Supreme Court Orders Airtel, Idea, and Vodafone to Disclose Details of Tariff Offers to TRAI

Must Read

Delhi High Court Disposes Ashok Arora’s Appeal Against Suspension From Supreme Court Bar Association

In the present Petition, Senior Advocate Ashok Arora challenged an Order passed by a Single Judge bench. The Order...

Allahabad High Court Dismisses Application To Quash Prima Facie Allegations of Criminal Intimidation and Outraging Modesty

Allahabad High Court, on 17th November 2020, dismissed an application filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. and refused to...

Delhi High Court Prohibits Gathering in Public Places To Celebrate Chhat Puja

The Order had come in a Writ Petition moved by Shri Durga Jan Seva Trust. The Petition sought to...

Bombay High Court Directs State To Pass Tribe Claim Within Two Weeks, Refuses To Intervene on Merits of Claim Itself

The Division Bench of Bombay High Court consisting of Justice S.S. Shinde and Madhav Jayajirao Jamdar passed an order...

Kerala High Court Dismisses Petition by Allocating Respondent To Vacancy in IFS Cadre

On 16th November 2020, the Division Bench at Kerala High Court, consisting of Honourable Justice A.M. Shaffique and Honourable...

AP High Court: If an Auction Is Conducted by a Cooperative Bank, the Property Ceases to be Property of the State

A single-judge bench consisting of honourable justice Ninala Jayasurya gave orders on the writ petition filed by the petitioner....

Follow us

A Full Bench of the Supreme Court was headed by Chief Justice S.A Bobde. It was stated that the telecom service providers are under the obligation to furnish details of the tariffs offered to the TRAI.

Brief facts of the case

The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (‘TRAI’), the Appellant requested the Telecom Service Providers (TSPs) to provide information relating to segmented offers and concessions. But the TSPs failed to disclose the information.

So it applied for an interim direction to the Respondents to disclose information about its segmented offers.

Appellant’s Arguments

The details of the segmented offers provided by TSPs are not disclosed to the TRAI despite being a regulator. Thus, it is not in a position to analyze whether the plans are transparent and non-discriminatory. The TRAI in the absence of such information cannot check whether predatory pricing is resorted to by TSPs in the garb of segmented offers or not.

It was contended that the TSPs are under a statutory obligation to offer tariffs in a transparent, non-discriminatory manner and to report all tariffs to the authority.

Respondent’s Arguments

Segmented offers constitute “confidentially designed trade practices”. The Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal had held that it does not need to be reported. 

The Respondents have complied with the order of the Tribunal to disclose only the number of segmented offers to their existing customers along with a declaration that the principles of nondiscrimination were followed.

Also, if the TRAI receives any complaints about the said offers the Respondents are willing to submit the required details. But, so far the TRAI has not received any complaint.

Court’s Observations

The Court stated that the TRAI has the jurisdiction to demand the Tariff details from the TSPs.

The 63rd amendment to the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 amended the definition of Reporting Requirement. It makes it clear that the Reporting Requirement is for the information and record of the TRAI.

The TRAI is required to ensure adherence to the regulatory principles of transparency, non-discrimination, and non-predation. This cannot be said to be either illegal or wholly unjustified.

Court’s Decision

The Court ordered the TSPs (Airtel, Idea, and Vodafone) to disclose information about the Tariff offers. It also stated the duty of the TRAI to keep the information confidential.

Click here to view full judgment.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgment from courts. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Madras HC Reaffirms Trial Court’s Decree in Case of Thimmaraya & Ors. V. Gowrammal

A Civil Revision Petition was filed by three petitioners against the dismissal of their application on the file of the Sub-Judge, Hosur. The case...

Delhi High Court Disposes Ashok Arora’s Appeal Against Suspension From Supreme Court Bar Association

In the present Petition, Senior Advocate Ashok Arora challenged an Order passed by a Single Judge bench. The Order held that Mr Arora had...

Allahabad High Court Dismisses Application To Quash Prima Facie Allegations of Criminal Intimidation and Outraging Modesty

Allahabad High Court, on 17th November 2020, dismissed an application filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. and refused to quash the charge sheet (dated...

Delhi High Court Prohibits Gathering in Public Places To Celebrate Chhat Puja

The Order had come in a Writ Petition moved by Shri Durga Jan Seva Trust. The Petition sought to quash and set aside an...

Bombay High Court Directs State To Pass Tribe Claim Within Two Weeks, Refuses To Intervene on Merits of Claim Itself

The Division Bench of Bombay High Court consisting of Justice S.S. Shinde and Madhav Jayajirao Jamdar passed an order on 17th November 2020 in...

Kerala High Court Dismisses Petition by Allocating Respondent To Vacancy in IFS Cadre

On 16th November 2020, the Division Bench at Kerala High Court, consisting of Honourable Justice A.M. Shaffique and Honourable Justice Gopinath. P heard the...

AP High Court: If an Auction Is Conducted by a Cooperative Bank, the Property Ceases to be Property of the State

A single-judge bench consisting of honourable justice Ninala Jayasurya gave orders on the writ petition filed by the petitioner. The petition challenges the action...

Madras HC Rules in Favour of the Authorities in FMGE Examination, Finds Writ Petitions Against the Exam Void of Merit

Three aspirants of Foreign Medical Examinations moved to the High Court by filing a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution. They...

Hong Kong High Court Rules for Independent Mechanisms To Be Set up To Deal With Complaints Against Police Officers

The present suit was brought by a journalist association because of the police brutality that the protestors faced in the protests against the China...

Madras High Court Maintains That Government Policy Is To Prioritize Own State’s Candidates and Sets Aside Nativity Certificate Rejection Order

Varsha Totagi, a NEET aspirant filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution. She had been denied Nativity Certificate without which...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -