New Roster For Supreme Court To Come Into Force From 2nd July

Must Read

Himachal Pradesh High Court Supports Promotion Based on Seniority of Post Rather Based on the Eligibility Test

In the case of Ramesh Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, the petitioner, reached the court as...

NCDRC Dismisses PIL against Urologist, Holy Family Hospital, Says Mode Of Treatment Or Skill Differs From Doctor To Doctor

The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a petition against Holy Family Hospital and a Urologist, alleging negligence...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Disposes Suit for Possession and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction Due To Mutual Consent

In the case of Parveen Kumar vs Smt. Vijay Laxmi and Ors, the Petitioner, Parveen had filed a suit for declaration,...

Supreme Court Appoints Committee To Examine Arbitrariness of Sealing of Resorts in Elephant Corridor, Tamil Nadu

A Full Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, in the matter of Hospitality Association of Mudumalai V. In...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules That Export Ban on N95 Masks & PPE Kits Does Not Violate Fundamental Right of Traders

The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that the formulation and regulation of trade policies were within the subjects of...

Delhi High Court Issues Notice To Two Pleas Filed Praying for Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage

The Court heard two writ petitions which urged that the Special Marriage Act and the Foreign Marriage Act be...

Follow us

Supreme Court of India just restructured the manner in which a case is assigned to a judge. Chief Justice of India after introducing a subject wise roster earlier this year in February has now modified it. The new roster will be followed in the Supreme Court from 2nd July 2018 when it reopens after summer vacations. The modified roster is still a subject wise roster only difference is the change in judge looking after a particular type of case. According to the new roster Public Interest Litigations, arbitration cases, election matters, habeas corpus matters appointment of constitutional functionaries, social justice matter will be heard by the Chief Justice of India. Mortgage and money matters have been handed over to Justice Kurian, which under the earlier roster were looked after by Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Justice A.K Sikri. Justice Ranjan Gogoi will now look after ordinary civil matters, labour matters, indirect taxes matter, contempt of court matter among others. Justice M.B. Lokur will now handle land acquisition and requisition matters, service matters, land laws, consumer matters, protection of wildlife, felling of trees matters. Justice A.K Sikri who is the newest member of the collegium will be dealing with direct tax cases, election matters, criminal matters. Justice S.A Bobde will be responsible for academic matters, compensation matters, admission matter, maritime matters and cases related to leases and government contracts. Justice A.K Goel will be managing direct tax matters, company law, MRTP, TRAI, SEBI, IDRAI and RBI matter, mercantile laws and banking cases. Similarly, the remaining judges have also been allotted cases subject-wise.

Supreme Court roster has been changed or modified due to the retirement of the second senior most judge of the Supreme Court i.e Justice J. Chelameswar. Justice Chelameswar served in Supreme Court for approximately seven years and retired on 22nd June.

Master of the roster controversy

Recently an issue was stirred by four senior-most judges of Supreme Court Justice Chelameswar, Justice Gogoi, Justice Lokur, Justice Joseph who held a press conference in which they revealed that administration of the Apex Court is not in order and that many things less than desirable have been happening in the last few months. They wrote a letter to Chief Justice of India wherein they underlined the fact that Chief Justice of India has not been strictly following well-settled conventions guiding his role as master of the roster. They further said in that letter that “There have been instances where cases having far-reaching consequences for the Nation and institution had been assigned by the Chief Justice of this Court selectively to the benches of their preference without any rational basis for such assignment.” Grievances mentioned in the letter were soon supported and acknowledged by the Campaign for Judicial Accountability and Reforms which went on to say that certain cases were being allotted to selected judges so that decision could be obtained in a manner favourable to the government. Moreover, it listed numerous instances where gross abuse of power of the master of roster took place. Some of them were the dismissal of a petition demanding an independent probe into the allegation of corruption in medical college bribery case, a petition challenging the appointment of Special Director of CBI, Petition seeking independent probe in death of Special CBI Judge B.H Loya.  Senior advocate and former Law Minister Shanti Bhushan filed a petition seeking clarification on the administrative authority of the CJI and praying for a declaration that listing of matter must strictly adhere to the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 and Handbook on Practice and Procedure and Office Procedure. All the court proceedings have been completed in this case and Judgment has been reserved.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Himachal Pradesh High Court Supports Promotion Based on Seniority of Post Rather Based on the Eligibility Test

In the case of Ramesh Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, the petitioner, reached the court as he was aggrieved by the...

NCDRC Dismisses PIL against Urologist, Holy Family Hospital, Says Mode Of Treatment Or Skill Differs From Doctor To Doctor

The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a petition against Holy Family Hospital and a Urologist, alleging negligence in diagnosing the septicemia and...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Disposes Suit for Possession and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction Due To Mutual Consent

In the case of Parveen Kumar vs Smt. Vijay Laxmi and Ors, the Petitioner, Parveen had filed a suit for declaration, possession and a permanent prohibitory...

Supreme Court Appoints Committee To Examine Arbitrariness of Sealing of Resorts in Elephant Corridor, Tamil Nadu

A Full Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, in the matter of Hospitality Association of Mudumalai V. In Defence of Environment and Animals...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules That Export Ban on N95 Masks & PPE Kits Does Not Violate Fundamental Right of Traders

The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that the formulation and regulation of trade policies were within the subjects of the Central Government. Any reasonable...

Delhi High Court Issues Notice To Two Pleas Filed Praying for Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage

The Court heard two writ petitions which urged that the Special Marriage Act and the Foreign Marriage Act be interpreted to also apply to...

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Challenging Allahabad High Court Order Granting Interim Bail on Medical Grounds

An appeal was filed before the Supreme Court, challenging the Judgment & Order of the Allahabad High Court in the matter of State of U.P...

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Seeking Lawyers and Legal Clerks To Travel in Local Trains

The present hearing arose out of a batch of Public Interest Litigations that was filed in the Bombay High Court to permit the members...

Provisions for Retirement of Teachers Must Be Read With the Larger Interest of Students in Mind: Supreme Court

Supreme Court in Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal v State of Uttarakhand reinstated the appellants to their position as Professor on basis of re-employment till the...

Parties Cannot Deny Specific Performance Merely Due To Delay: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court, in Ferrodous Estate v P Gopirathnam, revisited the law on the specific performance of a contract. It reiterated that mere delay...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -