Supreme Court: Entry Points to Puri to be Closed, Curfew to be Imposed During Rath Yatra

Must Read

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an...

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work,...

Follow us

Earlier, the Supreme Court had given the green signal to the annual Rath Yatra held in Puri, Odisha. On 22 June 2020, the Court imposed some restrictions on carrying out the event. The Court opined the imposition of a curfew in Puri starting at 8 PM on 22 June itself.

Brief Facts of the Case 

On June 18, the SC had stayed this year’s Rath Yatra in light of the rising number of COVID-19 cases in the state. The bench comprised of CJI SA Bobde and Justices AS Bopanna and Dinesh Maheshwari pronounced this order.

The bench suggested that annual Rath Yatra can be allowed subject to limited participation. But the bench observed that it is “impossible” to ensure there would be no assembly of devotees at the event.

Court’s Observation

After the Court’s June 18 order, the Centre, as well as, the State of Odisha, approached the Supreme Court. Both stood in support of carrying out the Rath Yatra. However, they suggested some restrictions to prevent the spread of COVID-19.

After hearing the parties, the bench allowed conduction of the Rath Yatra. The Court asked the state and the Centre to coordinate with the Jagannath Temple administration. The Supreme Court stated that there is no reason to cancel the Rath Yatra along its usual route from temple to temple if it is possible to ensure no public attendance.

The Supreme Court, however, altered the authorities that the situation can become dangerous if there is a lack of rules of caution. For this, the Court relied on yatra conducted in the 18-19th century. At that time, the Yatra resulted in the spread of cholera and plague “like wildfire”.

Court’s Order

The Court subjected the order to the following conditions for allowing the Rath Yatra from June 23:

– The Court ordered a curfew and a lockdown in Puri. For this, the Odisha government shall impose a curfew in the City of Puri during all the procession of Rath Yatra.

– Only those who test COVID-19 negative can perform the ritual and pull chariots that too with an interval. Moreover, there should be compliance with the social distancing protocols with as little participation as possible.

– The primary responsibility for conducting the Rath Yatra in accordance with the conditions be that of the committee in charge of the Puri Jagannath Temple administration. Also, the State Government may take such help as may be found necessary from the Union Government.

– The telecast of Rath Yatra shall be freely covered by the visual media. And lastly, the most important one to maintain a record of participants in light of the ongoing pandemic.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News,InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding that mens rea is an...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @ Balli v State. The bench...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up testing facilities in Delhi.   Facts of...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has set aside the 24.07.2019 Order...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an order restraining the manufacturing, marketing,...

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work, except the drinking water component...

There Can Be No Leniency Shown To Appellant Who Pleaded To Reduce Sentence: Delhi High Court

Facts On 25.2.2016 the victim’s sister who was 13 years old was present with her sister who was 2 years old (victim) at their home....

Violation of Executive Instructions Cannot Be Sole Ground to Invalidate Transfer Orders: Tripura High Court

In Dr Bithika Choudhury vs the State of Tripura & Ors., a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S.G. Chattopadhyay...

Case Regarding Anticipatory Bail, Applicant May Be Released Imposing Suitable Conditions: Gujarat High Court

A Single-Judge Bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Dr Justice A.P. Thakur had been hearing submissions of the Applicant to release him...

Proof of Infliction of Fatal Injury Not Mandatory for Conviction Under Section 307, IPC: Tripura High Court

In the case of Mamin Miah vs the State of Tripura, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S....

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -