Supreme Court to Constitute Expert Team for Inspection in States and UT’s To Monitor the Services Provided to COVID-19 Patients

Must Read

Madras High Court Observes Unexplained Delay in Procedural Safeguards, Quashes Detention Through Writ Petition

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus. The petitioner P. Lakshmi,...

UK Court of Appeal Rules Home Department’s Deportation Policy of Immigrants Unlawful

Britain’s Court of Appeal quashed the Home Department’s deportation policy, declaring it unlawful; criticizing it for being too stringent...

Inordinate and Unexplained Delay in Considering Representation by Government Renders Detention Order Illegal: Madras High Court

A Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution was filed in the Madras High Court to declare the detention...

Privy Council Clarifies Approach To Winding up in “Deadlock” Cases in the Case of Chu v. Lau

The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council clarified several aspects of the law concerning just and equitable winding-up petitions,...

Madras High Court Directs Hospital To Submit Necessary Medical Reports to Authorization Committee for Approval of Kidney Transplant

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a Writ of Mandamus to K.G. Hospital, Coimbatore by...

Punjab Woman Evokes Petition for Protection Fearing Honour Killing

In the case of Divya Mattu and another vs State of Punjab and others, the petitioner, Divya, fearing honour...

Follow us

The Supreme Court on Friday directed the Centre and States to set up an expert panel. A panel for effective monitoring, supervision, and guidance of the government, so as to provide the patients with proper health and care.

The Apex Court also directed the Union government to bring uniformity in charges of testing and other facilities. The Court ordered it to constitute an expert committee of senior doctors.

Brief Background

A bench of Justices Ashok Bhushan, S K Kaul, and M R Shah took up the matter for hearing through video conferencing.

They issued a slew of directions in the case taking Suo moto cognizance of the lapses and faults on the proper treatment of COVID-19 patients and dignified handling of dead bodies in the hospitals.

The Directions Issued

1) Monitoring of Government Hospitals Dedicated to COVID-19 Care (Especially in Delhi)

It said that the expert committee must inspect, supervise, and issue necessary directions to all hospitals in NCT of Delhi. Taking care of COVID patients and the panel must ensure atleast one visit in each hospital every week.

The Court said that, “The team must also conduct surprise visits to assess the preparedness of the hospitals. The expert team after visiting may issue necessary instructions for improvement to the hospital and forward its report to the Government of NCT of Delhi and the Union of India, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare.”

Furthermore, “All States must also constitute an expert team of doctors for inspection, supervision, and guidance of hospitals. They must issue the necessary directions for the improvement to the concerned hospital and report to the Government.”

“Chief Secretary of each State must ensure that such Committees are immediately constituted. They should start their work within seven days.”

2) Installations of CCTV Cameras

The Court welcomed the steps taken by LNJP hospital about the installation of CCTV cameras in all the wards. The Court said it would help the hospital management to find out the need for proper care about patients admitted in the wards. It would also ensure transparency in the patient’s care in the hospital.

Footage from the CCTV Cameras must be available by the hospitals in NCT of Delhi to the inspecting/supervising expert team or any other authority or body as per directions of the Union of India, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Thus, for proper screening of the footage it is necessary to issue directions for it.

The Court also said, “The Chief Secretaries of other States must also take steps about the installation of CCTV Cameras in COVID-19 hospitals.”

3) Attendants to be Present with COVID-19 Patients

All COVID-19 hospitals must permit one attendant of the patient in the hospital. All COVID-19 hospitals to set up a help desk for telephonic inquiry about the admitted patients.

4) Discharge Policy

The Apex Court has inscribed the Centre’s discharge policy and this be must followed by all the States and UT’s. The Centre must prescribe the reasonable rates for all the COVID related facilities and tests.

5) Daily Tests being conducted

The bench also noted Maharashtra Government’s submission that 1600 tests were conducted across the state daily. The Court also noted NCT Delhi’s submission that by July 20, daily tests increased to 18,000.

6) Maharashtra’s Policy of not giving the Report of COVID- 19 Positive Patients to Relatives

The bench took note of a circular released by the Maharashtra Government. The circular was about the non-giving of reports of COVID-19 test patients and/or their relatives. Thus, the Court observed that restrictions imposed by the State Government should be done away with.

The counsel for the State of Maharashtra also stated and advised the Government to review the circular and to ensure that families would permit to get the reports. The Court said that, “We do not doubt that the States and all concerned must supply a copy of the report of the patient to him or his relatives and the hospital”.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News,InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Madras High Court Observes Unexplained Delay in Procedural Safeguards, Quashes Detention Through Writ Petition

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus. The petitioner P. Lakshmi, called for records of the...

UK Court of Appeal Rules Home Department’s Deportation Policy of Immigrants Unlawful

Britain’s Court of Appeal quashed the Home Department’s deportation policy, declaring it unlawful; criticizing it for being too stringent on immigrants to comply with. Background The...

Inordinate and Unexplained Delay in Considering Representation by Government Renders Detention Order Illegal: Madras High Court

A Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution was filed in the Madras High Court to declare the detention order of the husband of...

Privy Council Clarifies Approach To Winding up in “Deadlock” Cases in the Case of Chu v. Lau

The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council clarified several aspects of the law concerning just and equitable winding-up petitions, as well as shareholder disputes...

Madras High Court Directs Hospital To Submit Necessary Medical Reports to Authorization Committee for Approval of Kidney Transplant

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a Writ of Mandamus to K.G. Hospital, Coimbatore by P. Sankar & V. Sobana....

Punjab Woman Evokes Petition for Protection Fearing Honour Killing

In the case of Divya Mattu and another vs State of Punjab and others, the petitioner, Divya, fearing honour killing against her by her...

Punjab Woman Accuses Punjab Police of Keeping Husband in Illegal Custody and Framing Him in a False Case

In the case of Geeta v the State of Punjab, the petitioner evoked a writ petition of habeas corpus as she claimed that her...

Addition of Words as Prefixes or Suffixes Is an Infringement of a Registered Trademark: Delhi High Court

Justice Jayanth Nath allowed the Times Group to use its registered trademark “Newshour”, in the case of Bennett Coleman and Co. Ltd v. ARG Outlier...

Just Because the Deceased Did Not Have License, Does Not Imply He Was Negligent: Chhattisgarh High Court

In the case of Hemlal & Others v. Dayaram & Others, a Single Bench of Chhattisgarh High Court consisting of Justice Sanjay S. Agrawal annunciated various...

Hoardings Are Movable Property Under Section 2(3) of DMC Act Subject To the Twin Test: Delhi High Court

Delhi High Court in the case of Delhi International Airport v South Delhi Metropolitan Corporation discussed in detail the provision under Section 2(3) of the DMC...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -