New Roster For Supreme Court To Come Into Force From 2nd July

Must Read

New Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) Amendments Are Valid Says Supreme Court

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court upheld the amendments in the insolvency and bankruptcy code which makes it mandatory for a minimum of 100 or 10% of home buyers of a project to initiate insolvency proceedings against a builder for not delivering flats or commercial shops on time.

[HUL – Sebamed Ad War] Bombay High Court Passed Injunction; Permits Sebamed Ad Against HUL’s Dove

The ad war between the German personal care brand Sebamed and the consumer goods giant Hindustan Unilever Ltd (HUL) has come to an end. On January 19th, Bombay High Court passed an injunction order permitting the Sebamed ad against Hindustan Unilever’s Dove without any changes. It was observed that Sebamed ads were backed with evidence-based data. However, Sebamed was ordered to put an end to its advertisement that compared HUL soap bars Lux, Pears, and Santoor with Rin and detergent category.

Bombay High Court Says White Collar Crimes Are More Dangerous Than Murder and Dacoity

The Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court rejected 4 petitions of 4 businessmen after observing that white-collar crimes are more serious than murder and dacoity. The businesspersons were booked for fraud of evading GST by producing fake invoices.

Right To Protection Can’t Be Granted To Married Woman Involved in Live-in Relationship: Allahabad High Court

The Bench of Allahabad High Court dismissed a petition of a live-in couple, observing that a married woman in a live-in relationship is not entitled to any sort of legal protection whatsoever. The Court remarked that they are adults and should live as ‘husband and wife’ if they want no one to interfere in their lives.

Police To Decide on the Entry of Farmers To Delhi on Republic Day Says Supreme Court

While the Supreme Court heard a plea seeking an injunction against the tractor rally that is scheduled for January 26th, it held that it is the decision of the Delhi Police officers to see whether the protesting farmers should get entry into Delhi on Republic Day.

[Sushant Singh Rajput Case]: Republic TV & Times Now Hindered Investigation Probe Says Bombay HC

In November last year, the Court had reserved its judgement on the PILs that came from 8 former police officers from Maharashtra, lawyers, activists and NGOs, seeking restraining orders against the media trial in the Sushant Singh Rajput case.

Follow us

Supreme Court of India just restructured the manner in which a case is assigned to a judge. Chief Justice of India after introducing a subject wise roster earlier this year in February has now modified it. The new roster will be followed in the Supreme Court from 2nd July 2018 when it reopens after summer vacations. The modified roster is still a subject wise roster only difference is the change in judge looking after a particular type of case. According to the new roster Public Interest Litigations, arbitration cases, election matters, habeas corpus matters appointment of constitutional functionaries, social justice matter will be heard by the Chief Justice of India. Mortgage and money matters have been handed over to Justice Kurian, which under the earlier roster were looked after by Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Justice A.K Sikri. Justice Ranjan Gogoi will now look after ordinary civil matters, labour matters, indirect taxes matter, contempt of court matter among others. Justice M.B. Lokur will now handle land acquisition and requisition matters, service matters, land laws, consumer matters, protection of wildlife, felling of trees matters. Justice A.K Sikri who is the newest member of the collegium will be dealing with direct tax cases, election matters, criminal matters. Justice S.A Bobde will be responsible for academic matters, compensation matters, admission matter, maritime matters and cases related to leases and government contracts. Justice A.K Goel will be managing direct tax matters, company law, MRTP, TRAI, SEBI, IDRAI and RBI matter, mercantile laws and banking cases. Similarly, the remaining judges have also been allotted cases subject-wise.

Supreme Court roster has been changed or modified due to the retirement of the second senior most judge of the Supreme Court i.e Justice J. Chelameswar. Justice Chelameswar served in Supreme Court for approximately seven years and retired on 22nd June.

Master of the roster controversy

Recently an issue was stirred by four senior-most judges of Supreme Court Justice Chelameswar, Justice Gogoi, Justice Lokur, Justice Joseph who held a press conference in which they revealed that administration of the Apex Court is not in order and that many things less than desirable have been happening in the last few months. They wrote a letter to Chief Justice of India wherein they underlined the fact that Chief Justice of India has not been strictly following well-settled conventions guiding his role as master of the roster. They further said in that letter that “There have been instances where cases having far-reaching consequences for the Nation and institution had been assigned by the Chief Justice of this Court selectively to the benches of their preference without any rational basis for such assignment.” Grievances mentioned in the letter were soon supported and acknowledged by the Campaign for Judicial Accountability and Reforms which went on to say that certain cases were being allotted to selected judges so that decision could be obtained in a manner favourable to the government. Moreover, it listed numerous instances where gross abuse of power of the master of roster took place. Some of them were the dismissal of a petition demanding an independent probe into the allegation of corruption in medical college bribery case, a petition challenging the appointment of Special Director of CBI, Petition seeking independent probe in death of Special CBI Judge B.H Loya.  Senior advocate and former Law Minister Shanti Bhushan filed a petition seeking clarification on the administrative authority of the CJI and praying for a declaration that listing of matter must strictly adhere to the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 and Handbook on Practice and Procedure and Office Procedure. All the court proceedings have been completed in this case and Judgment has been reserved.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

New Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) Amendments Are Valid Says Supreme Court

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court upheld the amendments in the insolvency and bankruptcy code which makes it mandatory for a minimum of 100 or 10% of home buyers of a project to initiate insolvency proceedings against a builder for not delivering flats or commercial shops on time.

[HUL – Sebamed Ad War] Bombay High Court Passed Injunction; Permits Sebamed Ad Against HUL’s Dove

The ad war between the German personal care brand Sebamed and the consumer goods giant Hindustan Unilever Ltd (HUL) has come to an end. On January 19th, Bombay High Court passed an injunction order permitting the Sebamed ad against Hindustan Unilever’s Dove without any changes. It was observed that Sebamed ads were backed with evidence-based data. However, Sebamed was ordered to put an end to its advertisement that compared HUL soap bars Lux, Pears, and Santoor with Rin and detergent category.

Bombay High Court Says White Collar Crimes Are More Dangerous Than Murder and Dacoity

The Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court rejected 4 petitions of 4 businessmen after observing that white-collar crimes are more serious than murder and dacoity. The businesspersons were booked for fraud of evading GST by producing fake invoices.

Right To Protection Can’t Be Granted To Married Woman Involved in Live-in Relationship: Allahabad High Court

The Bench of Allahabad High Court dismissed a petition of a live-in couple, observing that a married woman in a live-in relationship is not entitled to any sort of legal protection whatsoever. The Court remarked that they are adults and should live as ‘husband and wife’ if they want no one to interfere in their lives.

Police To Decide on the Entry of Farmers To Delhi on Republic Day Says Supreme Court

While the Supreme Court heard a plea seeking an injunction against the tractor rally that is scheduled for January 26th, it held that it is the decision of the Delhi Police officers to see whether the protesting farmers should get entry into Delhi on Republic Day.

[Sushant Singh Rajput Case]: Republic TV & Times Now Hindered Investigation Probe Says Bombay HC

In November last year, the Court had reserved its judgement on the PILs that came from 8 former police officers from Maharashtra, lawyers, activists and NGOs, seeking restraining orders against the media trial in the Sushant Singh Rajput case.

Women Advocates Move To Supreme Court Against the Delhi HC Orders on Resuming Physical Hearing

Another writ petition has been filed by women advocates in the Supreme Court against the decision of the Delhi HC of directing the expansion of physical hearing of cases within the National Capital Territory of Delhi without giving an option to litigants to be represented by their lawyers virtually.

Gujarat High Court Allows Report Filed by Official Liquidator for Dissolution of the Company

The present report had been filed by the Official Liquidator for the dissolution of M/s AtRo Limited under the provisions of Section 497 (6)...

[WhatsApp Privacy Policy Row] It’s a Private App, Don’t Use It; Says Delhi High Court

On Monday, while hearing a petition regarding the privacy policy of WhatsApp, the Delhi High Court said, “It is a private app. Don't join it. It is a voluntary thing, don't accept it. Use some other app.”

Madras High Court Asks the State To Reconsider Number of Seats Allotted for Bcm Category

Mr. Shakkiya filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution to issue a Writ of Mandamus. The petition sought to direct...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -