Supreme Courts declares fixing minimum standards for re-inspection of medical colleges is not illegal

Must Read

SC: Under-21 Convicts Can Be Given Less Than Minimum Sentence, Resorts To Probation of Offenders Act

The Supreme Court resorted to the Probation of Offenders Act to sidestep the mandate under Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code that mentions a sentence of not less than 7 years to those convicted of armed robbery, to give a chance to two young convicts to reform their lives.

Environment Protection Act Passed at the Instance of Foreign Powers: NHAI in Karnataka HC

The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) claimed in a submission that the Environment Protection Act 1986 was passed not only for the protection of the environment by the parliament but also at the instance of foreign powers. This statement was made while referring to a UN conference and got the NHAI into great trouble in the Karnataka High Court.

Delhi High Court To Implement a Hybrid System Through Virtual and Physical Hearing

On Friday the Delhi High Court said that they have initiated steps to implement a mode wherein hearing can be done by virtual as well as physical mode. The Delhi High Court is aiming to implement the Hybrid mode. It stated that when the particular bench is conducting a virtual hearing the lawyer may opt for this mode after giving prior intimation about the same.

Mercy Plea of Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Case To Be Decided in Four Weeks, TN Governor To Supreme Court

Tamil Nadu Governor Banwarilal Purohit on Thursday told the Supreme Court that a decision on the mercy petition of one of the convicts serving a life sentence for the assassination of former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, AG Perarivalan will be taken within four weeks. The petition has been pending with the Governor since December 30, 2015.

Bombay High Court Questions FIR Over Journalist Alleged of Communist Comment on WhatsApp

An FIR lodged against the editor of Marathi newspaper, Rajkumar Chhajed has been questioned by the Bombay High Court. The Maharashtra Police has accused Chhajed of creating a rift between the two communities based on a WhatsApp message.

Allahabad High Court Expresses Dissatisfaction on Counsels Seeking Unnecessary Adjournments

The petition had been filed by Smt. Radha prayed to issue directions to Judicial Magistrate-I in Faizabad. The petition...

Follow us

The Supreme Court has set aside the verdict of Bombay High Court and explained that the lower court’s interpretation of the law regarding fixing minimum standards for re-inspection of medical colleges is incorrect and misinformed. In its judgment on June 1, 2018, the top court remarked: “the interpretation  of  Regulation  8(3)(1) (a) by the High Court is patently erroneous.

Facts of the case

Vedantaa Institute of Academic Excellence was given permission by the Central government to start a Medical College under Section 10A of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956. A batch of 150 students was admitted for the academic year 2017-2018 and Vedantaa Institute applied to Medical Council of India (MCI) for inspection for the permission of granting first renewal for admission of students for the academic year 2018-2019. The said inspection carried out on 25.09.2017 and 26.09.2017 when the Council found there were a severe deficiency of facilities, lack of basic infrastructure and inadequate management.

MCI then recommended the Government to invoke Regulation 8(3)(1) (a) of the Establishment of Medical College Regulations, 1999 and disapprove the application of Vedantaa Institute of Medical Sciences. Vedantaa Institute moved to Bombay High Court against the recommendations of Medical Council of India (MCI) claiming that the inspection was not properly done and Regulation 8(3)(1) (a) is not applicable for the Vedantaa Institute of Medical Sciences since they are applying for their first renewal only. Bombay High Court accepted the contention of the Vedantaa Institute of Medical Sciences and directed MCI to re-inspect the Institute recommending that Vedantaa Institute is given a chance to fix its problems.

Court ruling

Medical Council of India (MCI) filed an appeal with the Apex Court against the High Court’s order through Senior Counsel Vikas Singh who denied there was any merit to the objections raised by Vedantaa Institute. A Division Bench comprising of Justices L. Nageswara Rao and Mohan M. Shantanagoudar presided over the case and found that there was a gross misinterpretation of the law by the lower court in this case. The Court agreed with the appellant’s Advocate and observed: “there is no ambiguity in the language of the Regulation 8(3)(1) (a), as it covers colleges up to second renewal.”

The Apex Court stated “Regulation 8(3)(1) (a) is complementary to Section 10A of the Act. Fixing minimum standards which have to be fulfilled for the purpose of enabling a medical College to seek fresh inspection would not be contrary to the scheme of Section 10A. In fact, Regulation 8(3)(1) provides that an opportunity shall be given to the Medical College to rectify the defects. But, the proviso contemplates that certain minimum standards are to be satisfied i.e. there should not be the deficiency of teaching faculty and/or residents more than 30 per cent and/or bed occupancy 12 should not be less than 50 per cent. This prescription of standards for availing an opportunity to seek re-inspection is not ultra vires either the Regulation or Section 10A of the Act.”

Impact of the judgment

The Supreme Court in its judgment has emphatically denounced that it is ill-advised to try to “fix” the provisions of Regulation 8(3)(1) (a) as that would set a dangerous precedent. The Apex Court relying on its earlier judgment in Medical Council of India v. Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences (KIMS) & Ors. (2016) 11 SCC 530 reiterated that “any leniency shown by this Court in providing an opportunity to such Institutions to rectify the defects will have a cascading effect in the succeeding years and would result in Colleges continuing to function with deficiencies as well as producing half-baked and poor quality doctors.”

The Supreme Court placed their reliance on the Medical Council of India’s expertise stating “when an expert body certifies that the facilities in a medical college are inadequate, it is not for the courts to interfere with the assessment of the MCI, except for very cogent jurisdictional reasons such as mala fides of the inspection team, ex facie perversity in the inspection, jurisdictional error on the part of the MCI etc.”

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

SC: Under-21 Convicts Can Be Given Less Than Minimum Sentence, Resorts To Probation of Offenders Act

The Supreme Court resorted to the Probation of Offenders Act to sidestep the mandate under Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code that mentions a sentence of not less than 7 years to those convicted of armed robbery, to give a chance to two young convicts to reform their lives.

Environment Protection Act Passed at the Instance of Foreign Powers: NHAI in Karnataka HC

The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) claimed in a submission that the Environment Protection Act 1986 was passed not only for the protection of the environment by the parliament but also at the instance of foreign powers. This statement was made while referring to a UN conference and got the NHAI into great trouble in the Karnataka High Court.

Delhi High Court To Implement a Hybrid System Through Virtual and Physical Hearing

On Friday the Delhi High Court said that they have initiated steps to implement a mode wherein hearing can be done by virtual as well as physical mode. The Delhi High Court is aiming to implement the Hybrid mode. It stated that when the particular bench is conducting a virtual hearing the lawyer may opt for this mode after giving prior intimation about the same.

Mercy Plea of Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Case To Be Decided in Four Weeks, TN Governor To Supreme Court

Tamil Nadu Governor Banwarilal Purohit on Thursday told the Supreme Court that a decision on the mercy petition of one of the convicts serving a life sentence for the assassination of former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, AG Perarivalan will be taken within four weeks. The petition has been pending with the Governor since December 30, 2015.

Bombay High Court Questions FIR Over Journalist Alleged of Communist Comment on WhatsApp

An FIR lodged against the editor of Marathi newspaper, Rajkumar Chhajed has been questioned by the Bombay High Court. The Maharashtra Police has accused Chhajed of creating a rift between the two communities based on a WhatsApp message.

Allahabad High Court Expresses Dissatisfaction on Counsels Seeking Unnecessary Adjournments

The petition had been filed by Smt. Radha prayed to issue directions to Judicial Magistrate-I in Faizabad. The petition sought a speedy decision in...

[Delhi Riots] When the IT Ministry Calls Us, We Will Go Says Harish Salve To Delhi High Court

The Vice President and Managing Director of Facebook, Ajit Mohan told the Supreme Court that when the representatives of the company are called by the Information Technology Ministry they will come and record their statements.

Allahabad High Court Seeks Response on Compensation of Cutting Trees From National Highways Authority of India (Nhai) 

The Order had come in the form of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by a bunch of law students in Uttar Pradesh. The...

Doctrine of Proportionality Must Adhere to Reasonableness Principal Test: Madras High Court

Young Men's Christian Association built a commercial complex and leased it without having due permission. The District Collector & Tahsildar issued a show-cause notice...

Delhi High Court Refuses To Stay Release of ‘The White Tiger’ on the OTT Platform Netflix

A plea requesting a stay on the release of the film ‘The White Tiger’ by the American producer, John Hart Jr. alleging copyright violation was rejected by the Delhi High Court on Thursday.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -