U.S. Supreme Court Holds Foreign Affiliates Do Not Have First Amendment Rights

Must Read

Police To Decide on the Entry of Farmers To Delhi on Republic Day Says Supreme Court

While the Supreme Court heard a plea seeking an injunction against the tractor rally that is scheduled for January 26th, it held that it is the decision of the Delhi Police officers to see whether the protesting farmers should get entry into Delhi on Republic Day.

[Sushant Singh Rajput Case]: Republic TV & Times Now Hindered Investigation Probe Says Bombay HC

In November last year, the Court had reserved its judgement on the PILs that came from 8 former police officers from Maharashtra, lawyers, activists and NGOs, seeking restraining orders against the media trial in the Sushant Singh Rajput case.

Women Advocates Move To Supreme Court Against the Delhi HC Orders on Resuming Physical Hearing

Another writ petition has been filed by women advocates in the Supreme Court against the decision of the Delhi HC of directing the expansion of physical hearing of cases within the National Capital Territory of Delhi without giving an option to litigants to be represented by their lawyers virtually.

Gujarat High Court Allows Report Filed by Official Liquidator for Dissolution of the Company

The present report had been filed by the Official Liquidator for the dissolution of M/s AtRo Limited under the...

[WhatsApp Privacy Policy Row] It’s a Private App, Don’t Use It; Says Delhi High Court

On Monday, while hearing a petition regarding the privacy policy of WhatsApp, the Delhi High Court said, “It is a private app. Don't join it. It is a voluntary thing, don't accept it. Use some other app.”

Madras High Court Asks the State To Reconsider Number of Seats Allotted for Bcm Category

Mr. Shakkiya filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution to issue a Writ of Mandamus....

Follow us

The Supreme Court, in a 5-3 decision, held that specific requirements for the foreign affiliates of American NGOs to be funded are valid. The United States Leadership Against HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria Act, has a provision which states that organizations need to have a policy explicitly opposing prostitution and sex trafficking to receive government funds to fight the HIV/AIDS.

Background

Congress passed the United States Leadership Against HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria Act in 2003. This law has funded billions of dollars to the effort of fighting HIV/AIDS abroad. This program has helped millions in African countries. It has been viewed as the most successful program. Seven years ago, the Supreme Court held that the organizations based in The USA need not have a policy explicitly opposing prostitution and sex trafficking to receive governmental funds. The funding policy was held to violate the First Amendment Right. The present case was in order to receive the same status for foreign affiliates. Four U.S. based NGOs turned to the Court in order to stop enforcement of this policy for the foreign affiliates.

Arguments

The argument was that this policy violates the First Amendment Rights of foreign affiliates. The four NGOs argued that they are closely affiliated with these foreign organizations. Any policy that the foreign organizations are bound by would bind them too. This is the result even if the two organizations might be legally different entities. The plaintiffs also had a view about the prostitution stance taken by the policy. They have expressed that they do not want to agree to the American commitment to the eradication of prostitution. Their argument aims for a more neutral stance on the prostitution aspect. This will help in the global approach in efforts to prevent HIV/AIDS. The respondent’s argued that foreign organizations could not have any rights under the U.S. Constitution when they are operating abroad. This would be fundamentally against the principles of the constitution.

Court’s Opinion

Justice Kavanaugh gave the decision for the majority. Thus, the Supreme Court reversed the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals, which took the side of the NGOs. Furthermore, the opinion stated that there were two main principles in action. Foreign citizens who are outside the United States cannot have constitutional rights. The second principle is that the separate legal entities have distinct legal rights and duties. Hence, these two principles play a pivotal role in the case. Therefore, Kavanaugh held that the foreign organizations which operate abroad could not possess First Amendment Rights.

The concurring decision by Justice Thomas stated that there is no violation of any right in the first place. In addition to that, the First Amendment Right has not been violated as this policy does not compel anyone to say anything. The dissent was lead by Justice Breyer and joined by Justice Ruth and Sotomayor. Their primary opinion was concerning the First Amendment right violation. The dissent stated that the violation of this right is of the American organizations and not the foreign affiliates.

Court’s Decision

The Court held that foreign organizations do not possess First Amendment rights. They can be subject to the policy under the Act. This will not be unconstitutional.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

 

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Police To Decide on the Entry of Farmers To Delhi on Republic Day Says Supreme Court

While the Supreme Court heard a plea seeking an injunction against the tractor rally that is scheduled for January 26th, it held that it is the decision of the Delhi Police officers to see whether the protesting farmers should get entry into Delhi on Republic Day.

[Sushant Singh Rajput Case]: Republic TV & Times Now Hindered Investigation Probe Says Bombay HC

In November last year, the Court had reserved its judgement on the PILs that came from 8 former police officers from Maharashtra, lawyers, activists and NGOs, seeking restraining orders against the media trial in the Sushant Singh Rajput case.

Women Advocates Move To Supreme Court Against the Delhi HC Orders on Resuming Physical Hearing

Another writ petition has been filed by women advocates in the Supreme Court against the decision of the Delhi HC of directing the expansion of physical hearing of cases within the National Capital Territory of Delhi without giving an option to litigants to be represented by their lawyers virtually.

Gujarat High Court Allows Report Filed by Official Liquidator for Dissolution of the Company

The present report had been filed by the Official Liquidator for the dissolution of M/s AtRo Limited under the provisions of Section 497 (6)...

[WhatsApp Privacy Policy Row] It’s a Private App, Don’t Use It; Says Delhi High Court

On Monday, while hearing a petition regarding the privacy policy of WhatsApp, the Delhi High Court said, “It is a private app. Don't join it. It is a voluntary thing, don't accept it. Use some other app.”

Madras High Court Asks the State To Reconsider Number of Seats Allotted for Bcm Category

Mr. Shakkiya filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution to issue a Writ of Mandamus. The petition sought to direct...

Gujarat High Court Directs To Register Name of Petitioners in the Society Records as Owners of Property, as per Will

A single-judge bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Justice Biren Vaishnav, because probate wasn’t necessary and that the petitioners were entitled to...

If No Complaint Is Filed, No Further Orders Are Required To Be Passed: Telangana High Court

Excerpt In Matlakunta Sundaramma vs The State Of Telangana, on January 8, 2021, the Telangana High Court decided that there is no requirement of passing...

Gujarat High Court Allows Report Filed by Official Liquidator for Dissolution of the Company

The present report had been filed by the Official Liquidator for the dissolution of M/s AtRo Limited under the provisions of Section 497 (6)...

Parents of Road Accident Victim Entitled To Compensation: Delhi High Court

Justice JR Midha said, “Even if parents are not dependent on their children at the time of an accident, they will certainly be dependent, both financially and emotionally, upon them at the later stage of their life, as the children were dependent upon their parents in their initial years.”

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -