How is India’s Age-Old Criminal Justice System Failing Rape Victims

Must Read

What is the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016?

The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (“RERA”) is an Act of the Parliament. It seeks to protect...

Should the Exorbitant Amounts Charged for RT-PCR Tests be Refunded?

Introduction A plea has been filed in the Honourable Supreme Court of India seeking a refund of exorbitant amounts charged...

Should CCTV’s be Installed in the Police Station?

Introduction In a recent judgment, the bench led by Justice Nariman issued directions to both the state and Union Territory...

A Legal Analysis of the West Bengal Political Crisis on IPS Deputation

The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has recently summoned three IPS officers of West Bengal (WB). The decision was...

Explained: Postal Ballot for NRIs

At the end of November 2020, Election Commission sent a proposal to the law ministry to amend the Representation...

Explained: Constitutional Provisions and Legislations With Regards to a Person with Disabilities

The world celebrates December 3 as International Day of Persons with Disabilities (IDPD). This day is also called World...

Follow us

The increasing drop at conviction rates in cases of rape & other sexual violence against women brings all us to question the age-old Criminal Justice System (“CJS“) of India.

The Decline in Conviction Rates

According to the reports of the National Crime Records Bureau (“NCRB“), crimes against women have taken a steep rise across India. Every 16 minutes, a woman becomes a victim of rape. An average of 87 rape cases on a daily basis was recorded in 2019. Of over 3,38,000 reported cases of crime against women, 33,000 were for rape alone in the year 2018. Each year the data appears to be more horrifying.

There has been a sharp increase in the percentage rate of undertrials who are charged with a crime against women. Approx. 70% of prisoners in India are undertrials. This data has increased at a faster rate as compared to the conviction rates. Surprisingly, the conviction rate for rape has fallen down from 32.2% to 27.2%. In 2018, out of 17,313 cases in which trials were completed, 11,133 were acquitted & only in 4,708 cases, conviction took place. All these figures point to the failure to deliver justice to the rape victims. Although the number of reported rape cases are increasing, still the social stigma is attached to the victim and not the perpetrator. A vast majority of the complainants do not even get justice. All this has led the wrongdoers to re-offend as they are comforted by the knowledge that they will never be held accountable. This in turn is creating more victims because of the failing CJS.

Criminal Justice System: Victim Oriented or Accused Oriented?

The low conviction rates are the result of ineffective CJS. This has made the people lose faith in the judiciary & in the system at large, which is very dangerous.

The age-old CJS is the legacy of the British system. Its implementation rests upon three institutions: the police, the judiciary & the prosecutors. Its aim is to protect individual rights & liberty against others. However, it has not undergone any significant change even after several years of independence. Under our procedural criminal law, the accused is treated as a privileged person. They are protected under Article 20, 21 & 22 of the Indian Constitution. But when it comes to the victim, only a few provisions afford assistance & compensation to the victim in the crime. It seems as if the victim is a forgotten party to CJS. It entirely focuses on protecting, punishing, reforming & rehabilitating the offender. But the victim is left with little or no such assistance. Even if compensation is made available to the victim under Section 357(1) of CrPC, it is inadequate in the present world. Such compensation is only awarded in cases of sentences and not acquittal of the accused.

Rape is one of the heinous crimes against a woman. It is not only a crime against an individual but also against society. It does not merely inflict wounds upon a woman’s body, but also to her mind & soul. In Bodhisattwa Gautam v Subhra Chakraborty, the Apex Court has correctly held rape as an offense against the basic human right as also the fundamental right of personal liberty and life. Despite the gravity of the act, there has been no strong step taken by the country to put an end to it. Although the Government has taken major steps in increasing the punishment of the accused in rape cases, no positive step has been made to reduce the suffering of a woman. The recommendation for reforming the century-old CJS, by a panel headed by Justice V.S. Malimath, has still not been implemented. It was pointed out by the committee that the existing system weighs in favor of the accused. It does not focus on justice to the victims of crime.

The Failing Criminal Justice System

The age-old CJS is based on outdated laws. It is badly failing to meet the ends of justice in the 21st century. It is no longer effective to accomplish the aim to protect the rights & liberty of an individual. Moreover, it has led to people getting harassed by government agencies. It has put immense pressure on the judiciary. Even after years of fighting, the system does not seem to deliver justice. About 3.5 crore cases are pending according to the Economic Survey for the year 2018-2019. Starting from the stage of reporting cases to its adjudication, the victim has to face a lot of hurdles. And at each stage of CJS, cases keeps on dropping. That is why the prosecution of rape cases is lower relative to the reported cases, and the conviction rate is even lower.

Despite widespread protests, media attention against the brutal cases of rape against women & girls, no reform has been made to the system. The police, which is at the front foot of CJS have failed to perform their vital role in administering justice. In such a situation, it is expected that rule of law cannot exist. Also, the Criminal Law Amendment Act of 2013 & the Criminal Law Amendment Act of 2018 did not change the situation. Despite the establishment of fast track courts, there has been significant growth in rape cases and delay in adjudication of those cases. This points to the failure to prevent the commission of rape. The CJS should not only administer justice to the victim & reforming the criminal but also to prevent the happening of the act.

There has been a gradual change in the gravity of committing rape. The famous cases of Nirbhaya, Kathua, Unnao, Hathras depicts the inhuman nature of a man. The mourning of the entire country & the anger towards the CJS has still not being acknowledged. Failure of CJS is the reason people were celebrating the killing of the 4 suspects in the gang rape of Hyderabad. This act of police was praised across the country because people can no longer keep their silence on the failing CJS. But taking law & order into our hands is no solution where the accused does not undergo a fair trial. And so there needs to be a necessary reform in the present CJS, to eliminate the cause of potential crime itself.

What Can be Done?

Now, the burden is on the Indian Government to stop letting rape to be treated as a political issue. The necessary reforms had to be made to ensure that the CJS is responsive to the needs of the survivor. It must be reformed to handle the increasing rape cases that are pending in the country. The existing laws need to be implemented & be made more effective & also to introduce procedural reforms. A more responsible & accountable police force handling rape cases with high sensitivity is the need of the hour. Furthermore, some important recommendations of the Malimath Committee should be implemented to meet the ends of justice in the present time. However, the reforms should be made with utmost care & caution. A more reformative just curious needs to be focused upon by our policy-makers.

Conclusion

Presently, the CJS is in a state of peril. India needs a more clear policy by making some necessary reform in the provisions of CrPC, IPC legislated in pursuant to CJS. Such reform would be ineffective unless & until improvements are made in the police, judiciary, prosecution & in prisons. The roots of the existing laws have to be much stronger to deliver justice to the victims.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

WhatsApp Emails Delhi HC Judge Asking Her Not To Hear the Plea Challenging New Privacy Policy

The Delhi High Court raised strong objection to an E-mail sent by WhatsApp asking a judge not to hear the plea which challenges its new privacy policy. Justice Pratibha Singh said that the e-mail that was withdrawn later was totally unwarranted as she was anyway going to recuse from hearing the plea which was filed by Rohilla Chaitanya who contends that the new privacy policy of WhatsApp provides 360-degree access to a customer’s virtual activity and is against the fundamental right of privacy.

TRP Scam Case: Bombay HC Extends Protection To Arnab Goswami and Other Employees Till the Next Hearing

On Friday, the Bombay High court extended the protection that was given, to Republic TV’s Editor in Chief Arnab Goswami and other employees of ARG Outlier Media Private Limited till January 29th in the alleged case of Television Rating Point manipulation. A status report was submitted by the police to the division bench of Justices S.S.Shinde and Manish Pitale by the Police on the ongoing case.

Plea Seeks FIR Against Maharashtra Minister Dhananjay Munde in Bombay HC for False Info

A plea has been filed in Bombay High Court seeking an FIR against Maharashtra minister Dhananjay Munde who is undergoing times of trouble due to his extra-marital affair. Recently, an FIR had been lodged against Munde by a woman, accusing him of raping her sister. Munde clarified that he was actually in a relationship with that woman and had two children. He accused the two women of blackmailing him.

Writ Petition for Compensation Accepted by Calcutta High Court 

Introduction The Petitioner Purna Ch. Biswas filed a Writ Petition with the complaint that their claims for a higher quantum of compensation have not yet...

No Members Could Be Disqualified Without Authorisation by Political Party: Gujarat High Court

Excerpt The dispute application no.7 of 2020 filed by respondent no.2 before designated authority. Thereafter the designated authority order dated 28.10.2020 disqualified the petitioner and...

Delhi High Court Directs Delhi Jal Board To Make Supply of Potable Drinking Water

The High Court of Delhi in the matter of Delhi Sainik Cooperation Housing Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors held that right to...

Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders Security To BJP Leader Alleged for Not Supporting Farmers Protest

The Order had come in the form of a Writ Petition filed by Tikshan Sood under Article 226 of the Constitution. The petition before...

Lahore High Court Outlaws Two-Finger Virginity Test

The Lahore High Court in Pakistan has outlawed the use and conduct of virginity tests, namely, the use of the “two-finger” virginity test and...

London Court Rejects Assange’s Extradition – What Happens Now? 

Earlier last week, District Judge Vanessa Baraitser, sitting in the Westminster Magistrates’ Court denied the Government of the U.S.A.'s request to the U.K. to...

Calcutta High Court Decides in Favor of Contractor as He Accidentally Pays an Excessively High Amount

Introduction The present writ petition has been filed for a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondents to revoke the Petitioner’s offer as...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -