SC: Disabled Persons may choose not to stand when National Anthem is being played

Must Read

US Court Orders Iran To Pay $1.4 BN in Damages To Missing Former FBI Agent’s Family

The United States District Court for the District of Columbia ordered Iran to pay in total $1.45 bn to...

Onus on Petitioner To Show Unassailable Facts: Delhi High Court

In the case of Rhythm Jain v National Testing Agency, the Delhi High Court mentioned that in such petitions the...

Under-Trial/Convicted Persons Do Not Have Absolute Right To Parole in Light of Coronavirus : Bombay High Court

An important judgment was given by the Division Bench of the Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court concerning the...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Asks State To File Reply To Examine Whether Privacy Rights of an Individual Can Be Violated by Issuing an Executive...

A Writ Petition was instituted by an individual for violation of his fundamental rights by the State before the...

Bombay High Court Allows Export of Pending Consignment of Onions in Respect of Which Shipping Bills Have Been Generated Before Notification of the Ban

A writ petition challenging the notification dated 14th September 2020 to ban the export of onions was filed by...

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding...

Follow us

The Supreme Court had made it mandatory for the National Anthem to be played in the cinema halls before each film show starts. The Court, by the order of 30 November 2016, had issued guidelines in the interlocutory order as to how this rule ought to be followed. Every citizen should mandatorily stand for the National Anthem. The theater doors must remain closed during that time to prevent any person from walking in or exiting during that time. No short form of the National Anthem must be played. Thus, many such guidelines were issued by the Supreme Court to prevent any sort of misconduct towards the Anthem in two interim orders which were issued on 30 November 2016 and 9 December 2016.

Facts :

Nevertheless, on behalf of the National Platform for the Rights of the Disabled, an application was filed before this court to exempt the disabled from the purview of the order on 30 November 2016 and 9 December 2016. It is quite inhuman to expect the disabled persons to abide by the guidelines issued especially when it requires to stand up during the time of the Anthem.

Issue :

Should the interim order of the Supreme Court regarding the National Anthem be binding on the persons with disabilities?

Judgment :

The Supreme Court realizing the necessity to attend to their specific situation ordered an exemption to the disabled persons in the interim order issued on 18 April, 2017

The Supreme Court realized the necessity to attend to their specific situation ordered an exemption to the disabled persons in the interim order issued on 18 April 2017.

The Supreme Court charted out the following infirmities to be treated as a disability for the requirement:-

  1. Wheel Chair Users – can be cerebral palsy, Parkinson’s, Multiple sclerosis, Muscular dystrophy or other conditions
  2. Autism
  3. Cerebral Palsy
  4. Intellectual Disabilities
  5. Mental Illness
  6. Deaf-Blind
  7. Multiple Disabilities
  8. Parkinsons, Multiple Sclerosis
  9. Leprosy Cured
  10. Muscular Dystrophy

Any person who is affected by the aforementioned disabilities need not be restrained by the hard-and-fast reading of the rules issued on 30 November 2016. They are exempted from the orders of the court in relation to the National Anthem in cinema halls which were issued on 30 November 2016 and 9 December 2016.

Learning Outcome:

The disabled persons are not liable to stand up while the National Anthem is being played in the theaters.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

US Court Orders Iran To Pay $1.4 BN in Damages To Missing Former FBI Agent’s Family

The United States District Court for the District of Columbia ordered Iran to pay in total $1.45 bn to the Levinson family in punitive...

Onus on Petitioner To Show Unassailable Facts: Delhi High Court

In the case of Rhythm Jain v National Testing Agency, the Delhi High Court mentioned that in such petitions the onus to prove the facts...

Under-Trial/Convicted Persons Do Not Have Absolute Right To Parole in Light of Coronavirus : Bombay High Court

An important judgment was given by the Division Bench of the Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court concerning the constitutionality of Rule 19 of...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Asks State To File Reply To Examine Whether Privacy Rights of an Individual Can Be Violated by Issuing an Executive...

A Writ Petition was instituted by an individual for violation of his fundamental rights by the State before the Madhya Pradesh High Court. The...

Bombay High Court Allows Export of Pending Consignment of Onions in Respect of Which Shipping Bills Have Been Generated Before Notification of the Ban

A writ petition challenging the notification dated 14th September 2020 to ban the export of onions was filed by the Exporters Association before the...

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding that mens rea is an...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @ Balli v State. The bench...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up testing facilities in Delhi.   Facts of...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has set aside the 24.07.2019 Order...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an order restraining the manufacturing, marketing,...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -