Supreme Court dismissed petition seeking probe into Judge Loya’s death dubbing it ‘scandalous’

Must Read

US Court Orders Iran To Pay $1.4 BN in Damages To Missing Former FBI Agent’s Family

The United States District Court for the District of Columbia ordered Iran to pay in total $1.45 bn to...

Onus on Petitioner To Show Unassailable Facts: Delhi High Court

In the case of Rhythm Jain v National Testing Agency, the Delhi High Court mentioned that in such petitions the...

Under-Trial/Convicted Persons Do Not Have Absolute Right To Parole in Light of Coronavirus : Bombay High Court

An important judgment was given by the Division Bench of the Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court concerning the...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Asks State To File Reply To Examine Whether Privacy Rights of an Individual Can Be Violated by Issuing an Executive...

A Writ Petition was instituted by an individual for violation of his fundamental rights by the State before the...

Bombay High Court Allows Export of Pending Consignment of Onions in Respect of Which Shipping Bills Have Been Generated Before Notification of the Ban

A writ petition challenging the notification dated 14th September 2020 to ban the export of onions was filed by...

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding...

Follow us

Supreme Court on Thursday, April 19th dismissed several petitions seeking an independent probe into CBI Judge BH Loya‘s death ruling that he died of natural causes.

Facts of the case

Justice Loya had suffered a heart attack at Nagpur on December 1, 2014, while attending a wedding of a colleague’s daughter. Four eminent judges of the Bombay High Court, Shrikant Kulkarni, S M Modak, V C Barde and Roopesh Rathi, confirmed that there was no foul play and the death was due to natural cause. Since at the time Justice Loya was presiding over the high profile Sohrabuddin Sheikh fake encounter case there were allegations of foul play as to the circumstances of the death.

It was alleged in November 2017 by Justice Loya’s sister that the Judge was under serious political pressure because of the sensitive nature of the case which implied that the Judge may have died under unnatural circumstances. At the same time on January 12, four senior-most judges of the Supreme Court in a press conference hinted at rampant irregularities being practised at the Apex Court. They alleged that junior judges were given sensitive and high profile cases subverting the norm of the Supreme Court. All of these lead to several petitions being submitted to the Court seeking clarification on the situation as well as requesting an independent probe by the SIT on Justice Loya‘s death.

Court ruling

The case was heard by a three judges Division Bench comprising of the Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra and justices AM Khanwilkar and DY Chandrachud. The several petitions filed by Congress leader Tehseen Poonawala and Maharashtra based journalist BS Lone alleged that the circumstances of Justice Loya’s death were suspicious. It was further pointed out that the persons with whom the late Justice had shared his precarious situation also died under mysterious circumstances.

The Apex Court claimed that the pleas were “a vituperative assault on the judiciary” and “a scandalous attempt” to malign the name of the Court. The Court criticised the senior activist lawyers Dushyant Dave, Indira Jaising and Prashant Bhushan appearing on behalf of the petitioners for partaking in such an attempt to impugn the reputation of the Supreme Court.

Maharashtra government represented by senior advocates Mukul Rohatgi and Harish Salve along with Additional Solicitor General Tushar Mehta presented affidavits signed by four judges of the Bombay High Court who were with Justice Loya that day and also submitted the intelligence report of the investigation into Justice Loya’s death. The statement published by Justice Loya’s son on January 14 where he said that his father had died of natural causes was also reported to the Apex Court.

Senior advocate Rohatgi rubbished the conspiracy theories mentioned in the various PILs and claimed it was “an attempt to target ‘one individual’ in the guise of upholding the rule of law.” He stated that the whole incident was created to malign a certain political party and was targeted at BJP president Amit Shah who was implicated in the Sohrabuddin Sheikh case along with several other individuals such as Rajasthan Home Minister Gulabchand Kataria, Rajasthan-based businessman Vimal Patni, former Gujarat police chief PC Pande, Additional Director General of Police Geeta Johri and Gujarat police officers Abhay Chudasama and NK Amin, all of whom were later exonerated by the Apex Court.

The Supreme Court held, “documents placed on record and their scrutiny establish that Judge Loya’s death was due to ‘natural cause‘. The account of the incident provided by the four judges of the Bombay High Court appeared “credible, consistent and truthful” and “there is no reason for this court to doubt the veracity of their statements.” Justice Chandrachud wrote in his verdict, “Business rivalries have to be resolved in the market and political rivalries in the grand hall of democracy. It is the court’s duty to protect the law.”

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

US Court Orders Iran To Pay $1.4 BN in Damages To Missing Former FBI Agent’s Family

The United States District Court for the District of Columbia ordered Iran to pay in total $1.45 bn to the Levinson family in punitive...

Onus on Petitioner To Show Unassailable Facts: Delhi High Court

In the case of Rhythm Jain v National Testing Agency, the Delhi High Court mentioned that in such petitions the onus to prove the facts...

Under-Trial/Convicted Persons Do Not Have Absolute Right To Parole in Light of Coronavirus : Bombay High Court

An important judgment was given by the Division Bench of the Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court concerning the constitutionality of Rule 19 of...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Asks State To File Reply To Examine Whether Privacy Rights of an Individual Can Be Violated by Issuing an Executive...

A Writ Petition was instituted by an individual for violation of his fundamental rights by the State before the Madhya Pradesh High Court. The...

Bombay High Court Allows Export of Pending Consignment of Onions in Respect of Which Shipping Bills Have Been Generated Before Notification of the Ban

A writ petition challenging the notification dated 14th September 2020 to ban the export of onions was filed by the Exporters Association before the...

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding that mens rea is an...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @ Balli v State. The bench...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up testing facilities in Delhi.   Facts of...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has set aside the 24.07.2019 Order...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an order restraining the manufacturing, marketing,...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -