TDSAT rules No Sum Should Be Paid After The Expiry Of Agreement, Sony Pictures Loses Claim

Must Read

Himachal Pradesh High Court Supports Promotion Based on Seniority of Post Rather Based on the Eligibility Test

In the case of Ramesh Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, the petitioner, reached the court as...

NCDRC Dismisses PIL against Urologist, Holy Family Hospital, Says Mode Of Treatment Or Skill Differs From Doctor To Doctor

The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a petition against Holy Family Hospital and a Urologist, alleging negligence...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Disposes Suit for Possession and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction Due To Mutual Consent

In the case of Parveen Kumar vs Smt. Vijay Laxmi and Ors, the Petitioner, Parveen had filed a suit for declaration,...

Supreme Court Appoints Committee To Examine Arbitrariness of Sealing of Resorts in Elephant Corridor, Tamil Nadu

A Full Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, in the matter of Hospitality Association of Mudumalai V. In...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules That Export Ban on N95 Masks & PPE Kits Does Not Violate Fundamental Right of Traders

The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that the formulation and regulation of trade policies were within the subjects of...

Delhi High Court Issues Notice To Two Pleas Filed Praying for Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage

The Court heard two writ petitions which urged that the Special Marriage Act and the Foreign Marriage Act be...

Follow us

The Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT), New Delhi in the case of Sony Pictures Network India Ltd. v. Moon IT services Pvt. Ltd. stated that no one is liable to pay the money once the term of the agreement expires.

Petitioner: Sony Pictures Networks India Pvt. Ltd.

Respondents: Moon IT Services Pvt. Ltd.

Judge: Mr Shiva Kirti Singh

Decided On: 22 October 2019

Facts of the Dispute

Moon IT Services Pvt. Ltd, a private limited company and an authorized agent of Sony Pictures Networks India Pvt. Ltd. (SPN) and TV Today (TVT which entered into an agreement with the respondent MSO for distribution of signals of some TV channels belonging to petitioner broadcaster for the period 1.4.2014 to 31.12.2014 with monthly subscription fee of Rs.79,838 /-for the SPN channels and Rs.1,629/- for the TVT channels including taxes. After making regular payments for a few months the respondent stopped making the payment from September onwards. Therefore, the petitioner discontinued the service on 16.2.2015 i.e. two months later of expiry of agreement and claimed Rs.71,22,383/- with an interest of 18% p.a. as the dues recoverable from the respondent on accounts for both sets of channels.

Decision of TDSAT

The court stated that seeing the irresponsible behaviour and the aforesaid circumstances, the claim of the petitioner for Rs. 71,22,383.00 including interest rates should have been allowed but the agreement between the parties was valid till 31.12.2014 whereas petitioner has raised invoices and charged the respondent for the period till 16.2.2015. the court following the judgement of UCN cable stated that the petitioner’s claim must be confined to the period covered by the affiliation agreement.

A decree for Rs. 4,67,288/- (Rupees four lakhs sixty-seven thousand two hundred and eighty-eight) was given in favour of the petitioner and against the respondent is passed along with interest, but only at the rate of 8% per annum which has been allowed in a large number of similar cases. The interest shall be payable on the aforesaid rate from May 2016 till the date of realization.

The respondent is directed to pay the amount as per this order within six weeks failing which the petitioner will be entitled to realize the entire amount through execution application.

[googlepdf url=”http://libertatem.in/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Sony-Pictures-v-Moon-IT-TDSAT.pdf” download=”Download PDF” width=”100%” height=”900″]


Contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now. You can also join our Team of Courtroom and regularly contribute cases like the above one.

For more Courtroom Updates, check out our Courtroom Page

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Himachal Pradesh High Court Supports Promotion Based on Seniority of Post Rather Based on the Eligibility Test

In the case of Ramesh Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, the petitioner, reached the court as he was aggrieved by the...

NCDRC Dismisses PIL against Urologist, Holy Family Hospital, Says Mode Of Treatment Or Skill Differs From Doctor To Doctor

The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a petition against Holy Family Hospital and a Urologist, alleging negligence in diagnosing the septicemia and...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Disposes Suit for Possession and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction Due To Mutual Consent

In the case of Parveen Kumar vs Smt. Vijay Laxmi and Ors, the Petitioner, Parveen had filed a suit for declaration, possession and a permanent prohibitory...

Supreme Court Appoints Committee To Examine Arbitrariness of Sealing of Resorts in Elephant Corridor, Tamil Nadu

A Full Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, in the matter of Hospitality Association of Mudumalai V. In Defence of Environment and Animals...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules That Export Ban on N95 Masks & PPE Kits Does Not Violate Fundamental Right of Traders

The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that the formulation and regulation of trade policies were within the subjects of the Central Government. Any reasonable...

Delhi High Court Issues Notice To Two Pleas Filed Praying for Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage

The Court heard two writ petitions which urged that the Special Marriage Act and the Foreign Marriage Act be interpreted to also apply to...

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Challenging Allahabad High Court Order Granting Interim Bail on Medical Grounds

An appeal was filed before the Supreme Court, challenging the Judgment & Order of the Allahabad High Court in the matter of State of U.P...

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Seeking Lawyers and Legal Clerks To Travel in Local Trains

The present hearing arose out of a batch of Public Interest Litigations that was filed in the Bombay High Court to permit the members...

Provisions for Retirement of Teachers Must Be Read With the Larger Interest of Students in Mind: Supreme Court

Supreme Court in Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal v State of Uttarakhand reinstated the appellants to their position as Professor on basis of re-employment till the...

Parties Cannot Deny Specific Performance Merely Due To Delay: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court, in Ferrodous Estate v P Gopirathnam, revisited the law on the specific performance of a contract. It reiterated that mere delay...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -