Supreme Court tells ICAI to Allow Students to Opt-Out even During Exams

Must Read

Calcutta High Court Rejects the Petition Challenging the Bid’s Rejection Filed on Seeking Condonation of Delay Due to Pandemic Interventions in Absence of Satisfactory...

Case: Shiba Prosad Banerjee vs The State of West Bengal and others The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of Calcutta...

Calcutta High Court Reiterated the Scope of the Grounds for Exercising Its Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction.

Case: Shreya Beria vs Vedant Bhagat The Calcutta HC on 20th January 2021, dismissed the criminal revision filed by...

Gujarat High Court Allows a Family Suit to Be Transferred From Family Court, Surat to the Family Court, Bhavnagar

The Court directed that in light of the circumstances of the present case, the application of the applicant- wife...

Telangana HC Grants Two Days to Convey the Decision of Appropriate Notification and Counselling to the Higher Secondary Department

Excerpt In Telangana Republican Party Trp vs The State Of Telangana, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed the...

Telangana HC: Applications Have to Be Made Through Online Web Portal “Dharani” for Mutation of Names

Excerpt In P. Manohar Reddy vs The State Of Telangana And 3 Others, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court...

Follow us

The SC observed that the ICAI should consider allowing the students to opt-out of the exams until the last day (Anubha Shrivasta Sahai v. ICAI).

Facts of the case

The CA exams for the cycle of May 2020 were scheduled between July 29th and August 16th. ICAI issued a notification about the “opt-out” option. The petitioner requested the Court to quash the notifications of the opt-out option. The petition also seeks directions from the SC to notify more exam centres. Further, it seeks direction for free accommodation for students living far away.

Petitioner’s Arguments

Advocate Alakh Alok Srivastava represented the petitioner. He stated that the number of students scheduled to appear figure stands at around 3.46 lakh, as opposed to over 4.5 lakh. He contended that there are students who live in containment zones, and areas where the lockdown has been extended. 

Furthermore, there are a limited number of exam centres. ICAI said that there are only 232 centres. Many students in Bihar have opted for the 15-day long exam in Kolkata which is under lockdown.

He highlighted three main issues faced by the students:-

1.)  An increase in the number of exam centres,

2.) Candidates in places under extended lockdown and

3.) How the CBSE model can be implemented in this scenario.

Respondent’s Arguments

Senior Advocate Ramji Srinivasan represented ICAI. He informed that the apprehensions of the petitioner are unfounded about the opt-out option. The ICAI is bound by the CA Act.

ICAI said that there are around 500 centres across the country, sanitized and prepared with hygienic conditions for all the aspirants.

He further stated that a change in the centre is an option kept open for the students and the deadline for changing the same is a thing he would have to seek instructions. ICAI informed the Court that if any exam centre falls in a containment zone, then the student will get accommodated in the closest exam centre or in the November exam cycle.

As per the latest information, around 52,000 students have chosen to opt-out of the exam, and the deadline could be extended by one more week. The Institute has sought time from the Court to issue a new notification regarding the exam.

Court’s Decision

The Bench comprises of Justices AM Khanwilkar, Dinesh Maheshwari, and Sanjiv Khanna. They informed that the Institute needs to be flexible and not rigid towards the exam pattern.

The Court stated that ICAI has to make a provision, i.e., if the student passes the exam in November, it should be noted that they have passed the exam in July.

However, the Court suggested that the deadline needs to be extended until the last day. Any person not appearing must be treated as an opt-out candidate and should be adjusted in the November cycle.

It stated that the ICAI ought to keep in mind the entire protocol as well as the guidelines issued by the MHA.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Calcutta High Court Rejects the Petition Challenging the Bid’s Rejection Filed on Seeking Condonation of Delay Due to Pandemic Interventions in Absence of Satisfactory...

Case: Shiba Prosad Banerjee vs The State of West Bengal and others The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of Calcutta High Court on 22nd January...

Calcutta High Court Reiterated the Scope of the Grounds for Exercising Its Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction.

Case: Shreya Beria vs Vedant Bhagat The Calcutta HC on 20th January 2021, dismissed the criminal revision filed by the Petitioners (wife) challenging the...

Calcutta High Court: Deceased’s Wife Has the Sole Right Over His Preserved Sperm; Father Doesn’t Have Any Fundamental Right Over Son’s Progeny Without the...

Case: Asok Kumar Chatterjee vs. The Union of India & Ors. The Calcutta High Court dismissed the petition by the Petitioner (father) on 19th...

Gujarat High Court Allows a Family Suit to Be Transferred From Family Court, Surat to the Family Court, Bhavnagar

The Court directed that in light of the circumstances of the present case, the application of the applicant- wife to transfer the case from...

Telangana HC Grants Two Days to Convey the Decision of Appropriate Notification and Counselling to the Higher Secondary Department

Excerpt In Telangana Republican Party Trp vs The State Of Telangana, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed the Higher Education Department for passing...

Telangana HC: Applications Have to Be Made Through Online Web Portal “Dharani” for Mutation of Names

Excerpt In P. Manohar Reddy vs The State Of Telangana And 3 Others, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed that one has to...

Indonesian Spa Therapist Approaches Supreme Court Regarding Illegal Detention Followed by Raid at the Spa

An Indonesian spa therapist has moved to Supreme Court, whilst challenging an HC order which provided relief to the police inspector who was involved in the illegal detention of the spa therapist in a woman’s home which was followed by a police raid at the spa.

Questions of Forgery, Tampering Not Capable of Summary Adjudication Under Article 226 in Delhi High Court’s Jee Marks Case

Questions of fraud, forgery, and tampering require elaborate evidence as per the ruling of the Delhi High Court making it incapable of summary adjudication...

Supreme Court: Urgent and Immediate Reforms Needed in the Legal Education Due To Mushrooming of Law Schools

The Supreme Court, on Saturday, said that there is an urgent need for reforming the legal education in the country as its quality is being affected due to the ‘mushrooming’ of Law Colleges.

Delhi High Court Ruled Disclosure of Interest in Information Sought Under Rti Act Necessary to Establish Bonafides of Applicant

The Delhi HC opined that disclosure of the interest of information is necessary for the information sought under the RTI Act for establishing bonafide...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -