Salient Features Of New Consumer Protection Bill 2018

Must Read

Andhra Pradesh High Court: CRP Disposed; Parties Need to be Present Either Physically or Virtually

  The Single-Judge Bench of Andhra Pradesh High Court comprising of Hon'ble Smt. Justice Kongara Vijaya Lakshmi decided the case...

Bombay HC Pursues a Case Regarding Payment of Interest on Delayed Payment of Taxes: Says the Interest to Be Levied on the Net Cash...

  KLT Automotive and Tubular Products Limited filed a writ petition with the primary contention that interest is levied only...

Punjab & Haryana High Court: Registration of Fir Does Not Construe Any Final Opinion About the Case

Hitesh Bhardwaj (Petitioner) has preferred the present petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC). The...

Allahabad High Court Directs University to Take Concerned Measures

The High Court of Judicature, Allahabad had decided the case Satya Prakash Tiwari & Others v. State Of U.P....

U.S. District Court Sentences NXIVM Founder Keith Raniere to 120 Years in Prison Over Sex Trafficking and Racketeering Charges

The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York convicts NXIVM (pronounced “nexium”) founder, Keith Raniere, to...

Tripura High Court Provides Interim Relief to Prevent the Frustration of Object in a Writ Petition Alleging Error in NEET Scores

  In W.P(C) 720 of 2020, Hon’ble Justice S.G Chattopadhayay dealt with an interim relief prayed under a writ for...

Follow us

The Consumer Protection Bill 2018, which was recently passed by the Lok Sabha, is slated to replace the existing act of Consumer Protection Act 1986. The Consumer protection Bill of 2018 has certain new features which were missing in the prevailing Consumer Protection Act 1986. The highlights of the new bill include the following features.

Addressing Growth of E-Commerce

One of the most notable features of the new bill is to attempt to address the concerns of the consumers arising from the growth of modern E-Comerce and false and misleading advertisements. This concern of the bill is apparent from the definitional clause of the new bill itself. According to the definition of ‘Consumer’ include all those who buy goods or avail the same service online through E-Commerce outlets, the further explanation has been provided under section 2(7) which defines consumer lays down

(b) The expression “buys any good” and “hires or avails any service” include online and offline transactions through electronic mode or by teleshopping or by direct selling or multinational marketing”.

Combating with the Misleading Statements

The second most notable feature of the new bill is to target against false and misleading statements which can be penalised with fines. On being reference made to the Central Consumer Protection Authority under Section 21 a fine up to Rs 10 lakh can be imposed on those who broadcast such false and misleading statement as well as one year ban. Repeated offences may attract the penalty of 50 lakh and a ban on exhibition/appearance up to three years can be made.

Creation of the Central Consumer Protection Authority

The bill proposes to create new authority called as the Central Consumer Protection Authority under Section 10 of the Act. As per the provision of Section 10, the Central authority is empowered to regulate on matters relating to the violations of the consumers rights, false and misleading statements and unfair trade practices. The task of the Central Consumer Protection Authority is to promote, protect and enforce the rights of the consumers. The functions of the Central Consumer Protection Authority includes

  • Hearing complaints referred to the Central Consumer Protection Authority
  • Make suitable recommendations to fortify consumer protection
  • Research and awareness regarding the consumer protection

Mediation

Chapter V of the new Bill provides with the procedure to be followed to refer the consumer dispute for mediation. Section 74 of the new bill provides for the creation for Mediation Cells to be attached to the District Consumer protection, State Consumer Commissions and National Consumer Commission. Section 37 under Chapter V provides for the reference of dispute for the process of mediation, if there is the possibility of settlement by the parties. Further in the Chapter V provides with the details of the procedure to be followed in mediating consumer disputes. If the parties to the dispute are unable to reach to the settlement through the process of mediation, the matter will be reverted back to the concerned forum to hear it.

Changes in the Pecuniary Jurisdiction

The new Consumer Protection bill of 2018 has revised the pecuniary jurisdiction for the three tiered Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission which are as follow:

  • District Commission: Complaints valued up to  Rs 1 crore
  • State Commission: Complaint valued between  Rs 1 crore- Rs 10 crore
  • National Commission: Complaints valued up to Rs 10 crore or above

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Andhra Pradesh High Court: CRP Disposed; Parties Need to be Present Either Physically or Virtually

  The Single-Judge Bench of Andhra Pradesh High Court comprising of Hon'ble Smt. Justice Kongara Vijaya Lakshmi decided the case of Andhavarapu Swetha @ Tankala...

Bombay HC Pursues a Case Regarding Payment of Interest on Delayed Payment of Taxes: Says the Interest to Be Levied on the Net Cash...

  KLT Automotive and Tubular Products Limited filed a writ petition with the primary contention that interest is levied only on the net tax liability...

Punjab & Haryana High Court: Registration of Fir Does Not Construe Any Final Opinion About the Case

Hitesh Bhardwaj (Petitioner) has preferred the present petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC). The petition seeks appropriate directions to...

Allahabad High Court Directs University to Take Concerned Measures

The High Court of Judicature, Allahabad had decided the case Satya Prakash Tiwari & Others v. State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Higher Edu. Lko...

U.S. District Court Sentences NXIVM Founder Keith Raniere to 120 Years in Prison Over Sex Trafficking and Racketeering Charges

The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York convicts NXIVM (pronounced “nexium”) founder, Keith Raniere, to 120 years in prison over...

Tripura High Court Provides Interim Relief to Prevent the Frustration of Object in a Writ Petition Alleging Error in NEET Scores

  In W.P(C) 720 of 2020, Hon’ble Justice S.G Chattopadhayay dealt with an interim relief prayed under a writ for correction of marks obtained in...

NGT Pulls up PMC, Asks to Shift Waste Processing Plant at Baner

  Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 27th October 2020, directed Pune Municipal Corporation (PMC) to close the plant and shift it to...

Plea Seeking Dream 11 to Be Declared as Betting Platform Dismissed by Rajasthan High Court

Rajasthan HC dismissed a plea that alleged Dream 11 to be a betting platform, on the assertion that the game depends on skill &...

Federal Court Denied Involvement of US Department of Justice in Trump’s Defamation Lawsuit

Background  The Plaintiff, E .Jean Carroll, published a book where she wrote that a businessman, Donald J Trump had raped her in a dressing room,...

SC Stays Order Restraining Physical Campaigns in the Madhya Pradesh Bye-Elections

On the 26th of October, a Bench was set up which comprised Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, and Justice Sanjiv Khanna. They heard...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -