Reasonable and Acceptable explanation are necessary for Condonation of Delay: Supreme Court

Must Read

WhatsApp Emails Delhi HC Judge Asking Her Not To Hear the Plea Challenging New Privacy Policy

The Delhi High Court raised strong objection to an E-mail sent by WhatsApp asking a judge not to hear the plea which challenges its new privacy policy. Justice Pratibha Singh said that the e-mail that was withdrawn later was totally unwarranted as she was anyway going to recuse from hearing the plea which was filed by Rohilla Chaitanya who contends that the new privacy policy of WhatsApp provides 360-degree access to a customer’s virtual activity and is against the fundamental right of privacy.

TRP Scam Case: Bombay HC Extends Protection To Arnab Goswami and Other Employees Till the Next Hearing

On Friday, the Bombay High court extended the protection that was given, to Republic TV’s Editor in Chief Arnab Goswami and other employees of ARG Outlier Media Private Limited till January 29th in the alleged case of Television Rating Point manipulation. A status report was submitted by the police to the division bench of Justices S.S.Shinde and Manish Pitale by the Police on the ongoing case.

Plea Seeks FIR Against Maharashtra Minister Dhananjay Munde in Bombay HC for False Info

A plea has been filed in Bombay High Court seeking an FIR against Maharashtra minister Dhananjay Munde who is undergoing times of trouble due to his extra-marital affair. Recently, an FIR had been lodged against Munde by a woman, accusing him of raping her sister. Munde clarified that he was actually in a relationship with that woman and had two children. He accused the two women of blackmailing him.

Writ Petition for Compensation Accepted by Calcutta High Court 

Introduction The Petitioner Purna Ch. Biswas filed a Writ Petition with the complaint that their claims for a higher quantum...

No Members Could Be Disqualified Without Authorisation by Political Party: Gujarat High Court

Excerpt The dispute application no.7 of 2020 filed by respondent no.2 before designated authority. Thereafter the designated authority order dated...

Delhi High Court Directs Delhi Jal Board To Make Supply of Potable Drinking Water

The High Court of Delhi in the matter of Delhi Sainik Cooperation Housing Ltd. v. Union of India &...

Follow us

In an important case between Delhi University vs. Union of India & Ors. Court clearly stated that only reasonable and acceptable explanation can be entertained in the appeal of condonation of delay and not the unreasonable or routine explanation

Facts of the case

The case came into limelight after the appeal for condonation of delay of 916 days as well as the letter of patent appeal was declined by the Delhi High Court. The case was regarding allotment of land which was held in the zone ‘C’ of the Delhi University and was given to a private Builder to make multi-story building on it without any height restriction by DDA, on which the Delhi University had objections which were raised in its writ petition.

  1. The land was held with the Delhi metro project for building metro station but DDA has allotted the land  to the private builders which violate the law and it is against the public policy
  2. Another contention that was placed by the university was that it creates a hindrance to the archaeological and historical characteristics of the University as well as Women safety as there are many women hostel present on the campus.
  3. The high raised commercial building under the Delhi master plan 2021 was prohibited near Delhi University control area but then also land was allotted.

In this case, the Delhi University delayed in filing the writ against the order of DDA (Delhi Development Board) passed on 12/5/2011 which was rejected by the learned single Judge of High Court against which letter of the patent was filed in the Delhi High Court and which latterly got rejected.  After which appeal was filed to the Supreme Court in which the appellant justified its delay in filing the writ in the High Court as well as why his letter of patent appeal should have been accepted by the court. 

Reasons for delay of Writ

The reasons that were put forward by appellant for the delay of the writ filing were that vice- Chancellor Post was empty from 28/10/15 to 10/03/2016 due to which the writ was not able to be filed at right time another reason that was filed was delay in various reports no other strong reasons were presented in front of the court. Therefore, these reasons were not accepted by the Court and nor the Letter of Patent appeal as the judge has delivered the right decision the writ was delayed and had laches which cannot be accepted.

Decision of the Supreme Court

The bench comprising of Justice R. Banumathi, Justice AS Bopanna and Justice Hrishikesh Roy was of the opinion that there is need to take a liberal approach towards the matter of condonation of delay but the rights of the opposite party must also be kept in mind as it has an adverse effect on them. Therefore the condonation of delay is not automatic. Court also explained that everyday delay should not be explained but explanation must be reasonable and acceptable than only it will be held valid. Therefore the Supreme Court upheld the decision of the High Court and the reasons given by the appellant for the delay is not valid.

[googlepdf url=”https://libertatem.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Delhi-Univ-Delay-Condonation_watermark.pdf” download=”Download Judgement PDF” width=”100%” height=”900″]


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

WhatsApp Emails Delhi HC Judge Asking Her Not To Hear the Plea Challenging New Privacy Policy

The Delhi High Court raised strong objection to an E-mail sent by WhatsApp asking a judge not to hear the plea which challenges its new privacy policy. Justice Pratibha Singh said that the e-mail that was withdrawn later was totally unwarranted as she was anyway going to recuse from hearing the plea which was filed by Rohilla Chaitanya who contends that the new privacy policy of WhatsApp provides 360-degree access to a customer’s virtual activity and is against the fundamental right of privacy.

TRP Scam Case: Bombay HC Extends Protection To Arnab Goswami and Other Employees Till the Next Hearing

On Friday, the Bombay High court extended the protection that was given, to Republic TV’s Editor in Chief Arnab Goswami and other employees of ARG Outlier Media Private Limited till January 29th in the alleged case of Television Rating Point manipulation. A status report was submitted by the police to the division bench of Justices S.S.Shinde and Manish Pitale by the Police on the ongoing case.

Plea Seeks FIR Against Maharashtra Minister Dhananjay Munde in Bombay HC for False Info

A plea has been filed in Bombay High Court seeking an FIR against Maharashtra minister Dhananjay Munde who is undergoing times of trouble due to his extra-marital affair. Recently, an FIR had been lodged against Munde by a woman, accusing him of raping her sister. Munde clarified that he was actually in a relationship with that woman and had two children. He accused the two women of blackmailing him.

Writ Petition for Compensation Accepted by Calcutta High Court 

Introduction The Petitioner Purna Ch. Biswas filed a Writ Petition with the complaint that their claims for a higher quantum of compensation have not yet...

No Members Could Be Disqualified Without Authorisation by Political Party: Gujarat High Court

Excerpt The dispute application no.7 of 2020 filed by respondent no.2 before designated authority. Thereafter the designated authority order dated 28.10.2020 disqualified the petitioner and...

Delhi High Court Directs Delhi Jal Board To Make Supply of Potable Drinking Water

The High Court of Delhi in the matter of Delhi Sainik Cooperation Housing Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors held that right to...

Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders Security To BJP Leader Alleged for Not Supporting Farmers Protest

The Order had come in the form of a Writ Petition filed by Tikshan Sood under Article 226 of the Constitution. The petition before...

Lahore High Court Outlaws Two-Finger Virginity Test

The Lahore High Court in Pakistan has outlawed the use and conduct of virginity tests, namely, the use of the “two-finger” virginity test and...

London Court Rejects Assange’s Extradition – What Happens Now? 

Earlier last week, District Judge Vanessa Baraitser, sitting in the Westminster Magistrates’ Court denied the Government of the U.S.A.'s request to the U.K. to...

Calcutta High Court Decides in Favor of Contractor as He Accidentally Pays an Excessively High Amount

Introduction The present writ petition has been filed for a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondents to revoke the Petitioner’s offer as...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -