Supreme Court tells ICAI to Allow Students to Opt-Out even During Exams

Must Read

Federal Court Denied Involvement of US Department of Justice in Trump’s Defamation Lawsuit

Background  The Plaintiff, E .Jean Carroll, published a book where she wrote that a businessman, Donald J Trump had raped...

SC Stays Order Restraining Physical Campaigns in the Madhya Pradesh Bye-Elections

On the 26th of October, a Bench was set up which comprised Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, and...

Lawsuit Filed Against Uber for Discriminatory “Star Rating System”

The lawsuit was bought in the District Court of North California against Uber. The plaintiff claims class-action status on...

Bombay High Court To Hear Plea Seeking Removal of Chairperson of National Commission for Women

A Writ Petition had been filed in the Bombay High Court challenging the conduct of the Chairperson of the...

Bombay High Court Passes Order To Clarify and Modify Previous Order When State of Maharashtra Moved Praecipe

Division Bench of Bombay High Court consisting of Justice S. V. Gangapurwala and Justice Shrikant D. Kulkarni had passed...

The European Court of Human Rights Orders Germany To Pay Non-Pecuniary Damages for Prison Strip-Searches 

A serving German prisoner was repeatedly stripped searched for non-legitimate purposes. The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) found...

Follow us

The SC observed that the ICAI should consider allowing the students to opt-out of the exams until the last day (Anubha Shrivasta Sahai v. ICAI).

Facts of the case

The CA exams for the cycle of May 2020 were scheduled between July 29th and August 16th. ICAI issued a notification about the “opt-out” option. The petitioner requested the Court to quash the notifications of the opt-out option. The petition also seeks directions from the SC to notify more exam centres. Further, it seeks direction for free accommodation for students living far away.

Petitioner’s Arguments

Advocate Alakh Alok Srivastava represented the petitioner. He stated that the number of students scheduled to appear figure stands at around 3.46 lakh, as opposed to over 4.5 lakh. He contended that there are students who live in containment zones, and areas where the lockdown has been extended. 

Furthermore, there are a limited number of exam centres. ICAI said that there are only 232 centres. Many students in Bihar have opted for the 15-day long exam in Kolkata which is under lockdown.

He highlighted three main issues faced by the students:-

1.)  An increase in the number of exam centres,

2.) Candidates in places under extended lockdown and

3.) How the CBSE model can be implemented in this scenario.

Respondent’s Arguments

Senior Advocate Ramji Srinivasan represented ICAI. He informed that the apprehensions of the petitioner are unfounded about the opt-out option. The ICAI is bound by the CA Act.

ICAI said that there are around 500 centres across the country, sanitized and prepared with hygienic conditions for all the aspirants.

He further stated that a change in the centre is an option kept open for the students and the deadline for changing the same is a thing he would have to seek instructions. ICAI informed the Court that if any exam centre falls in a containment zone, then the student will get accommodated in the closest exam centre or in the November exam cycle.

As per the latest information, around 52,000 students have chosen to opt-out of the exam, and the deadline could be extended by one more week. The Institute has sought time from the Court to issue a new notification regarding the exam.

Court’s Decision

The Bench comprises of Justices AM Khanwilkar, Dinesh Maheshwari, and Sanjiv Khanna. They informed that the Institute needs to be flexible and not rigid towards the exam pattern.

The Court stated that ICAI has to make a provision, i.e., if the student passes the exam in November, it should be noted that they have passed the exam in July.

However, the Court suggested that the deadline needs to be extended until the last day. Any person not appearing must be treated as an opt-out candidate and should be adjusted in the November cycle.

It stated that the ICAI ought to keep in mind the entire protocol as well as the guidelines issued by the MHA.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Federal Court Denied Involvement of US Department of Justice in Trump’s Defamation Lawsuit

Background  The Plaintiff, E .Jean Carroll, published a book where she wrote that a businessman, Donald J Trump had raped her in a dressing room,...

SC Stays Order Restraining Physical Campaigns in the Madhya Pradesh Bye-Elections

On the 26th of October, a Bench was set up which comprised Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, and Justice Sanjiv Khanna. They heard...

Lawsuit Filed Against Uber for Discriminatory “Star Rating System”

The lawsuit was bought in the District Court of North California against Uber. The plaintiff claims class-action status on behalf of all the minority...

Bombay High Court To Hear Plea Seeking Removal of Chairperson of National Commission for Women

A Writ Petition had been filed in the Bombay High Court challenging the conduct of the Chairperson of the National Commission for Women. The...

Bombay High Court Passes Order To Clarify and Modify Previous Order When State of Maharashtra Moved Praecipe

Division Bench of Bombay High Court consisting of Justice S. V. Gangapurwala and Justice Shrikant D. Kulkarni had passed an Order on 25th October...

The European Court of Human Rights Orders Germany To Pay Non-Pecuniary Damages for Prison Strip-Searches 

A serving German prisoner was repeatedly stripped searched for non-legitimate purposes. The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) found that Germany had violated the...

Lack of Independent Witness Doesn’t Vitiate Conviction: Supreme Court

A three-judge Bench of the Supreme Court in Rajesh Dhiman v State of Himachal Pradesh clarified the law in case of lack of independent...

Madras High Court Observes Unexplained Delay in Procedural Safeguards, Quashes Detention Through Writ Petition

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus. The petitioner P. Lakshmi, called for records of the...

UK Court of Appeal Rules Home Department’s Deportation Policy of Immigrants Unlawful

Britain’s Court of Appeal quashed the Home Department’s deportation policy, declaring it unlawful; criticizing it for being too stringent on immigrants to comply with. Background The...

Supreme Court Stays Order Restraining Physical Campaigns in the Madhya Pradesh Bye-Elections

On the 26th of October, a Bench was set up which comprised Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, and Justice Sanjiv Khanna. They heard...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -