89% of the cases pending trial under POCSO Act

Must Read

US Court Orders Iran To Pay $1.4 BN in Damages To Missing Former FBI Agent’s Family

The United States District Court for the District of Columbia ordered Iran to pay in total $1.45 bn to...

Onus on Petitioner To Show Unassailable Facts: Delhi High Court

In the case of Rhythm Jain v National Testing Agency, the Delhi High Court mentioned that in such petitions the...

Under-Trial/Convicted Persons Do Not Have Absolute Right To Parole in Light of Coronavirus : Bombay High Court

An important judgment was given by the Division Bench of the Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court concerning the...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Asks State To File Reply To Examine Whether Privacy Rights of an Individual Can Be Violated by Issuing an Executive...

A Writ Petition was instituted by an individual for violation of his fundamental rights by the State before the...

Bombay High Court Allows Export of Pending Consignment of Onions in Respect of Which Shipping Bills Have Been Generated Before Notification of the Ban

A writ petition challenging the notification dated 14th September 2020 to ban the export of onions was filed by...

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding...

Follow us

Supreme Court on Monday, March 12, asked for the Registrar Generals of the High Courts across the country to investigate the delay in trial of the cases under the Prevention of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. A plea filed by advocate Alakh Alok Srivastava stated that about 89% of cases under POCSO are still pending judgment.

The recent case of an eight-month-old baby left in the custody of her relatives while her parents were out and who was brutally raped by her 28 year old cousin under the influence of alcohol highlighted the plight of child rape victims who are still waiting for the verdicts on their respective cases. Currently she is being receiving treatment at AIIMS, New Delhi and on the direction of the Apex Court, two doctors who had visited her at the hospital informed the Court of her progress.

The Delhi Legal Services Authority (DLSA) also reported to the Supreme Court that the accused is in judicial custody and an interim compensation to the tune of Rs 75,000 have been paid to the victim’s family. The three judge Division Bench comprising of the Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices A M Khanwilkar and D Y Chandrachud expressed their concern about the amount of child sexual assault cases pending under various courts of this country.

Advocate Srivastava drew attention to the 2016 data of National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) which shows only 1100 cases have been disposed of out of 1,01,326 cases in that year, which is but 11% of the total cases registered under different trial courts of this country. A whopping 89% of the cases are yet to be heard by the courts. The petitioner lawyer further reiterated that the Supreme Court set some guidelines that rape cases involving children under 12 years of age should be resolved within six months from the day of lodging of the FIR. Although Advocate Srivastava proscribed death penalty in child rape cases the Centre disagreed with his view, stating that such actions would not bring a fruitful result to combat child sexual offences, instead cases should be judged on their individual merits.

Supreme Court has heard the plea and directed the High Courts of the country under the authority of the Chief Justices of the High Courts to collect and submit the latest data on all the cases pending under POCSO Act and report the same to the Supreme Court Registry within the next four weeks so that a comprehensive and specific plan could be put forth for speedy trial of the said cases in special courts under the Act.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

US Court Orders Iran To Pay $1.4 BN in Damages To Missing Former FBI Agent’s Family

The United States District Court for the District of Columbia ordered Iran to pay in total $1.45 bn to the Levinson family in punitive...

Onus on Petitioner To Show Unassailable Facts: Delhi High Court

In the case of Rhythm Jain v National Testing Agency, the Delhi High Court mentioned that in such petitions the onus to prove the facts...

Under-Trial/Convicted Persons Do Not Have Absolute Right To Parole in Light of Coronavirus : Bombay High Court

An important judgment was given by the Division Bench of the Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court concerning the constitutionality of Rule 19 of...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Asks State To File Reply To Examine Whether Privacy Rights of an Individual Can Be Violated by Issuing an Executive...

A Writ Petition was instituted by an individual for violation of his fundamental rights by the State before the Madhya Pradesh High Court. The...

Bombay High Court Allows Export of Pending Consignment of Onions in Respect of Which Shipping Bills Have Been Generated Before Notification of the Ban

A writ petition challenging the notification dated 14th September 2020 to ban the export of onions was filed by the Exporters Association before the...

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding that mens rea is an...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @ Balli v State. The bench...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up testing facilities in Delhi.   Facts of...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has set aside the 24.07.2019 Order...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an order restraining the manufacturing, marketing,...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -