Calcutta Club Limited not liable to pay Sales Tax – Supreme Court

Must Read

[WhatsApp Privacy Policy Row] It’s a Private App, Don’t Use It; Says Delhi High Court

On Monday, while hearing a petition regarding the privacy policy of WhatsApp, the Delhi High Court said, “It is a private app. Don't join it. It is a voluntary thing, don't accept it. Use some other app.”

Madras High Court Asks the State To Reconsider Number of Seats Allotted for Bcm Category

Mr. Shakkiya filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution to issue a Writ of Mandamus....

Gujarat High Court Directs To Register Name of Petitioners in the Society Records as Owners of Property, as per Will

A single-judge bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Justice Biren Vaishnav, because probate wasn’t necessary and that...

If No Complaint Is Filed, No Further Orders Are Required To Be Passed: Telangana High Court

Excerpt In Matlakunta Sundaramma vs The State Of Telangana, on January 8, 2021, the Telangana High Court decided that there...

Gujarat High Court Allows Report Filed by Official Liquidator for Dissolution of the Company

The present report had been filed by the Official Liquidator for the dissolution of M/s AtRo Limited under the...

Parents of Road Accident Victim Entitled To Compensation: Delhi High Court

Justice JR Midha said, “Even if parents are not dependent on their children at the time of an accident, they will certainly be dependent, both financially and emotionally, upon them at the later stage of their life, as the children were dependent upon their parents in their initial years.”

Follow us

In one of the prominent case State of West Bengal vs. Calcutta Club Limited, the Apex court on 3rd October 2019 has stated that incorporated clubs are exempted from sales tax. This case verdict will work as a milestone especially in case of levying taxes on the incorporated association.

Timeline and Facts

The case came into light when Assistant commissioner of the commercial taxes issued a notice on 30.6.2002 against the club regarding non-payment of the sales tax by the club. In response to the notice, the club moves to the Appellate Tribunal in which the tribunal stated that the club does not fall in the peripheral of the sales tax. In this regard, the tribunal also stated that in this case the club is merely acting as an agent for its members and there is no transfer of property between the members and club.

Further, it also stated that there was no sales transaction or any type of transfer of property among the club and its members and for its reference it took the reference of Article 366(29-A) as well as Supreme Court and High court decision in the case of Hindustan Club Limited vs. CCT as well as distinguished the authority in the case of Automobile Assn. Eastern India vs. State of West Bengal in which it clearly stated that the term deemed sales will not be applicable to the cases as serving food supplies to its permanent members will not be amounted as sales. Hence there is no attraction of sales tax to the club for serving its permanent members.

Writ Petition against Calcutta Club Limited

After the dissatisfactory decision of the tribunal, Revenue Board filed a writ petition in the Calcutta High Court. The learned advocate on behalf of the revenue board argued that in this case that the insertion of Article 366 (29A-e) has struck down the essence of the doctrine of mutuality/trust or agency so far and hence in this case the doctrine of mutuality cannot be considered in this case. In response to the argument, the learned advocated from the respondent said that the section 2(5) of the West Bengal Sales Tax states that the association that has been formed must have a profit motive which is absent in this cases and that profit means the surplus that has been gained by the club through sales. He also objected that the companies under Section 25 of the Companies Act cannot be fitted under the definition of the body of a person and hence, Article 366 (29A-e) will not be applicable. After which Calcutta High Court was of the opinion that Doctrine of Mutuality cannot be removed completely, it still holds the important part and, hence, in this case, there are no sales been made by the club to its members. It further explained that the club is working as an agent to the members and is just a superstructural only, and no sale is occurring and upheld the tribunal decision.

The decision of the Court

The Higher appeal was made to the Supreme Court in which bench constituting Justice R.F. Nariman, Justice Surya Kant and Justice V. Ramasubramanian upheld the Calcutta High Court decision. Under this, the apex court upholds the position of Young Man’s Indian Association case in which the court stated that any type of preparation from one club member to its other members will not amount to sales and hence in this case also the sales tax will not attract club working.

[googlepdf url=”https://libertatem.in/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Calcutta-Club-Limited-Mutuality.pdf” download=”Download PDF” width=”100%” height=”900″]

Contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now. You can also join our Team of Courtroom and regularly contribute cases like the above one. 

For more Courtroom Updates, check out our Courtroom Page

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

[WhatsApp Privacy Policy Row] It’s a Private App, Don’t Use It; Says Delhi High Court

On Monday, while hearing a petition regarding the privacy policy of WhatsApp, the Delhi High Court said, “It is a private app. Don't join it. It is a voluntary thing, don't accept it. Use some other app.”

Madras High Court Asks the State To Reconsider Number of Seats Allotted for Bcm Category

Mr. Shakkiya filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution to issue a Writ of Mandamus. The petition sought to direct...

Gujarat High Court Directs To Register Name of Petitioners in the Society Records as Owners of Property, as per Will

A single-judge bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Justice Biren Vaishnav, because probate wasn’t necessary and that the petitioners were entitled to...

If No Complaint Is Filed, No Further Orders Are Required To Be Passed: Telangana High Court

Excerpt In Matlakunta Sundaramma vs The State Of Telangana, on January 8, 2021, the Telangana High Court decided that there is no requirement of passing...

Gujarat High Court Allows Report Filed by Official Liquidator for Dissolution of the Company

The present report had been filed by the Official Liquidator for the dissolution of M/s AtRo Limited under the provisions of Section 497 (6)...

Parents of Road Accident Victim Entitled To Compensation: Delhi High Court

Justice JR Midha said, “Even if parents are not dependent on their children at the time of an accident, they will certainly be dependent, both financially and emotionally, upon them at the later stage of their life, as the children were dependent upon their parents in their initial years.”

Plea Challenging the AIBE Rules Framed by BCI Filed in the Supreme Court

A Writ Petition was presently filed in the Supreme Court by a newly enrolled lawyer challenging the All India Bar Examination Rules 2010 which have been framed by the Bar Council of India which mandates that an advocate has to qualify for the All India Bar Examination (AIBE) to practice law after enrollment.

Bombay High Court: Mere Presence at the Crime Scene Not Enough for Punishment

The Bombay High Court ruled that it cannot be considered a crime if a person is merely present at the crime scene which falls under the Maharashtra Prohibition of Obscene Dance in Hotels and Restaurants and Bar Rooms and Protection of Dignity of Women Act 2016. It also quashed two First Information Reports (FIR) against two individuals who were arrested in a raid at a dance bar by the Santacruz Police, in 2017.

CAIT Files a Plea Against WhatsApp’s New Privacy Policy in the Supreme Court

Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT) has filed a petition against WhatsApp’s new privacy rules in the Supreme Court. The petition says that WhatsApp which is known to render public services by providing a platform to communicate has recently imposed a privacy policy that is unconstitutional, which not only goes against the fundamental rights of citizens but also jeopardizes the national security of our country.

RTI Activist Files a Plea in Bombay High Court Against Bharat Biotech’s Covaxin

On Saturday, a plea has been filed before the Bombay High Court by an activist stating that Bharat Biotech Covaxin had not been granted full approval but a restricted use in clinical trials according to the Drugs Comptroller General of India. The Company's phase 3 trials are ongoing and the DGCI has not made any data available in the public domain for peer- review by independent scientists.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -