Supreme Court fixes Fees for Filling and reproducing Documents under RTI

Must Read

Doctrine of Proportionality Must Adhere to Reasonableness Principal Test: Madras High Court

Young Men's Christian Association built a commercial complex and leased it without having due permission. The District Collector &...

Delhi High Court Refuses To Stay Release of ‘The White Tiger’ on the OTT Platform Netflix

A plea requesting a stay on the release of the film ‘The White Tiger’ by the American producer, John Hart Jr. alleging copyright violation was rejected by the Delhi High Court on Thursday.

“Anganwadi Centers to Be Reopened Outside the Containment Zones, Which Is to Be Decided by the State”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the reopening of the Anganwadi Centers after they had been closed due to the lockdown being...

“Credit Facilities Being Granted by the Primary Agricultural Credit Society to the Non-Members Is No Longer Illegal”: Supreme Court

This Case concerns the dispute relating to the grant of tax exemption under Section 80P of the Income Tax...

Back Wages of Labourers is a Question of Facts Depending Upon Various Factors: Gujarat High Court

The petition has been filed by workmen and employer against an award dated 23.04.2009 passed by the Labour Court,...

WhatsApp Messages Would Have No Evidentiary Value Until They Are Certified According to Section 65b of the Indian Evidence Act: Punjab & Haryana High...

Brief facts of the case Paramjit Kaur, the proprietor of Brioshine Pharma, a licensed chemist, booked two consignments. The first...

Follow us

Petitioner:

NGO Common Cause (2012)

Judge:

Justice AK Goel and Justice UU Lalit.

Questions of Law:

A Petition was filed in the year 2012 by an NGO Common Cause which attracted the judicial attention towards the imposition of excessive fee from general public seeking information under RTI.

The petition had challenged the Allahabad High Court (RTI) Rules, 2006, on the ground that they were obstructive and were not in consonance with the spirit of the Right to Information Act, 2005 (RTI Act). The petition contended that Rules 3, 4, 5, 20, 25, 26 and 27 of the Allahabad High Court (RTI) Rules, are in clear violation of the different provisions of the RTI Act and also violates Article 19(1) (a) of the Constitution.

Arguments:

During the initial hearing, Advocate Prashant Bhushan had referred to the specific provisions of the Act to demonstrate that the provisions of the aforesaid Rules are in violation of the provisions of the Act. It was his argument that Rule 4, which prescribes charging an exorbitant fee of Rs. 500 per application, has an effect of abridging the right to information and thus subverts the very object of the Act.

“There can be no doubt that such a high fee is unwarranted and cannot be considered to be reasonable.”

He contended that the application fee of Rs.500 as prescribed in the Rules is more than fifty times the fee prescribed by the Central Government. It was further contended by him that Rule 3 which prescribes that “every application shall be made for one particular item of information” is also ultra vires the RTI Act as there is no such restriction in the Act.

He also referred to an order passed by the Central Information Commission which had held that such stringent restrictive conditions, including such high level of fees, would surely deter citizens from freely seeking information from the HC which was not in conformity with the spirit of RTI Act.

The Allahabad High Court submitted that it was going to consider amending the Rules so as to bring it in consonance with the provisions of the Act. Subsequently, the High Court brought in some amendments and prescribed Rs.250 as application fees.

Order:

The Court has directed that RTI fees would be limited to Rs.50 per application and also fixed the upper limit of Rs.5 for photocopying documents required to obtain the information.

Applicability:

The order shall be applicable to all institutions, including high courts, legislative assemblies and other government and autonomous bodies that come within the ambit of the Right to Information (RTI) Act

Learning outcome:

On 15June 2005, THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT, 2005 was enacted to provide for setting out the practical regime of right to information for citizens to secure access to information under the control of public authorities, in order to promote transparency and accountability in the working of every public authority, the constitution of a Central Information Commission and State Information Commissions and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. Be it 2G Scam, Commonwealth Games- Diversion of Dalit Funds or Indian Red Cross Society Scam; have come into the picture through RTI Applications filed by various activists. Since the time this Act was enforced, it has brought a feeling of fear in minds of corrupt man and is building a rock-solid connection between government and society which is the foremost objective of a democratic country. It is expedient to provide for furnishing certain information to citizens who desire to have it.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Doctrine of Proportionality Must Adhere to Reasonableness Principal Test: Madras High Court

Young Men's Christian Association built a commercial complex and leased it without having due permission. The District Collector & Tahsildar issued a show-cause notice...

Delhi High Court Refuses To Stay Release of ‘The White Tiger’ on the OTT Platform Netflix

A plea requesting a stay on the release of the film ‘The White Tiger’ by the American producer, John Hart Jr. alleging copyright violation was rejected by the Delhi High Court on Thursday.

“Anganwadi Centers to Be Reopened Outside the Containment Zones, Which Is to Be Decided by the State”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the reopening of the Anganwadi Centers after they had been closed due to the lockdown being imposed.  Brief facts of the case This...

“Credit Facilities Being Granted by the Primary Agricultural Credit Society to the Non-Members Is No Longer Illegal”: Supreme Court

This Case concerns the dispute relating to the grant of tax exemption under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961.  Brief facts of the...

Back Wages of Labourers is a Question of Facts Depending Upon Various Factors: Gujarat High Court

The petition has been filed by workmen and employer against an award dated 23.04.2009 passed by the Labour Court, Bhuj in the case of...

WhatsApp Messages Would Have No Evidentiary Value Until They Are Certified According to Section 65b of the Indian Evidence Act: Punjab & Haryana High...

Brief facts of the case Paramjit Kaur, the proprietor of Brioshine Pharma, a licensed chemist, booked two consignments. The first consignment, on 10.06.2020 and the,...

Delhi High Court Seeks Response From Centre, RBI in PIL to Regulate Online Lending Platforms

A notice had been issued by the Delhi HC in a PIL that sought regulation of online lending platforms (Dharanidhar Karimojji vs UOI). Brief Facts: The...

“Consensual Affair” Cannot Be Defence Against the Charge of Kidnapping of the Minor, Sentence Reduced in View of Age Difference: Supreme Court

This Case concerns the appeal against the conviction under the charges of kidnapping and discussed whether the punishment was to be enhanced or not.   Brief...

Delhi HC to Municipal Corp: Paucity of Funds Not an Excuse for Non-Payment of Salaries and Pensions

The Delhi High Court ruled that the paucity of funds cannot be an excuse and pulled up municipal corporations for not paying salaries and pensions to their employees as the right to receive payment is a fundamental right guaranteed in our constitution.

US Supreme Court Reinstates Restriction on Abortion Pills

The Supreme Court of the United States granted the Trump administration’s request to reinstate federal rules requiring women to make in-person visits to hospitals...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -