Explained: The OTT Regulations and Their Impact on the Media Future in India

Must Read

An Analysis of the Supreme Court of India’s Decision in Saurav Yadav v. State of Uttar Pradesh on Reservation

Reservation is one of the debatable realities of Indian constitution. This system got its roots from the exploitations due...

Explained: The Political Crisis in Nepal

On December 20th, K P Sharma Oli, the Prime Minister of Nepal dissolved the Lower House Parliament of the...

Can the Relatives of the Husband Attract Prosecution in Case of Triple Talaq?

The Supreme Court of India has recently made a judgement. It lays down that the relatives of the husband...

Explained: The Right to be Forgotten in India

Right to Privacy is an essential fundamental right which has been enshrined in the Indian Constitution under Article 21...

How will the New WhatsApp Privacy Policy Affect Us?

On January 4, 2020, the California based tech giant WhatsApp announced its new privacy law. It allows data integration...

India’s International ‘Retrospective Taxation’ Regime Vis-a-Vis PCA Rulings in Vodafone and Cairn in 2020

The imposition of retrospective taxation of foreign companies doing business in India has been at the helm of controversy...

Follow us

The regulation of content within OTT (Over-the-Top) media and other digital media have fallen under the purview of the Information and Broadcasting (I&B) Ministry. The Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeiTY) was relieved of this responsibility under a notification issued by the Central Government on 9th November 2020.

Introduction

The issue of regulating OTT content was first brought to the Court in October 2018. The Justice for Rights Foundation had filed a suit in the Delhi High Court seeking to create a proper structure to regulate online content. The further imposition of regulations on the platforms distributing the content was also suggested. In response to a notice sent by the Court to the government, the Ministry of Electronics and Information technology had stated that the IT Act was enough to regulate online content. This was found to be enough by the Court, and the plea was thus dismissed. In the Padmanabh Shankar vs Union of India case, a suit was filed to bring online video content under the purview of the Cinematograph Act, 1952. This required films to have an approval certificate from the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC). Here, the Karnataka Court observed that online content did not fall under the Cinematograph Act, 1952 and hence the suit got dismissed. The Firoz Iqbal Khan vs The Union of India case is important to the decision of the government. Here, the Supreme Court had asked the Centre for its opinion to improve upon the practice of self-regulation done by the media. In response, the Centre had issued the order to bring digital video streaming services under the purview of the I&B ministry.

The CBFC and the BCCC

The Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) is a body which is part of the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting. The CBFC is notorious for its harsh censorship rules which are criticized for being conservative. Online media platforms such as Netflix and Amazon Prime have been a platform for artists to explore their creativity. This is owing to the deregulated nature of these platforms. But, the arrival of the CBFC in the online media platform scenario is indeed going to be troublesome. A considerable number of movies and shows have embraced some highly modern values which would not sit well for the orthodox members of the CBFC. Films such as Udta Punjab, Sameer, and The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo were censored. Some films were denied a ‘U’ certificate citing outlandish reasons. The Broadcasting Content Complaints Council (BCCC) is another statutory body under the I&B ministry. They have come under criticism for the censoring of topics such as homosexuality. Segments got removed from shows as they didn’t adhere to certain ‘Indian values’. A backlash occurred when an episode from season 5 of Game of Thrones got cut from its original length. The 45-minute episode got cut to 22 minutes, censoring important parts of the story. The censorship laws within the country are stringent. Thus, TV channels and film production houses exercise a high degree of self-censorship. This is in practice to avoid coming under scrutiny from the government. OTT media coming under the purview of the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting would result in online content regulation coming under the purview of the CBFC and the BCCC. This marks the first time where the I&B Ministry is stepping foot in digital media. This decision will affect online news outlets and almost all forms of media currently operating online. Fearing censorship by the government, OTT media platforms have devised a code. This code would dictate which content streamed within these platforms would get scrutinised. This code included the prohibition of any slander to the national emblem, child pornography promoting content, any content that may hurt any religious sentiments, and content that has become banned in the country by a court of law. But this got rejected by the government.

The Future of Indian Media

The fourth estate is an essential pillar of democracy. Media plays an important role in determining the thought process of the masses. This is why the media has been highly regulated in countries that have a low democracy index. The freedom of the media of a country determines how receptive society will be to new ideas and achieving a more global outlook. Censoring of the media will result in the censoring of new ideas and new creative thoughts. Only at a pace where a free and thriving media thrives, will there be progress and harmony. Media has always been a source of creativity and a medium for the voice of the people. Without such a medium, where the people can express adequate dissent, the very concept of democracy becomes watered down. India has fallen to the 51st position within the EIU democratic index. The democratic score of India has fallen, making our country a flawed democracy. The EIU has stated that the fall in civil liberties within the country has been the main cause of its downfall in the Index. Further censorship of the media can only result in further degradation of democracy. This contributes to the formation of a country with few democratic values. Article 19 of the Indian Constitution grants the citizens of India the right to freedom of speech and expression. Whether these regulations would uphold the standards of the Constitution or not remains to be seen.

Conclusion

The transfer of control to the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting is a movie that has many political and legal aspects to it. The government is in the process of designing a new framework for the regulation of OTT content. This new framework has the responsibility to uphold the integrity of the media within the nation. Time will determine their impact on the future of the Indian media.


Libertatem. in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgment from courts. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

“Dismissal Without Inquiry Is Justified if Employee Did Not Prove Minimum Working Period”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the dispute relating to the termination of an employee without any disciplinary inquiry. Brief facts of the case The Respondent, Smt. Sureshwati was...

“Rape Victim To Be Provided Shelter Due To Media Attention Prohibited Under Section 228A of the IPC”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the petition by a rape victim for rehabilitation as she was social ostracization.  Brief facts of the case In this case, a writ...

Benefit of Probation Not Excluded by the Provisions of Mandatory Minimum Sentence Under Section 397 of Ipc

This case concerns the dispute regarding the granting of probation on good conduct to the accused under the age of twenty-one years.   Brief facts of...

Supreme Court Asks for the Centre’s Response on PIL Filed Seeking the Formation of a Media Tribunal

The Supreme Court sought responses from the Press Council of India (PCI), News Broadcasters Association (NBA) on a PIL which sought to set up a media tribunal to tackle issues concerning the media like complaints against media, channels, and networks. Media has become like an unruly horse that has to be tamed to express the plea.

Law Student Asked the Supreme Court To Take Suo Moto Cognizance of the Violent Farmer Protests

A law student of Mumbai University, Ashish Rai has asked the Supreme Court to take Suo Moto Cognizance of the insult to the national flag done by the farmer protests at the Red Fort. In the course of the farmer's tractor rally on Tuesday, some of the protesters unfurled their own flags by entering the premises of the Red Fort.

Farmers Meeting With the Supreme Court Committee Postponed To Jan 29 Due To the Traffic Restrictions

Due to the traffic restrictions after the violent protests broke out on Republic Day, the meeting of farmers with the Supreme Court Committee that was supposed to take place today was postponed to 29th January.

Supreme Court Stays Bombay HC Judgment which said Groping without Skin Contact Not Sexual Assault under POCSO

The National Commission for Women (NCW) has challenged the Bombay High Court judgment where it stated that groping a child’s breasts without any ‘skin-to-skin’ contact will not be considered as sexual assault as defined under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act.

Supreme Court Classifying Employees Based on Educational Qualifications for Promotion or Appointment Is Neither Violative of Article 14 nor of Article 16

This case concerns the dispute relating to the classification of employees belonging to the homogenous group based on educational qualifications. Brief facts of the case The...

Supreme Court Refuses To Transfer Petitions To Itself Related To ‘Love Jihad’ Filed in Allahabad High Court

On Monday, the Supreme Court refused to entertain the plea which was filed by the UP Government regarding the transfer of all the pleas challenging the ordinance the court passed, from Allahabad High Court to the Supreme Court.

Bombay HC Nagpur Bench Holds That Groping a Girl Without ‘Skin To Skin’ Contact Is Not Sexual Assault

The Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court acquitted a man charged under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO) and convicted him of a minor offence under IPC stating that there was no direct physical contact.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -