Supreme Court Cancels All Iron Ore Mining Lease in Goa

Must Read

Federal Court Denied Involvement of US Department of Justice in Trump’s Defamation Lawsuit

Background  The Plaintiff, E .Jean Carroll, published a book where she wrote that a businessman, Donald J Trump had raped...

SC Stays Order Restraining Physical Campaigns in the Madhya Pradesh Bye-Elections

On the 26th of October, a Bench was set up which comprised Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, and...

Lawsuit Filed Against Uber for Discriminatory “Star Rating System”

The lawsuit was bought in the District Court of North California against Uber. The plaintiff claims class-action status on...

Bombay High Court To Hear Plea Seeking Removal of Chairperson of National Commission for Women

A Writ Petition had been filed in the Bombay High Court challenging the conduct of the Chairperson of the...

Bombay High Court Passes Order To Clarify and Modify Previous Order When State of Maharashtra Moved Praecipe

Division Bench of Bombay High Court consisting of Justice S. V. Gangapurwala and Justice Shrikant D. Kulkarni had passed...

The European Court of Human Rights Orders Germany To Pay Non-Pecuniary Damages for Prison Strip-Searches 

A serving German prisoner was repeatedly stripped searched for non-legitimate purposes. The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) found...

Follow us

Facts

The Supreme Court on 8th of Feb, canceled 88 iron ore mining leases in Goa, dealing a blow to miners including Vedanta Ltd. The court said that the existing leases will run till 15 March, after which mining activity has to stop.

The court also directed the setting up of a special investigation team that will include a chartered accountant to determine the charges to be levied on the mining companies whose leases were renewed in 2015. Shares of Vedanta Ltd fell 1.96% to Rs315.35 on BSE, on a day the exchange’s benchmark Sensex dropped 0.33% to 34,082.71 points.

The case proceedings

The Supreme Court heard a public interest litigation by the Goa Foundation. The petition had questioned the renewal of mining leases in the state. The Goa Foundation, through its lawyer Prashant Bhushan, had argued that the state’s policy on renewing leases did not conform to the Supreme Court’s stand on optimum utilization of natural resources.

Advocate Bhushan contended that the state government has to auction the mining leases instead of renewing them. He said that the mines ordinance approved on 12 January 2015 did not spell out a renewal procedure. All renewals were done before the ordinance came into force, he said, with 31 leases being renewed on 12 January 2015.

The Mines and Minerals Amendment Bill was subsequently placed before Parliament and approved on 27 March 2015.

The Goa Foundation’s petition, a copy of which Mint has reviewed, alleged that miners and government authorities had colluded to circumvent not just the ordinance, but also the Supreme Court’s ruling of 21 April 2014. The renewal was against the court’s precedents laid down for the appropriate and optimum utilization of natural resources, the petition claimed.According to the petition, 56 leases were renewed between 6 and 12 January 2015, shortly before the ordinance was passed.

The petition has named 20 miners whose leases have been renewed. Some of these companies had earlier moved the Bombay high court seeking to direct the Goa government to consider and grant the second renewal of mining leases. It was on their petition that the Panaji bench of the Bombay high court had on 13 August 2014 directed the state government of Goa to execute the second renewal of leases in favor of companies that had paid the required stamp duty.

In 2016, the Goa Foundation had appealed this decision before the Supreme Court; that case is also being heard in the current batch of cases. The appeal said that the order “disembodies the directions” of the court.

Bench

The Supreme Court bench, headed by justice Madan B. Lokur, held the government’s process of renewing the mining leases of companies to be “in violation of law” and directed the state government to grant fresh licenses through an auction.

Judgement

The Supreme Court on Feb 8 quashed 88 mining leases granted by the Goa government for violating procedure and ordered that fresh licenses be granted through a bidding process.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Federal Court Denied Involvement of US Department of Justice in Trump’s Defamation Lawsuit

Background  The Plaintiff, E .Jean Carroll, published a book where she wrote that a businessman, Donald J Trump had raped her in a dressing room,...

SC Stays Order Restraining Physical Campaigns in the Madhya Pradesh Bye-Elections

On the 26th of October, a Bench was set up which comprised Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, and Justice Sanjiv Khanna. They heard...

Lawsuit Filed Against Uber for Discriminatory “Star Rating System”

The lawsuit was bought in the District Court of North California against Uber. The plaintiff claims class-action status on behalf of all the minority...

Bombay High Court To Hear Plea Seeking Removal of Chairperson of National Commission for Women

A Writ Petition had been filed in the Bombay High Court challenging the conduct of the Chairperson of the National Commission for Women. The...

Bombay High Court Passes Order To Clarify and Modify Previous Order When State of Maharashtra Moved Praecipe

Division Bench of Bombay High Court consisting of Justice S. V. Gangapurwala and Justice Shrikant D. Kulkarni had passed an Order on 25th October...

The European Court of Human Rights Orders Germany To Pay Non-Pecuniary Damages for Prison Strip-Searches 

A serving German prisoner was repeatedly stripped searched for non-legitimate purposes. The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) found that Germany had violated the...

Lack of Independent Witness Doesn’t Vitiate Conviction: Supreme Court

A three-judge Bench of the Supreme Court in Rajesh Dhiman v State of Himachal Pradesh clarified the law in case of lack of independent...

Madras High Court Observes Unexplained Delay in Procedural Safeguards, Quashes Detention Through Writ Petition

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus. The petitioner P. Lakshmi, called for records of the...

UK Court of Appeal Rules Home Department’s Deportation Policy of Immigrants Unlawful

Britain’s Court of Appeal quashed the Home Department’s deportation policy, declaring it unlawful; criticizing it for being too stringent on immigrants to comply with. Background The...

Supreme Court Stays Order Restraining Physical Campaigns in the Madhya Pradesh Bye-Elections

On the 26th of October, a Bench was set up which comprised Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, and Justice Sanjiv Khanna. They heard...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -