They have to assess the nature & extent of rights claimed at the village level. The survey has to be further submitted to the respective sub-divisional committees. They shall complete the process of scrutinizing the claims & preparing the ‘record of forest rights’ by or before Jan 31, 2021. The district-level committees have to consider & approve the records, thereby granting forest rights by March 1, 2021.

The spokesperson said that the department of tribal affairs & forest, ecology & environment has already started working in the direction of its implementation in Oct, this year. Forest-dwelling STs & other traditional forest dwellers are provided with other rights over the forest lands. These rights include using the forest lands for habitation or self-cultivation. Besides this, rights like livelihood, ownership, access to use, collect & dispose of minor forest produce & entitlement to seasonal resources among others are granted. The rights provided under the FRA, 2006 are however heritable & not alienable or transferable. Hence, people are not allowed to gain from the sale & purchase of the forest land.

The Chief Secretary has given deadlines to constitute a four-tier committee immediately. They are to settle the claims of tribes of J&K. The committee will include, state-level monitoring committee, district-level committee, sub-divisional level committee, forest rights committee. They will implement the Act in the UT. The forest department is also asked to devise a review mechanism along with a monitoring format. This will be suitable for the periodic review of the process & procedures associated with this Act.

Who are forest dwellers?

Forest dwellers are persons who primarily live in forest or forest lands. They are dependent on forests or forest lands for livelihood. These self-sustaining people, also indulge in self-cultivation for livelihood. They voluntarily protect the forests for afforestation activities. They also prevent the illegal cutting of forests or timber theft. However, a person must qualify as a forest dweller to claim the rights under FRA. First, that person must be a member of ST. In case the person fails to prove that, he/she must show continuous residence for 75 years in the forest. Out of the billions of people who inhabit India, seventy million of the total population consists of tribals. They are scattered throughout the country. They have always been dependent on biodiversity for their survival.

Forest Rights Act, 2006

The Act was enacted on 29 Dec 2006. FRA provides for granting of rights to forest dwellers & known communities attached to forests across the country. The Act became applicable after the revocation of special status for J&K under Article 370. The rights of such dwellers & communities are recognized for the first time after 14 years. The dwellers in J&K will now be entitled to various rights. The Act provides for the use of one hectare of forest land on the recommendation of the respective Gram Sabha. The dwellers are not expected to live in a primitive type of isolation. For this, they can use the land to develop government facilities like schools, roads, hospitals, minor water bodies, etc. They are also enjoined to protect the wildlife, forest, water source, biodiversity, etc besides ensuring the preservation of forest-dwelling STs & other traditional forest dwellers.

Criticism of the decision

The kutcha houses belonging to Gujjars & Bakarwals communities were razed down a week before this decision. In the remote areas of Pahalgam, the homes of nomads were demolished. Authorities were issuing notices to people asking them to clear the land. According to the authorities, people were occupying those lands illegally. Mehbooba Mufti has also condemned this move of evicting the Gujjars & Bakarwals. She calls this a part of BJP’s larger policies of changing the demography of the Muslim majority region in Kashmir. She even accused the government of putting J&K on sale. Dr. Raja Muzaffar, chairman of the RTI movement has said that the Forest Department officials are issuing eviction notices under section 79-A of Forest Act, 1927. He criticized the decision of implementing FRA, 2006. He said that if the government has plans to extend this law to J&K, then why are they harassing the forest dwellers.

Empowerment of STs after implementation of the Act 

While some are criticizing the decision of implementing FRA, 2006 in J&K many are appreciating the move. Dr. Javid Rahi, a tribal scholar welcomed the decision. He expressed his gratitude in a meeting of tribes. The implementation of the Act will develop a sense of confidence among the forest-dwelling communities. Especially Gujjars, Bakarwals who were suppressed for a long time will now be empowered. Its implementation will end the discrimination & injustice among the tribal people & forest dwellers. They can now manage the forest lands independently within the village boundaries. This will protect Gujjars, Gaddis, Bakarwals against the forced displacement & eviction from forest lands.

Conclusion 

Forest dwellers who are recognized & cherished as “keeper of forests” have been neglected in Jammu & Kashmir for several decades. People of J&K were not entitled to the benefit of laws when the Act came into force. Even after the abrogation of Article 370, they were struggling to claim their forest rights. After this decision, people expect that the government will implement the Act as quickly as possible. It will help the tribals & forest dwellers to protect & preserve their rituals, traditions & culture. This drastic change in the attitude of the authorities to stop treating the forest dwellers as “deemed homeless” was the need of the hour. This historical move will end the age-old discrimination & injustice which the forest dwellers & tribals were a part of.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

WhatsApp Emails Delhi HC Judge Asking Her Not To Hear the Plea Challenging New Privacy Policy

The Delhi High Court raised strong objection to an E-mail sent by WhatsApp asking a judge not to hear the plea which challenges its new privacy policy. Justice Pratibha Singh said that the e-mail that was withdrawn later was totally unwarranted as she was anyway going to recuse from hearing the plea which was filed by Rohilla Chaitanya who contends that the new privacy policy of WhatsApp provides 360-degree access to a customer’s virtual activity and is against the fundamental right of privacy.

TRP Scam Case: Bombay HC Extends Protection To Arnab Goswami and Other Employees Till the Next Hearing

On Friday, the Bombay High court extended the protection that was given, to Republic TV’s Editor in Chief Arnab Goswami and other employees of ARG Outlier Media Private Limited till January 29th in the alleged case of Television Rating Point manipulation. A status report was submitted by the police to the division bench of Justices S.S.Shinde and Manish Pitale by the Police on the ongoing case.

Plea Seeks FIR Against Maharashtra Minister Dhananjay Munde in Bombay HC for False Info

A plea has been filed in Bombay High Court seeking an FIR against Maharashtra minister Dhananjay Munde who is undergoing times of trouble due to his extra-marital affair. Recently, an FIR had been lodged against Munde by a woman, accusing him of raping her sister. Munde clarified that he was actually in a relationship with that woman and had two children. He accused the two women of blackmailing him.

Writ Petition for Compensation Accepted by Calcutta High Court 

Introduction The Petitioner Purna Ch. Biswas filed a Writ Petition with the complaint that their claims for a higher quantum of compensation have not yet...

No Members Could Be Disqualified Without Authorisation by Political Party: Gujarat High Court

Excerpt The dispute application no.7 of 2020 filed by respondent no.2 before designated authority. Thereafter the designated authority order dated 28.10.2020 disqualified the petitioner and...

Delhi High Court Directs Delhi Jal Board To Make Supply of Potable Drinking Water

The High Court of Delhi in the matter of Delhi Sainik Cooperation Housing Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors held that right to...

Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders Security To BJP Leader Alleged for Not Supporting Farmers Protest

The Order had come in the form of a Writ Petition filed by Tikshan Sood under Article 226 of the Constitution. The petition before...

Lahore High Court Outlaws Two-Finger Virginity Test

The Lahore High Court in Pakistan has outlawed the use and conduct of virginity tests, namely, the use of the “two-finger” virginity test and...

London Court Rejects Assange’s Extradition – What Happens Now? 

Earlier last week, District Judge Vanessa Baraitser, sitting in the Westminster Magistrates’ Court denied the Government of the U.S.A.'s request to the U.K. to...

Calcutta High Court Decides in Favor of Contractor as He Accidentally Pays an Excessively High Amount

Introduction The present writ petition has been filed for a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondents to revoke the Petitioner’s offer as...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -