Supreme Court Heard 593 Matters and Delivered Verdicts In 215 Cases During COVID-19 Lockdown

Must Read

Doctrine of Proportionality Must Adhere to Reasonableness Principal Test: Madras High Court

Young Men's Christian Association built a commercial complex and leased it without having due permission. The District Collector &...

Delhi High Court Refuses To Stay Release of ‘The White Tiger’ on the OTT Platform Netflix

A plea requesting a stay on the release of the film ‘The White Tiger’ by the American producer, John Hart Jr. alleging copyright violation was rejected by the Delhi High Court on Thursday.

“Anganwadi Centers to Be Reopened Outside the Containment Zones, Which Is to Be Decided by the State”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the reopening of the Anganwadi Centers after they had been closed due to the lockdown being...

“Credit Facilities Being Granted by the Primary Agricultural Credit Society to the Non-Members Is No Longer Illegal”: Supreme Court

This Case concerns the dispute relating to the grant of tax exemption under Section 80P of the Income Tax...

Back Wages of Labourers is a Question of Facts Depending Upon Various Factors: Gujarat High Court

The petition has been filed by workmen and employer against an award dated 23.04.2009 passed by the Labour Court,...

WhatsApp Messages Would Have No Evidentiary Value Until They Are Certified According to Section 65b of the Indian Evidence Act: Punjab & Haryana High...

Brief facts of the case Paramjit Kaur, the proprietor of Brioshine Pharma, a licensed chemist, booked two consignments. The first...

Follow us

With a whole lot of activities going online in the duration of the coronavirus or Covid-19 outbreak, why not the Indian Judiciary? The Supreme Court of India introduced a series of latest actions as a result of social distancing measures due to Coronavirus Pandemic.

Many countries like China, US, UK and many courts across the world have been forced to close or to formulate or frame alternative ways to work as emergency measure or response to the coronavirus outbreak.

Technology offers to be more actively involved in work even in this dreadful period. The Apex Court of India concluded that :

  • Lawyers will be allowed to argue their cases through video conferences, file cases online 24×7 and also watch proceedings on smart TVs in the press rooms of the court complex.
  • The Supreme court has discouraged all non-essential travel to the premise due to the coronavirus pandemic hitting hard in India.
  • Casual visitors will not be allowed to enter the apex court premise for tours or to visit the museum.

As a result, the Supreme Court heard 593 matters via video-conferencing and delivered judgement in 215 of them in a month during the Nationwide lockdown.

As Covid-19 infections spread in the country the Supreme Court shut its doors to the litigants and lawyers on March 23, two days before the lockdown came into force but opened up to a virtual way of functioning as The Supreme Court of India is the highest judicial court under the Constitution of India and it was nearly impossible to terminate the hearings of the occurring cases or matters or even new cases.

In normal times, the apex court disposes of nearly 3,500 cases on an average a month. Two-three benches have been taking up “urgent” matters in virtual courtrooms daily during the lockdown period. A total of 87 benches heard 593 cases on 17 working days between Match 23 and April 24, according to data provided by the court.

During the first phase of nationwide lockdown for containing the spread of coronavirus started on 25th March, the Supreme Court had issued a circular on 23rd March restricting entry of advocates and litigants. The circular further said that only matters involving extreme urgency would be heard by the top court via video conferencing.

  • 84 review petitions have been disposed by the apex court on April 24.
  • Out of 87 benches, 34 benches heard main matters and 53 benches focused on review petitions for adjudication.
  • 390 main matters and 203 connected cases, were heard during this period.
  • Verdicts were delivered in 215 cases out of which 174 were connected matters.

Hence, with technology comes complications as technical glitches were faced by the lawyers during video-conferencing due to internet connectivity issues at residence or offices of advocates.

The Supreme Court judges who are hearing matter through video-conferencing from their residences have been provided with internet connectivity with the speed of up to 100mbps at their residences so they face no difficulties.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Doctrine of Proportionality Must Adhere to Reasonableness Principal Test: Madras High Court

Young Men's Christian Association built a commercial complex and leased it without having due permission. The District Collector & Tahsildar issued a show-cause notice...

Delhi High Court Refuses To Stay Release of ‘The White Tiger’ on the OTT Platform Netflix

A plea requesting a stay on the release of the film ‘The White Tiger’ by the American producer, John Hart Jr. alleging copyright violation was rejected by the Delhi High Court on Thursday.

“Anganwadi Centers to Be Reopened Outside the Containment Zones, Which Is to Be Decided by the State”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the reopening of the Anganwadi Centers after they had been closed due to the lockdown being imposed.  Brief facts of the case This...

“Credit Facilities Being Granted by the Primary Agricultural Credit Society to the Non-Members Is No Longer Illegal”: Supreme Court

This Case concerns the dispute relating to the grant of tax exemption under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961.  Brief facts of the...

Back Wages of Labourers is a Question of Facts Depending Upon Various Factors: Gujarat High Court

The petition has been filed by workmen and employer against an award dated 23.04.2009 passed by the Labour Court, Bhuj in the case of...

WhatsApp Messages Would Have No Evidentiary Value Until They Are Certified According to Section 65b of the Indian Evidence Act: Punjab & Haryana High...

Brief facts of the case Paramjit Kaur, the proprietor of Brioshine Pharma, a licensed chemist, booked two consignments. The first consignment, on 10.06.2020 and the,...

Delhi High Court Seeks Response From Centre, RBI in PIL to Regulate Online Lending Platforms

A notice had been issued by the Delhi HC in a PIL that sought regulation of online lending platforms (Dharanidhar Karimojji vs UOI). Brief Facts: The...

“Consensual Affair” Cannot Be Defence Against the Charge of Kidnapping of the Minor, Sentence Reduced in View of Age Difference: Supreme Court

This Case concerns the appeal against the conviction under the charges of kidnapping and discussed whether the punishment was to be enhanced or not.   Brief...

Delhi HC to Municipal Corp: Paucity of Funds Not an Excuse for Non-Payment of Salaries and Pensions

The Delhi High Court ruled that the paucity of funds cannot be an excuse and pulled up municipal corporations for not paying salaries and pensions to their employees as the right to receive payment is a fundamental right guaranteed in our constitution.

US Supreme Court Reinstates Restriction on Abortion Pills

The Supreme Court of the United States granted the Trump administration’s request to reinstate federal rules requiring women to make in-person visits to hospitals...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -