Abandoned Refugees: Do Governments and Countries Actually Work for them?

Must Read

An Analysis of the Supreme Court of India’s Decision in Saurav Yadav v. State of Uttar Pradesh on Reservation

Reservation is one of the debatable realities of Indian constitution. This system got its roots from the exploitations due...

Explained: The Political Crisis in Nepal

On December 20th, K P Sharma Oli, the Prime Minister of Nepal dissolved the Lower House Parliament of the...

Can the Relatives of the Husband Attract Prosecution in Case of Triple Talaq?

The Supreme Court of India has recently made a judgement. It lays down that the relatives of the husband...

Explained: The Right to be Forgotten in India

Right to Privacy is an essential fundamental right which has been enshrined in the Indian Constitution under Article 21...

How will the New WhatsApp Privacy Policy Affect Us?

On January 4, 2020, the California based tech giant WhatsApp announced its new privacy law. It allows data integration...

India’s International ‘Retrospective Taxation’ Regime Vis-a-Vis PCA Rulings in Vodafone and Cairn in 2020

The imposition of retrospective taxation of foreign companies doing business in India has been at the helm of controversy...

Follow us

Thousands of refugees have been abandoned at sea by the Greek officials in the past few months. Many were left at the coast for rescue. Greece denies all the accusations of illegal pushback of the refugees.

Introduction:

Refugee problems never seem to die down. We have seen a lot, from a three-year-old boy washed up onto the shore to people being dumped in the ocean. All these show the pathetic situation of refugees. It has been years since the introduction of a global refugee regime. Nevertheless, the problems and the tragedies have intensified. The casualties have always occurred in the Mediterranean region for years, and no regime is sufficient enough to stop them. Recently another one of the debacles has taken place in this region. Greece has been asked several times to look into the pushback claims. But it never heeds the same and says all is done for “border management”. Border management is always way more important than a person’s life. That is where the world and humanity are headed. People’s lives cannot become a trade-off for border management. But that is a discussion for another day—the present discussion about the huge gap between the existing law and implementation of the same.

The story so far:

Greece has been facing the heat of refugee problem since the onset of the Syrian refugee crisis. The hatred towards migrants and refugees have been prevalent throughout the world. Everyone wants the protection of their own country and homes, but none think about the abandoned or stranded people due to war or any other inevitable reasons. They need not welcome them with all the luxurious amenities, but they could at least help them live. Governments and people are selfish; they have built more walls to restrict people. The walls would not stop the war or refugee crisis; the people once on the move are always moving. They would not stop until they have a place to stay safe. Europe and Greece can be that safe place for many. But there is an agreement between Turkey and Europe that no migrant or refugees will pass from the Turkey border into Europe. But the fire has been once again ignited when on 20th February 2020 Turkey told that it would not restrict anyone crossing the border. But people who crossed the border faced a complete violent situation of pelting and shooting as the border was only opened on one end.

Greece would have reacted on a more humanitarian ground, but it chose not to. Greece has violated all the international laws, including the most important human rights. Well, it did not stop there, there was more to the story when last month almost 1072 migrants were stranded at sea for being rescued by the Turkey coast guard. It has been reported by the New York Times. But the Prime Minister denies all these allegations and tells that the media should be more careful while reporting such incidents and he even remarks that Greece always followed “Rule of Law”.

Analysis:

Now the question comes as to whether Greece and Europe were justified by blocking their countries from migrants. Lets for a second keep all the humanitarian grounds and human rights aside and look at the situation. There was an agreement which was flawed, but very much in existence as to the blocking of borders. Although the foundation of the agreement, which is Turkey the safe place to host migrants and Europe paying for the same is flawed, it is not entirely a big problem. It was a temporary solution which has been violated by Turkey in this scenario. Knowing that Europe would not open the borders, Turkey should not have risked the lives of many. That would be one of the reasons why we cannot blame Greece for its inhumane acts. When Turkey says it is protecting refugees, why put their lives in the limbo in the first place. The second reason could be the pandemic and self-preservation. This pandemic is a period of testing times. It changed people’s perspective of the world. But can we totally blame Europe for the abandonment? They have faced a lot of issues since the onset of the refugee problem. There has been many casualties, reports of increased crime and many more dangerous violations in the continent, which might be due to the fact of increased refugees and asylum seekers. Preservation of one’s own life comes before anything.

There is an international refugee regime, the 1951 Convention. Greece is a signatory of the Convention. The Convention provides for basic rights, and it is completely made for the refugees and protection of their interests. The Convention never spoke about the protection of the people of the host country. It never imagined this possibility of migrant people going against the help providers. There are aspects of statelessness creeping in, and the refugees or migrants want to make the host land their own, which might be dangerous in cases of a huge number of refugees. The regime provides for three solutions- repatriation to the home country, integration in the host state and resettlement to a third state. Each of these has its own shortcomings. But Turkey could have chosen any one of these solutions instead of pushing the refugees into Greece. Greece clearly does not want refugees. The main reason for the migration is Turkey takes millions of refugees, and they are growing at a risky level. And to repeat the facts, the regime does not provide for the protection of migrants. As these are the people who are not fleeing war or any such emergency situation, Greece is under no obligation to protect them. So clearly to reiterate Greece cannot be blamed. This is all the flip side of the story and the defences Europe should have taken.

Now to look at it on a humanitarian principle, Europe and Greece could have done it better although they are under no obligation to do the same. They should not have abandoned; they should have at least showed the concern for human life.

 Conclusion:

Times have changed, so did people and the governments. Government choose what is best for one’s country people as they say. In this era of borders and walls and discrimination, refugees are threatened, and they also need protection along with other people. It is the duty of the governments to do the cost-benefit analysis, but the question remains should the price always be the lives of people. It is left to the people and governments to decide upon that as well. Hopefully, they take the stand on a humanitarian basis.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgment from courts. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

 

 

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

“Dismissal Without Inquiry Is Justified if Employee Did Not Prove Minimum Working Period”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the dispute relating to the termination of an employee without any disciplinary inquiry. Brief facts of the case The Respondent, Smt. Sureshwati was...

“Rape Victim To Be Provided Shelter Due To Media Attention Prohibited Under Section 228A of the IPC”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the petition by a rape victim for rehabilitation as she was social ostracization.  Brief facts of the case In this case, a writ...

Benefit of Probation Not Excluded by the Provisions of Mandatory Minimum Sentence Under Section 397 of Ipc

This case concerns the dispute regarding the granting of probation on good conduct to the accused under the age of twenty-one years.   Brief facts of...

Supreme Court Asks for the Centre’s Response on PIL Filed Seeking the Formation of a Media Tribunal

The Supreme Court sought responses from the Press Council of India (PCI), News Broadcasters Association (NBA) on a PIL which sought to set up a media tribunal to tackle issues concerning the media like complaints against media, channels, and networks. Media has become like an unruly horse that has to be tamed to express the plea.

Law Student Asked the Supreme Court To Take Suo Moto Cognizance of the Violent Farmer Protests

A law student of Mumbai University, Ashish Rai has asked the Supreme Court to take Suo Moto Cognizance of the insult to the national flag done by the farmer protests at the Red Fort. In the course of the farmer's tractor rally on Tuesday, some of the protesters unfurled their own flags by entering the premises of the Red Fort.

Farmers Meeting With the Supreme Court Committee Postponed To Jan 29 Due To the Traffic Restrictions

Due to the traffic restrictions after the violent protests broke out on Republic Day, the meeting of farmers with the Supreme Court Committee that was supposed to take place today was postponed to 29th January.

Supreme Court Stays Bombay HC Judgment which said Groping without Skin Contact Not Sexual Assault under POCSO

The National Commission for Women (NCW) has challenged the Bombay High Court judgment where it stated that groping a child’s breasts without any ‘skin-to-skin’ contact will not be considered as sexual assault as defined under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act.

Supreme Court Classifying Employees Based on Educational Qualifications for Promotion or Appointment Is Neither Violative of Article 14 nor of Article 16

This case concerns the dispute relating to the classification of employees belonging to the homogenous group based on educational qualifications. Brief facts of the case The...

Supreme Court Refuses To Transfer Petitions To Itself Related To ‘Love Jihad’ Filed in Allahabad High Court

On Monday, the Supreme Court refused to entertain the plea which was filed by the UP Government regarding the transfer of all the pleas challenging the ordinance the court passed, from Allahabad High Court to the Supreme Court.

Bombay HC Nagpur Bench Holds That Groping a Girl Without ‘Skin To Skin’ Contact Is Not Sexual Assault

The Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court acquitted a man charged under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO) and convicted him of a minor offence under IPC stating that there was no direct physical contact.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -